Case law

Willis v. Marchant

521 F. App'x 269 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 29, 2013

PER CURIAM: David Willis appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his *270 complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). … Willis v. Marchant, No. 3:12-cv-00843-RGD (W.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2013).

Standard Oil Co. v. United States

1 F.2d 961 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 29, 1924

Gill & Sons Forge & Machine Works v. United States (C. C. … Ed. 474 ; Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. United States (C. C. A. 2d Circuit) 1 F. (2d) 233; P. H. Gill & Sons Forge & Machine Works v. United States (C. C.

Virginia-Lincoln Furniture Corp. v. Com'r of Int. Rev.

56 F.2d 1028 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 7, 1932

United States v. Anderson, 269 U. S. 422 , 46 S. Ct. 131 , 70 L. Ed. 347 ; Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U. S. 445 , 50 S. Ct. 202 , 74 L. Ed. 538 ; Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U. S. 359 , 51 S. … See Underwood v. Commissioner (C. C. A. 4th) 56 F.(2d) 67 . The decision of the Board will be reversed, and the cause will be remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion. Reversed.

Michael Scott v. Cricket Communications, LLC

865 F.3d 189 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 28, 2017

Brown v. Keene, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 112, 115 (1834). Whether a person is a domiciliary turns on the individual’s intent. Not all those physically present within a state are residents. See Ecker v. Atl. … Robertson v. Cease, 97 U.S. 646, 648 (1878). As courts of limited jurisdiction, we are constitutionally prohibited from “inferr[ing] argumentatively” that a person’s residency is her domicile. Brown, 33 U.S.

Keeffe Brothers, John H. Johnson v. Teamsters Local Union No. 592, John H. Johnson v. Teamsters Local Union No. 592

562 F.2d 298 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 12, 1977

Simmons v. Avisco, supra; Eisman v. Baltimore Reg. Joint Bd. of Amal. Cloth. Wkrs. … The action of the Executive Board on May 13, 1973, was indisputably illegal 5 and, in challenging such illegal action, the plaintiff was under no obligation to exhaust administrative remedies. Simmons v.

Robert E. Lee v. Consolidation Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

843 F.2d 159 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 30, 1988

The Board, however, has indicated that modification is proper by the Board or by an AU where that claim is being considered by either body. See Curry v. Beatrice Pocahontas Co., 3 BLR 1-306 (1981), and Penoyer v. … We note that the cases of Director, OWCP v. Peabody Coal Co., 837 F.2d 295 (7th Cir.1988), and Director, OWCP v.

Willie Holly v. W. Frank Smyth, Jr., Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary

280 F.2d 536 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 3, 1960

Brown v. … The quoted sentence must be considered in connection with the reference to Brown v.

Legg's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

114 F.2d 760 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 21, 1940

In accordance with this concept of our duty, we reversed an order of the Board and remanded the case for further proceedings in Underwood v. … Holland Banking Co., 8 Cir., 75 F.2d 713, 715 ; Hamilton Gas Co. v. Watters, 4 Cir., 75 F.2d 176, 182 ; Manchester Board & Paper Co. v. Commissioner, 4 Cir., 74 F.2d 838, 840 ; Roosevelt v. Missouri State Life Ins.

Levy v. Commonwealth of Virginia State Board of Elections

49 F. App'x 448 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 30, 2002

PER CURIAM: Charles William Levy appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against the Virginia State Board of Elections. … See Levy v. State Bd. of Elections, No. CA-02-283- A (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 2, 2002 & entered Aug. 6, 2002).

McGill v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners

505 F. App'x 258 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 22, 2013

BALTIMORE CITY BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. … Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July 16, 2012. The notice of appeal was filed on August 22, 2012.

Trokon Diahn v. Todd Blanche

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 5, 2026

His brief provided the Board with sufficient opportunity to correct any error by the IJ. See Kurfees v. … See Annor, 95 F.4th at 827 (describing the relevant Board precedent). Neither the immigration judge nor the Board did so. That was legal error. See, e.g., Orellana v.

Island Creek Coal Company v. Manford Henline Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

456 F.3d 421 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 8, 2006

Instead, the Board rejected Island Creek’s statute of limitations defense on the ground that, per its decision in Adkins v. Donaldson Mine Co., BRB No. 89-2902 BLA, 1993 WL 13021683 (DOL Ben. Rev. Bd. … SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 95 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943). In Gulf & Western Industries v.

Michael E. Bowles Lynn G. Bowles v. United States

820 F.2d 647 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 3, 1987

See id.; Brown v. United States, 427 F.2d 57, 62 (9th Cir.1970). … In Brown v. United States, 427 F.2d 57 (9th Cir.1970), the Ninth Circuit confronted the same issue.

New West Materials LLC v. Interior Board of Land Appeals

216 F. App'x 385 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 8, 2007

Appellants appealed the BLM’s notice to the Interior Board of Land Appeals ("IBLA"), which affirmed the BLM’s trespass determination. … See Dredge Corp. v. Penny, Civ. No. 475 (D.

Kimberly Polk v. Montgomery County Public Schools

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 28, 2026

See Zak v. … See Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Couns. v.

United States v. Ernest Lattie Honeycutt

311 F.2d 660 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 27, 1962

ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge. … The measurement of the sufficiency of evidence in a criminal case was stated by this court in Bell v.

Watson v. Shenandoah University

699 F. App'x 262 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 26, 2017

See Watson v. Shenandoah Univ., No. 5:14-cv-00022-EKD-JCH, 2017 WL 1181029 (WD. Va. Mar. 29, 2017).

Smith v. Commissioner

67 F.2d 167 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 3, 1933

Collins & Co. v. Hyslop & Son, 11 Ala. 508 ; Jansen v. Hyde, 8 Colo. App. 38 , 44 P. 760 ; G. Taylor et al. v. A. G. Branham & Co., 35 Fla. 297 , 17 So. 552 , 39 L. R. A. 362, 48 Am. St. Rep. 249 . … Co. v. Surrells, 115 Ill. App. 615 ; Adams v. Walker, 59 Ga. 506 ; Wilson & Wheeler v. Nance & Collins, 11 Humph. (Tenn.) 189. , In Cowen v. Merriman, 17 App. D.

Herbert William Manke v. United States

259 F.2d 518 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 24, 1958

Pine v. United States, 4 Cir., 212 F.2d 93 ; DeMoss v. United States, 8 Cir., 218 F.2d 119 . See also United States v. Wilson, 7 Cir., 215 F.2d 443 . … See DeMoss v. United States, supra; Weaver v. United States, 8 Cir., 210 F.2d 815 ; Elder v. United States, 9 Cir., 202 F.2d 465 .

Epstein v. Helvering

120 F.2d 427 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 10, 1941

Co. v. … Federal Trade Comm. v. American Tobacco Co., 264 U.S. 298, 307 , 44 S.Ct. 336, 337, 338 , 68 L.Ed. 696 , 32 A.L.R. 786 ; Panama R. Co. v. Johnson, 264 U.S. 375, 390 , 44 S.Ct. 391, 395 , 68 L.Ed. 748 ; Blodgett v.