“Litigants are not entitled to discovery fishing expeditions to determine whether a claim exists.”
How later courts described this case
- “Litigants are not entitled to discovery fishing expeditions to determine whether a claim exists.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Willis appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his *270 complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Willis v. Marchant, No. 3:12-cv-00843-RGD (W.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.