Case law

Ingram Tedder v. Merchants & Manufacturers Insurance Company of New York

251 F.2d 250 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 6, 1958

Lipscomb v. Johnson, 123 S.C. 44 , 115 S.E. 753 ; Newton v. Bennett, 111 S.C. 1 , 96 S.E. 620 ; Loveless v. Gilliam, 70 S.C. 391 , 50 S.E. 9 . … The sharecropper relationship of itself did not constitute Brown Tedder’s agent. It was said in the case of Powers v.

Unsatisfied Claim And Judgment Fund Board v. The Bar Harbor Insurance Agency, Inc.

422 F.2d 396 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 19, 1970

422 F.2d 396 UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, Johannes Leppik and Valdek Leppik, Appellants, v. The BAR HARBOR INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., and Inland Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees. No. 13412.

Janie Maynor Locklear, North Carolina League of Women Voters, Amicus Curiae v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

514 F.2d 1152 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 23, 1975

Nevertheless, Kramer is apposite because, as said in Reynolds v. … Compare Abate v. Mundt, 403 U.S. 182 , 91 S.Ct. 1904 , 29 L.Ed.2d 399 (1971). 5 . The implied premise of Kramer was that a citizen in a given jurisdiction has an equal right to vote with other citizens. Dunn v.

National Labor Relations Board, Janet Love, Intervenor v. Office and Professional Employees International Union, Local 2, Afl-Cio

902 F.2d 1164 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 14, 1990

Certainly the majority is correct that we are bound to uphold the Board’s construction of the statute if it is a reasonable one. Pattern Makers, 473 U.S. at 114 , 105 S.Ct. at 3074 (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. … NLRB v.

Hopson v. Shelby Mut. Cas. Co.

203 F.2d 434 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 7, 1953

The plaintiff is, therefore, limited to showing implied permission from the circumstances surrounding the initial entrustment of the automobile by Frank to Brown. See Robinson v. … See, also, United States Casualty Company v. Bain, 191 Va. 717 , 62 S.E.2d 814 ; Sordelett v. Mercer, 185 Va. 823 , 40 S.E.2d 289 .

Brown v. Director of the VDOC

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 7, 1996

Keith Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). … The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v.

Harrison v. Ayers

673 F.2d 724 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 5, 1982

Board of Regents v. … Compare Johnson v. Fraley, 470 F.2d 179 (4th Cir. 1972). For example, Harrison was not fired abruptly, but was given a full year to find another position.

Brown v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Estill

269 F. App'x 266 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 10, 2008

v. … See Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

Windolyn A. Turner v. Michael Grant Howard Brown

952 F.2d 397 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 27, 1991

TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael GRANT; Howard Brown, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-7226. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 5, 1991. Decided Dec. 27, 1991. … Turner v. Grant, No. CA-91-493-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 1991).

Halstead Metal Products, a Division of Halstead Industries, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, Halstead Metal Products, a Division of Halstead Industries, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board

940 F.2d 66 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 3, 1991

P 10,829 HALSTEAD METAL PRODUCTS, A DIVISION OF HALSTEAD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … NLRB v. Ferguson, 257 F.2d 88, 90 (5th Cir.1958). Direct evidence of motive is rarely available, and the Board may rely on circumstantial evidence to determine motive. NLRB v.

United States v. Aaron Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 9, 2018

United States v. Bolton, 858 F.3d 905, 911 (4th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We must first ensure that the district court did not commit a significant procedural error. Gall v. … United States v. Hampton, 628 F.3d 654, 659 (4th Cir. 2010) (quoting USSG § 3A1.2(c)(1)).

James Rosemond v. Richard Hudgins

92 F.4th 518 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 13, 2024

See Zak v. … Schick v.

Brown v. Town of Chapel Hill

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 19, 1996

BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA; LOIS J. … Brown concedes that the submission of the EEOC determination letter to the jury was within the discretion of the trial judge. Chandler v. Roudebush, 425 U.S. 840, 863 n.39 (1976); Cox v.

National Labor Relations Board, and Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Local Union No. 391, Intervenor v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.

558 F.2d 205 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 29, 1977

We must accept the Board’s finding if it is supported by substantial evidence on the whole record, Universal Camera Corp. v. … See NLRB v. Metropolitan Petroleum Co., 506 F.2d 616 (1st Cir. 1974); NLRB v. Gray Line Tours, Inc., 461 F.2d 763, 764 (9th Cir. 1972); Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v.

United States v. William Newton Van Fossen

460 F.2d 38 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 16, 1972

In United States v. Browning, 390 F.2d 511 (4th Cir. 1968), and United States v. … In United States v.

Kimberly Tucker v. School Board of VA Beach

633 F. App'x 842 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 29, 2016

TUCKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, Defendant – Appellee, and DR. … See Tucker v. School Bd. VA Beach, No. 2:13-cv-00530-RBS-LRL (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2015).

Marvel Specialty Company, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Bell Hosiery Hills, Inc., and Cross-Appellant

330 F.2d 164 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 3, 1964

See, e. g., Power Curbers, Inc. v. E. D. Etnyre & Co., 298 F.2d 484 (4 Cir. 1962) ; S. H. Kress & Company v. … Co. v. Sales Affiliates, 164 F.2d 260 (4 Cir. 1947). In addition, the disclosures of the Brown patent resulted in a great benefit to the hosiery industry.

De'Andre Dunston v. Nurse Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 3, 2018

NURSE BROWN, Medical/Nurse; RIVERSIDE REGIONAL JAIL, Kitchen, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. … See CVLR Performance Horses, Inc. v.

Love-Lane v. Martin

355 F.3d 766 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 22, 2004

See also Cromer v. Brown, 88 F.3d 1315, 1326 (4th Cir.1996). In sum, the content and context of Love-Lane’s speech establish that she was speaking about a matter of public concern. … Peters v.

Henry v. Greenville Airport Commission

279 F.2d 751 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 20, 1960

Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ; Holmes v. City of Atlanta, 350 U.S. 879 , 76 S.Ct. 141 , 100 L.Ed. 776 ; Dawson v. … Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 6 Dawson v.