Case law

Jennings v. Brown

902 F.2d 28 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 18, 1990

JENNINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. BROWN; M. Rostafinski; M. Altizer; E.D. Carey, Dr.; D. Dunn; R. Mangialetti; B. Soles; J. Kelling; S. Newman; W. Harding; T. Burwin; R. Saunders; R. Brown; C. Manrique; M. Wood; S. … Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945). 3 As the order appealed from is not a final order, it is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 .

United States v. Jonathan Pinson

860 F.3d 152 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 19, 2017

The prior owner of the business, Collin Brown, had struggled to make a profit. In 2008, Brown met with Robinson, who eventually introduced him to Pinson and businessmen Robert Williams and Lance Wright. … Both Brown and Mims testified that Mims oversaw the construction for and reported to Supremes, LLC.

Raynovich v. Brown

914 F.2d 248 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 10, 1990

Theodore RAYNOVICH, Petitioner, v. Torrey C. BROWN, Secretary of the Department of Natural Resources, Donald E. MacLaucklan, Director of the Forest Park and Wildlife Service, Michael R. … Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945). Denial of a motion for recusal is not a final order. City of Cleveland v.

Baltimore & O. R. v. Commissioner

78 F.2d 456 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 3, 1935

This action of the respondent was sustained by the Board. … United States v. Anderson, 269 U. S. 422 , 46 S. Ct. 131 , 70 L. Ed. 347 ; American National Co. v. United States, 274 U. S. 99 , 47 S. Ct. 520 , 71 L. Ed. 946 ; Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193 , 54 S. Ct. 356 , 78 L.

Smith Barney, Incorporated, Formerly Known as E. F. Hutton & Company, Inc., a Securities Broker Dealer Incorporated in De Lehman Brothers, Incorporated, a Securities Broker Dealer Incorporated in De v. Critical Health Systems of North Carolina, Incorporated of Raleigh, North Carolina, Formerly Known as Wake Anesthesiology Associates, Incorporated Wake Anesthesiology, Incorporated Money Purchase Pension Plan, of Raleigh, North Carolina Wake Anesthesiology Profit Sharing Plan, of Raleigh, North Carolina Peter Modrow, of Raleigh, North Carolina

212 F.3d 858 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 15, 2000

Miller, Bedzow, Korn, Brown, Miller & Zemel, P.A., Aventura, Florida; Peter J. Sarda, Wallace, Creech & Sarda, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. … See Mastrobuono v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Stanton Enterprises, Inc., Doing Business as Holiday Inn of Charleston

351 F.2d 261 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 30, 1965

It is the function of the Board, not its examiner, to determine what policies will effectuate the Act’s purposes. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 *264 U.S. 474, 494, 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … Whether language used by an employer is coercive is to be determined by the experienced judgment of the Board in light of the surrounding circumstances. Daniel Construction Company v.

Lewis v. Alamance County

99 F.3d 600 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 4, 1996

Were the Fourteenth Amendment no more than a concession to the racial realities of the day, Brown v. Board of Commissioners would have remained an untaken step. … ."); Brown v.

Brown v. Turner

892 F.2d 74 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 1, 1989

BROWN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Walter TURNER, individually, and as a Florence County Deputy Sheriff; Florence County Sheriff's Department, Florence County; William C. … II. 17 In United States v.

United States v. Francis

475 F. App'x 940 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 21, 2012

United States v. Francis, No. 7:94-cr-40106-JLK-4 (W.D.Va. May 18, 2012).

Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital

572 F.3d 176 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 13, 2009

WHATLEY, M.D.; CYNTHIA BROWN, M.D., Defendants-Appellees. … Hall v. Vir- 8 PHILIPS v.

Doe v. Lukhard

493 F.2d 54 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 26, 1974

Woolfolk v. Brown, 456 F.2d 652 (4 Cir. 1972) was cited as support for the conclusion that rights and benefits created by the Social Security Act were within the ambit of protection afforded by 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . … However, despite the district court’s contrary conclusion, we do not think that either question was decided sub silentio by us in Woolfolk v. Brown, supra.

Siddhanth Sharma v. Alan Hirsch

121 F.4th 1033 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 14, 2024

See Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 737 n.8 (1974); Fed. Election Comm’n v. Wis. Right to Life, Inc., 551 U.S. 449, 462 (2007); Davis v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 554 U.S. 724, 735 (2008). … Any potential “chilling effect” will be “self-inflicted,” and thereby untraceable to the Board’s requirements. See Clapper v.

Kozlowski v. Hampton School Board

77 F. App'x 133 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 3, 2003

KOZLOWSKI v. HAMPTON SCHOOL BOARD 5 final jury instructions. … KOZLOWSKI v. HAMPTON SCHOOL BOARD 31 remaining errors.

Brown v. Dept of Health & Men

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 29, 1996

BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, Defendant - Appellee. … Brown v. Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, No. CA-90-1564-JFM (D. Md. May 12, 1995).

Whitener v. McWatters

112 F.3d 740 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 30, 1997

In Tenney v. … See Butz v, Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 511-12 , 98 S.Ct. 2894, 2913-14 , 57 L.Ed.2d 895 (1978) (finding administrative law judge within executive department entitled to absolute immunity); Brown v.

United States v. Russell Laffitte

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 14, 2024

When confronted with this issue, the Second, Third, Sixth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have followed Brown. See United States v. Thomas, 116 F.3d 606, 620–25 (2d Cir. 1997); United States v. … Brown, 823 F.2d at 596.

United States v. Hemby-Brown

233 F. App'x 328 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 16, 2007

PER CURIAM: Shonate Hemby-Brown appeals from her fifty-month sentence imposed after we remanded for resentencing in accordance with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and United States v. … United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 734 (1993); United States v. White, 405 F.3d 208, 215 (4th Cir. 2005).

Brown v. Minnix

896 F.2d 1366 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 13, 1990

Luther Robert BROWN; Rose M. Brown, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. W. Raymond MINNIX, Judge, Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court; Mary L. … Under Feldman, the matter is not properly before this Court. 4 The district court's entry of summary judgment against the Browns was appropriate. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 -322-26 (1985).

United States v. William Kelly Brown

110 F.3d 61 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 4, 1997

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Kelly BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-7863. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted March 27, 1997. Decided April 4, 1997. … United States v. Brown, Nos. CR-93-17, CA-96-48-2-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 1996).

David Edwards, William C. Rich, Michael S. Kelly, Iskcon, Inc., Baltimore Chapter, and Irvin Collins, Raymond Kissane and Bruce Melzack v. Maryland State Fair and Agricultural Society, Inc. Howard Mosner, Jr., Manager, Maryland State Fair, and Cornelius Behan, Chief, Baltimore County Police Department, David Edwards, William C. Rich, Michael S. Kelly, Iskcon, Inc., Baltimore Chapter, and Irvin Collins, Raymond Kissane, and Bruce Melzack v. Maryland State Fair and Agricultural Society, Inc., and Howard Mosner, Jr., Manager, Maryland State Fair, and Cornelius Behan, Chief, Baltimore County Police Department

628 F.2d 282 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 12, 1980

Maryland appropriates funds to the State Fair Board to be disbursed by it for premium awards, promotional and education activities and "for one state fair each year, as designated by the board." … Silberman, 464 F.Supp. 866 (M.D.Fla.1979); ISKCON v. Griffin, 437 F.Supp. 666 (W.D.Pa.1977); ISKCON v. Conlisk, 374 F.Supp. 1010 (W.D.Ill.1973); and ISKCON v.