Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca4

10,000+ results

1.11s

  • J.D. Ex Rel. Davis v. Kanawha County Board of Education

    571 F.3d 381 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 9, 2009

    J.D. v. … See Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v. W. Va.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Townes v. Jarvis

    577 F.3d 543 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 19, 2009

    Br. of Appellees at 9, belies any suggestion that the Board lacks power to provide Townes relief. Given the wide discretion the Board enjoys, see Vann v. … We need not enter this fray because Johnson has no bearing on how the Virginia Parole Board chooses to exercise its "absolute” discretion over parole. See Garrett v.

    Cited 62 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. Lynchburg City School Board ex rel. Barker

    583 F. App'x 270 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 29, 2014

    Hayes appeals the district court’s order granting Lynchburg City School Board’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … Hayes v. Lynchburg City Sch. Bd., No. 6:13-cv-00008-NKMRSB, 2014 WL 901213 (W.D.Va. Mar. 7, 2014). We deny as moot the School Board’s motion to quash.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Moon (Rodney) v. Howard County Board of Education

    729 F.2d 1453 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 24, 1984

    729 F.2d 1453 Moon (Rodney) v. Howard County Board of Education NO. 83-2045 United States Court of Appeals, fourth Circuit. FEB 24, 1984 1 Appeal From: D.Md. 2 AFFIRMED; REVERSED AND REMANDED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bryant (Bennie D.) v. U.S., Railroad Retirement Board

    727 F.2d 1102 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 13, 1984

    727 F.2d 1102 Bryant (Bennie D.) v. U.S., Railroad Retirement Board NO. 82-1235 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth circuit. FEB 13, 1984 1 Appeal From: R.R. Retirement Bd. 2 AFFIRMED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pecola Annette Wright v. Council of the City of Emporia and the Members Thereof, and School Board Ofthe City of Emporia and the Members Thereof

    442 F.2d 570 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 23, 1971

    At the same time, the history of school integration is replete with numerous examples of actions by state officials to impede the mandate of Brown v. … Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955) (Brown II).

    Reversed by Wright v. Council of Emporia, 407 U.S. 451 (1972)Cited 23 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. American Wholesalers, Inc.

    546 F.2d 574 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 17, 1976

    Board Member Walther dissented for the reasons stated by Member Kennedy. 4 Upon review, we accept the Board’s conclusion that the second hearing officer did not commit prejudicial error. … Accordingly, we enforce the Board’s order. ALBERT V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Huntley v. North Carolina State Board of Education

    538 F.2d 324 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 3, 1976

    538 F.2d 324 Huntley v. North Carolina State Board of Education No. 75-2096 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 8/3/76 1 M.D.N.C. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Huntley v. North Carolina State Board of Education

    539 F.2d 705 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 14, 1976

    539 F.2d 705 Huntley v. North Carolina State Board of Education No. 75-2096 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 6/14/76 1 M.D.W.C. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clay v. Chairman, Virginia Probation and Parole Board

    526 F.2d 588 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 1, 1975

    526 F.2d 588 Clay v. Chairman, Virginia Probation and Parole Board 75-1033 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit 7/1/75 1 E.D.Va. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Reliable Coal Corporation

    420 F.2d 379 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 3, 1970

    420 F.2d 379 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. RELIABLE COAL CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 13367. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued January 6, 1970. Decided February 3, 1970. … On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Arnold A. Hammer, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Edinburg Manufacturing Company

    394 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 11, 1968

    PER CURIAM: Substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the Board’s findings that the employer violated § 8(a) (1) of the Labor Act by interrogating employees and creating an impression of surveillance and § 8( … We therefore enforce in its entirety the Board’s order which enjoin *2 ed further conduct of this character and required the employer to compensate the employee for earnings lost from the time of the layoff until her reinstatement

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Summers Printing Co.

    101 F.2d 1016 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 19, 1939

    Order of National Labor Relations Board enforced. Consent decree filed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clinton Cotton Mills v. National Labor Relations Board

    91 F.2d 1008 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 3, 1937

    Order of National Labor Relations Board modified and enforced, and petition for review dismissed. Consent decree filed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gibbs & Cox, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    904 F.2d 214 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 1, 1990

    DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge: This long-standing labor dispute is today resolved by our finding that the Marine Technicians Guild (the Union), represented in this action by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), is a

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Excavation-Construction, Inc. v. The National Labor Relations Board

    660 F.2d 1015 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 8, 1981

    Finding no unlawful wage increase, we do not enforce the Board’s order with respect to that matter. 4 *1024 V Nature of the August Strike The Board concluded that the strike by Local 639 on August 14, 1978 was an unfair labor … NLRB v. United Brass Works, inc., 287 F.2d 689 (4th Cir. 1961); NLRB v. Yama Work-craft, Inc., 580 F.2d 942 (9th Cir. 1978); Gulf States Mfrs. Inc. v. NLRB, 579 F.2d 1298 (5th Cir. 1978).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Robert S. Green, Inc.

    125 F.2d 485 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 31, 1942

    National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 101 F.2d 841 , which was sustained as to .the jurisdictional holding in National Labor Relations Board v. … Mooresville Cotton Mills v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 94 F.2d 61 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Kotarides Baking Co., Inc.

    340 F.2d 587 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 7, 1965

    The employer sought to have the Board review the action of the Regional Director, and the Board sustained the action on the ground of the pendency of the complaint case. … lose the right to be heard before the Board and before a reviewing court.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Industrial Turnaround Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    115 F.3d 248 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 30, 1997

    “The Board has broad discretion to choose a remedy,” NLRB v. … Although our review of NLRB decisions is normally deferential, we review the Board's ruling on a constitutional issue de novo. See Multi-Channel TV Cable Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    126 F.3d 246 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 11, 1997

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioners, v. … Goldtex, Inc. v. NLRB, 14 F.3d 1008, 1011 (4th Cir. 1994).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.