The opinion
PER CURIAM:
Substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the Board’s findings that the employer violated § 8(a) (1) of the Labor Act by interrogating employees and creating an impression of surveillance and § 8(a) (3) by discriminatorily laying off a union adherent. We therefore enforce in its entirety the Board’s order which enjoin
*2
ed further conduct of this character and required the employer to compensate the employee for earnings lost from the time of the layoff until her reinstatement.
Enforcement granted.