Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,730 results
1.56s
Robert S. v. Stetson School, Inc.
256 F.3d 159 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jul 3, 2001
In light of Rendell-Baker, it is appar ent that many of the factors upon which Robert relies here ar e insufficient to establish state action. … S 6351(a)(2)(iii), but also to "[a]ny individual resident within or without [the] Commonwealth" who is found to be qualified or to a qualified "private organization." 42 PA. CONS. STAT. ANN.
Cited 24 timesUnknownUnited States v. Kenneth Moreland
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Sep 6, 2024
Taylor, 596 U.S. 845, 852 (2022) (holding that attempted Hobbs Act robbery does not qualify as a “crime 2 of violence” under § 924(c)). … If Moreland establishes all three elements, we may exercise our discretion to award relief only if the error “seriously affect[ed] the fairness, integrity[,] or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedVineland Fireworks Co. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives
544 F.3d 509 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Oct 10, 2008
and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity … Thus, it clearly does not limit the Director's review to an "arbitrary and capricious" standard. See id. [11] To the extent that Vineland argues that our decision in Kowalchick v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedUnited States v. Nicodemo Scarfo
41 F.4th 136 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jul 15, 2022
Pelullo has not established any error based on the government’s use of filter teams. IV. … All 12 of you have to agree on at least two predicate or qualifying acts as to any individual defendant.
Cited 40 timesPublishedConstruction Drilling, Inc. v. Chusid
131 F. App'x 366 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · May 11, 2005
In the instant case, the New Jersey Court’s denial of the motion to stay terminated all litigation on the docket for the New Jersey action thus qualifying the denial of this unorthodox 60(b) motion as an appealable final … Because Chusid has not established a clearly erroneous finding of fact, an errant conclusion of law or an improper application of law to fact, there is no reason to find that the New Jersey Court abused its discretion by
Cited 6 timesUnpublished201 F.3d 200 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jan 14, 2000
The district court granted Defendant partial summary judgment, ruling that the short-term plan was not a qualified plan under ERISA and dismissing all claims arising out of that plan. See DiFederico v. Rolm Co., No. … Plaintiff complains that the district court's findings number 18, 23, 27, 28, 30, 31, 38, 42, and 44 are clearly erroneous.
Cited 14 timesUnknown741 F.2d 707 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Aug 31, 1984
The district court's findings of fact must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Its conclusions of law, however, are subject to broad review and will be reversed if incorrect. … Smith's tender offer clearly qualifies as a triggering event, as Gearhart doubtless meant it to do.
Cited 30 timesPublished263 F. App'x 219 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jan 30, 2008
The safety valve provisions were enacted to provide relief to individuals playing 1 “The safety valve provisions establish that a defendant shall be sentenced pursuant to the sentencing guidelines without … court that the defendant has complied with this requirement. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). 3 minor roles in drug trafficking conspiracies, who lacked the detailed knowledge to qualify
Cited 1 timesUnpublished409 F.3d 155 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · May 16, 2005
The appointment of counsel is clearly mandatory for an indigent petitioner. See United States v. … R.Civ.P. 8(c) does not bar sua sponte consideration of the AEDPA’s statute of limitations provision, we follow a long line of precedent establishing the authority of courts to raise non-jurisdictional defenses sua sponte
Cited 126 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Sep 5, 2002
Clearly, if proof of the essential elements of the cause of action require individual treatment, then there cannot be a predominance of "questions of law and fact common to the members of the class." … inaction in the face of such awareness qualifies as "due diligence;" (3) that Garrett Paper’s asserted small size excuses its inaction; (4) that none of the other named Appellees knew or had reason to know about the alleged
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Mar 1, 2002
Moreover, even if we thought that it did, this conversation would still fail to establish S 1983 liability on the part of the Administration because LaFrance, as a guidance counselor, does not qualify as the type of policy-making … The "for the purpose of " language of the indecent assault statute clearly establishes that the conduct underlying an offense must have been intentional. 15.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States v. Willie Tyler, A/K/A "Little Man" Willie Tyler
281 F.3d 84 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Feb 11, 2002
Arnold had established a limited exception to the offense-specific rule where two prosecutions are "closely related.” … Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990), re-established that the government must demonstrate unavailability in such circumstances.
Cited 55 timesPublishedJeffrey Bello v. Edgewater Park Sewerage Author
677 F. App'x 36 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Feb 14, 2017
P. 12(b), concluding that it was immune from suit and that Bello failed to state a viable constitutional challenge to the Sewerage Authorities Law. … Based on, among other things, Bello’s failure to support his motion with evidence or challenge on appeal the District Court’s findings of fact2 (let alone show that any finding is clearly erroneous), we conclude that the
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Dec 16, 2004
The question addressed by the Supreme Court was whether the Louisiana video poker license qualified as “property” within the scope of § 1341. … Such deprivation was clearly set forth in the superseding indictments.
Cited 0 timesPublished91 F.3d 427 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Aug 16, 1996
The court ruled that the prejudicial effect of this statement on co-defendant Garcia outweighed the probative value for Balter to establish fear. … Moreover, the Department of Justice has since promulgated a regulation formally establishing the policy identified in the original memorandum.
Cited 138 timesPublished86 F.3d 1007 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jun 18, 1996
In our view, this statement establishes Kevin neither intended nor expected to be shot. … Clearly, such use falls within Britt 's "normal use" requirement.
Cited 7 timesPublishedQVC, Inc. v. Ourhouseworks, LLC
649 F. App'x 223 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · May 6, 2016
Under Illinois law, the unjust enrichment of a parent corporation qualifies as a “plus” factor. … While EnvirOx appears to dispute some of these findings, it has not established that they were clearly erroneous. See Berg Chilling Sys. v.
Cited 8 timesUnpublished941 F.3d 115 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Oct 28, 2019
It is well- established that one of the automatic stay’s primary purposes is “‘to maintain the status quo between the debtor and [his] creditors, thereby affording the parties and the [Bankruptcy] Court an opportunity to … In sum, the plain language of the automatic stay provision in Section 362(a)(3) and the automatic stay’s legislative purpose indicate that Congress did not intend passive retention to qualify as “an act to . . . exercise
Cited 23 timesPublished148 F.3d 242 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jun 25, 1998
It clearly does not constitute a “traditional” public forum, archetypal examples of which include streets and parks. … Thus, the nature of the forum suggests, but by no means establishes, see Lehman v.
Cited 58 timesPublished
Ask Donna