Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,730 results
1.97s
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Dec 13, 2000
We are assuming here that a constitutional violation occurred and qualified immunity does not apply. … With the officers' liability for violating Hector's Fourth Amendment right established, and their entitlement to qualified immunity blocked, the S 1983 claim was r emanded to the District Court to determine damages.
Cited 0 timesUnknown190 F.3d 125 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Sep 7, 1999
It then granted partial summary judgment in favor of Dardovitch, concluding that he was clearly a beneficiary, and ordered an accounting. See Dist. Ct. … "Although the court will consider that the executor acted upon the advice of counsel in determining whether he acted in good faith, this does not provide the executor with complete immunity to a surcharge."
Cited 73 timesPublished688 F.2d 716 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Sep 27, 1982
Of course, they recognize that it was appropriate for the witnesses for Great Lakes to tell exactly what happened as the tanker bore down on the dredge and its barge, thus clearly showing that it was an act of the large vessel … A concurrent tortfeasor generally may seek contribution from another, id. § 886A, but he is not relieved from liability for the entire damages even when the nondefendant tortfeasor is immune from liability. Id. § 880.
Cited 34 timesPublishedCitizens for Health v. Leavitt
428 F.3d 167 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Oct 31, 2005
In this case, by contrast, the action that Citizens challenge-the promulgation of the Amended Rule by the Secretary-is clearly government conduct. … The right to discriminate, including the right to discriminate on racial grounds, was now embodied in the State's basic charter, immune from legislative, executive, or judicial regulation at any level of the state government
Cited 45 timesPublishedSt. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance Company v. Barbara Lewis
935 F.2d 1428 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jul 24, 1991
It is for the insurer to define, refine, and qualify the terms in its policy to cure any patent or latent ambiguity; the risk of a failure to do so, under Pennsylvania law, rests with the insurer. 6 28 While the majority … By slighting the record and the established standard in this court for granting a directed verdict, the majority has given no more than lip service to the established principles of law which I have outlined at the outset
Cited 97 timesPublished307 F.3d 137 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Sep 20, 2002
These payments could not have been payments for groceries because, as the affidavit clearly sets forth, these stores sold few if any groceries. … We reject the argument that this 11-month gap rendered the information in the affidavit so clearly stale that reasonable officers could not have believed that the warrant was valid. 34 Where "an activity is of a protracted
Cited 43 timesPublishedAnello v. Indian River School District
355 F. App'x 594 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Dec 14, 2009
establish that the § 504 plan had failed, let alone that Indian River violated the IDEA. … Our independent review of the record indicates that this was not clearly erroneous.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAnello v. Indian River School District
355 F. App'x 594 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Dec 14, 2009
establish that the § 504 plan had failed, let alone that Indian River violated the IDEA. … Our independent review of the record indicates that this was not clearly erroneous.
Cited 0 timesPublished633 F.2d 293 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jul 30, 1980
The Instant Proceedings 12 The employer is a sponsor of a qualified pension plan, funded through a tax-qualified trust of which Pittsburgh National Bank is the trustee. The employer is the plan administrator. … obtaining a court order terminating the plan and fixing a date of termination should, the employer urged, be borne by PBGC. 20 PBGC's position at argument was that when the appropriate termination date is contested the court clearly
Cited 0 timesPublishedBetty J. Ashley v. Atlantic Richfield Company
794 F.2d 128 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jul 11, 1986
The Supreme Court did not purport to establish a uniform definition of costs that is coterminous with attorney’s fees. 24 Chesny governs actions in which Rule 68 is invoked. … We recognize, however, that there may be settlements in which the plaintiffs claim clearly appears to be legally or factually non-meritorious and, accordingly, in which it appears that the "some benefit obtained” has been
Disagreed with by a later decision, 71 F.3d 1053 (1995)Cited 67 timesPublished540 F.2d 1171 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Aug 25, 1976
In order to recover, however, the insureds were further obliged to establish the earthquake as the probable cause of the rockslide. … Clearly, we are here faced with an entirely different situation in which the equities dictate a different result — there are no injured third parties, there is no litigation awaiting the outcome of this case, and since the
Cited 178 timesPublished778 F.2d 963 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Dec 6, 1985
On re-direct examination, to rebut defense counsel’s implied charge that Ricci constructed this story as a bargaining chip when Ricci sought immunity from prosecution, the government played a tape recorded conversation between … The court then went on to find that the evidence independent of the taped coconspirators’ statements clearly established the existence of a conspiracy involving all of the defendants at the time of the conversations.
Cited 115 timesPublishedRichard E. Davis Priscilla Davis, His Wife v. Portline Transportes Maritime Internacional
16 F.3d 532 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Mar 28, 1994
Some portions of the Restatement’s approach, however, clearly do not fit within the paradigm the Act constructs. … We think that, once having established a breach of a duty, the record readily establishes the elements of causation and damages, so we may pretermit a protracted discussion of those remaining elements of a negligence claim
Overruled implicitly by Howlett v. Birkdale Shipping Co., S.A., 512 U.S. 92 (1994)Cited 91 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · May 15, 2006
Although petitioners argue that our decision in Patenaude supports their position, that case clearly cuts the other way. … Clearly, the [JPML] has the discretion to remand a case when everything that remains to be done is case-specific.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJoshim Uddin v. Attorney General United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Sep 25, 2017
The INA, in turn, establishes three different kinds of terrorist organizations. … affirmatively establish that BNP leaders authorized the actions that were terroristic. 21
Cited 0 timesPublishedYan Qing Chen v. Attorney General of the United States
349 F. App'x 800 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Oct 22, 2009
To establish eligibility for "withholding of removal, an applicant must demonstrate “a clear probability of persecution.” See Fatin v. INS, 12 F.3d 1233, 1238 (3d Cir.1993). … The BIA’s opinion clearly acknowledged the voluminous record compiled by Chen and concluded that it was insufficient to carry his burden of proof.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilliam H. Hinton v. The Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
844 F.2d 126 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Apr 14, 1988
However, the general non-appealability of discovery orders is well-established. See, e.g., Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 785 F.2d 1108, 1116 (3d Cir.1986); Borden Co. v. Sylk, 410 F.2d 843, 845 (3d Cir.1969); cf. … Moreover, the order at issue fails to qualify as a collateral order under Cohen because it does not conclusively resolve a disputed issue.
Cited 40 timesPublished169 F.2d 770 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Aug 16, 1948
The test, however, is not whether the state court established its decision on cs state ground, but rather whether the state ground was adequate. … Co., 1907, 205 U.S. 1, 11 , 27 S.Ct. 407, 408 , 51 L.Ed. 681 , the Court said: “We certainly do not mean to qualify or limit the rule that, for this court to entertain jurisdiction of a writ of error to a state court, it
Cited 9 timesPublishedKos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corporation Andrx Laboratories, Inc
369 F.3d 700 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · May 24, 2004
“[Physicians are not immune from confusion or mistake.” Id. (quotation omitted); see also Syntex Labs., Inc. v. … not establish a “serious health risk” and its conclusion that “[therefore, the public interest does not favor” injunctive relief.
Cited 666 timesPublishedYan Qing Chen v. Attorney General of the United States
349 F. App'x 800 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Oct 22, 2009
To establish eligibility for "withholding of removal, an applicant must demonstrate “a clear probability of persecution.” See Fatin v. INS, 12 F.3d 1233, 1238 (3d Cir.1993). … The BIA’s opinion clearly acknowledged the voluminous record compiled by Chen and concluded that it was insufficient to carry his burden of proof.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna