Case law

Stern v. General Electric Company

23 F.3d 746 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 16, 1994

Landy, Peter James Clines, Brown & Seymour, New York City, of counsel) for plaintiffs-appellants. Thomas P. Ogden, New York City (Wendy L. Trugman, Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York City, E. Scott Gilbert, Counsel, Gen. … See Stern v. General Elec. Co., 837 F.Supp. 72 (S.D.N.Y.1993); Stern v. General Elec. Co., 1992 WL 138339 (S.D.N.Y.

Gupta v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 11, 2019

See United States v.  … at  169  (quoting  Cupp  v. 

United States v. Lange

834 F.3d 58 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 15, 2016

As a member of the Board, Russell attended a number of Board meetings and general staff meetings where HFGI’s strategy to secure funding for Gulf-Opportunity Zone development projects was discussed. … See United States v.

Liu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

121 F. App'x 917 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 23, 2005

Diallo v. INS, 232 F.3d 279, 287 (2d Cir.2000). … See Zhang v.

Robert Brining & Co. v. Strachan's Southern S. S. Co.

83 F.2d 949 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 1, 1936

The Floridian had been laid up for several yeai;s before it was purchased from the United States Shipping Board in 1928. … Dupont de Nemours & Co. v. American Hawaiian S. S. Co., 41 F.(2d) 226 (D.C.N.D.Cal.); The Cameronia, 38 F.(2d) 522 (D.C.E.D. N.Y.).

Kunwar v. Holder

577 F. App'x 54 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 29, 2014

13-2321 Kunwar v. … Castro v. Holder, 597 F.3d 93, 100 (2d Cir. 2010).

De Rodriguez v. Holder

328 F. App'x 733 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 10, 2009

Ajdin v. Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, 437 F.3d 261, 263 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam). … Rashid v. Mukasey, 533 F.3d 127, 130-31 (2d Cir.2008).

The Eastchester

20 F.2d 357 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 6, 1927

Macklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, of New York City (Horace L. Cheyney, of New York City, of counsel), for libelant appellee. Foley & Martin, of New York City (W. J. … Tracy v. Marks, Lissberger & Son, 283 F. 100 (C. C. A. 2). See, also, Look v. Portsmouth, etc., Ry. (D. C.) 141 F. 182 ; Barber v. Abendroth Bros., 102 N. Y. 406 , 7 N. E. 417 , 55 Am. Rep. 821 ; Neville v.

Docket No. 99-9173 August Term, 1999

225 F.3d 227 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 26, 2000

DISCUSSION 16 In Younger v. … See Deakins v.

Nordlinger v. United States

127 F. 683 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 6, 1904

.- The principal use, as the board finds, is that of its grain as bird food. There is no evidence in the record that it is ever used for any other purpose. It is the well-known canary seed. … And the court cites Robertson v. Salomon, 130 U. S. 412 , 9 Sup. Ct 559, 32 L.

In re John Osborn's Sons & Co.

177 F. 184 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 21, 1910

The subsequent case of Brown v. Lamb, 6 Metc. (Mass.) 203, under the insolvent laws of Massachusetts, did involve the question, but it was not considered, and the decision was rested entirely upon Williams v. … In People v. Trust Co., 187 N. Y. 293 , 79 N.

Hayes v. Coombe

142 F.3d 517 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 9, 1998

See Coleman v. … See Browning-Ferris Indus, v.

LEHIGH & HUDSON RIVER RAILWAY COMPANY v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

38 F.2d 1015 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 10, 1930

The Supreme Court has now decided the case of Lucas, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. American Code Co., Inc., 50 S. Ct. 202 , 74 L. Ed., and reversed our ruling. … As the result, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed in toto.

Alexandervich v. Gallagher Bros. Sand & Gravel Corp.

298 F.2d 918 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 28, 1961

receipt of board and lodging.” … See, e. g., United States v. Price, 4 Cir., 288 F.2d 448 (benefits under the Civil Service Retirement Act); Hudson v.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,549 Irwin Popkin v. Warner B. Bishop

464 F.2d 714 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 29, 1972

In May 1971, Dillon, Read made its recommendations and in that same month the respective boards of the corporations approved the exchange ratios recommended. … Unquestionably this court has recognized that Rule 10b-5 reaches beyond traditional stock transactions and into the board rooms of corporations. See, e. g., Drachman v. Harvey, 453 F.2d 722 (1972) (en banc); SEC v.

Manhat v. United States

220 F.2d 143 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 9, 1955

On the afternoon of April 5, 1951, after libellant had been working on board the “General H. F. … Johnson v. United States, supra.

New York Shipping Association, Inc., International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America

495 F.2d 1215 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 1974

First, he warned against assuming that a maritime agreement “must always fall neatly into either the Labor Board or Maritime Commission domain.” … In Pepsico, Inc. v. FTC, 472 F.2d 179, 187 (2 Cir. 1972) and Ecology Action v.

Devany v. United States

366 F.2d 807 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 13, 1966

DEVANY, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, by its VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, Thomas V. O'Keefe, L. M. Hylton, J. Tannenbaum, A. F. Jacovine, P. C. Carrano, and the Board of Veterans' Appeals, Appellees. No. 17. … See Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U.S. 41 , 58 S.Ct. 459 , 82 L.Ed. 638 (1938). 6 Affirmed.

Johnson v. Nextel Communications Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 4, 2015

McNeil v. Leeds Morelli & Brown, P.C., No. 03‐cv‐893 (Colo. Dist. Ct. Denver County).  Nextel was dismissed from the case.   … See Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591, 614 (1997); Brown v. Kelly, 609 F.3d 467, 476 (2d Cir. 2010).   II.

United States v. Gonzales

282 F. App'x 82 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 24, 2008

United States v. Regalado, 518 F.3d 143 , 150 n. 3 (2d Cir.2008) (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted). … See Gall v. United States, - U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).