Case law

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Talmadge Park

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 23, 2010

09-2601-ag Nat’l Labor Relations Bd. v. … Such was 22 the situation when the Board issued the order that is the 23 subject of this petition. 24 In Snell Island SNF LLC v.

Simon Junger v. Hertz, Neumark & Warner

426 F.2d 805 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1970

See Smith v. Bear, 237 F.2d 79 (2d Cir. 1956); Remar v. Clayton Securities Corp., 81 F.Supp. 1014 (D. Mass.1949); Note, Federal Margin Requirements as a Basis for Civil Liability, 66 Colum.L.Rev. 1462, 1467-71 (1966). … See Sutro Bros. & Co., 41 SEC at 451-52; Meisel v. New Jersey Trust Co., 218 F. Supp. 274, 277 (S.D.N.Y.1963).

EklecCo v. Iron Workers Locals 40, 361, & 417 Union Security Funds

170 F.3d 353 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 22, 1999

According to the Funds, (i) Plumbing Industry Board, Plumbing Local Union No. 1 v. E.W. … v.

USA Recycling, Inc. v. Town of Babylon

66 F.3d 1272 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 19, 1995

The Agency's governing board is appointed by the Babylon Town Board, and each member "serve[s] at the pleasure of the appointing authority.” … Dist. v.

American Cigar Co. v. United States

146 F. 484 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 17, 1906

In the case of American Cigar Company v. United States. … of the Board are properly before this court for review.

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Alitalia Airlines

753 F.2d 3 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 14, 1985

The order of the district court is affirmed for the reasons spelled out in Judge Haight’s Memorandum Opinion and Order below, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers v. … Section 2, Ninth states that on receipt of the National Mediation Board’s certification, “the carrier shall treat with the representative so certi-fied____” (emphasis added).

United States v. Irving Garber

413 F.2d 284 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 11, 1969

As the Supreme Court stated in Parr v. … See United States v. Brown, 301 F.2d 664 (4th Cir. 1962); Holdsworth v. United States, 179 F.2d 933 (1st Cir. 1950).

Watts v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

75 F.2d 981 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 4, 1935

Mead Coal Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. … Zeller-bach Paper Co. v. Helvering, 293 U. S. 172 , 55 S. Ct. 127 , 79 L. Ed. -; United States v. Dakota-Montana Oil Co., 288 U. S. 459 , 53 S. Ct. 435 , 77 L. Ed. 893 ; Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v.

Stevens v. Carl Schmid, Inc.

73 F.2d 54 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 17, 1934

See Schey v. Giovanna, 273 F. 515, 516 (C. C. A. 2). … See Winans v. Denmead, 15 How. 330, 343 , 14 L. Ed. 717 ; United States v. Societe Anonyme, etc., 224 U. S. 309 ; 328, 32 S. Ct. 479 , 56 L. Ed. 778 .

Elmco Properties, Incorporated v. Second National Federal Savings Association

94 F.3d 914 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 3, 1996

E.g., Boley v. Brown, 10 F.3d 218, 222 (4th Cir.1993) (citing Mullane v. … Mullane, 339 U.S. at 314 , 70 S.Ct. at 657 ; accord Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791, 795 , 103 S.Ct. 2706, 2709-10 , 77 L.Ed.2d 180 (1983).

Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Pedrick. Babcock & Wilcox Tube Co. v. Pedrick

212 F.2d 645 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 7, 1954

“The Internal Revenue Code, not general equitable principles, is the mainspring of the Board’s jurisdiction.” C. I. R. v. Gooch Milling & Elevator Co., 320 U.S. 418, 422 , 64 S.Ct. 184, 186 , 88 L.Ed. 139 . … So on a taxpayer’s appeal from the commissioner’s determination of a deficiency in tax for 1936, the Board was held without jurisdiction to determine the amount of a 1935 overpayment. C. I. R. v.

Pettus v. Morgenthau

554 F.3d 293 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 28, 2009

BROWN,** JONATHAN D. … See Pettus v. Brown, No. 08-3646-pr (2d Cir. Oct. 10, 2008).

Cannella v. United States

179 F.2d 491 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 18, 1950

. § 741 et seq., to recover for personal injuries suffered by the libellant, a longshoreman, while on board a ship, of which the United States was “bare-boat charterer.” … Cannella v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co., 2 Cir., 174 F.2d 794 . 2 . Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp. v. N. Y. Central R. R.. Co., 2 Cir., 126 F.2d 992 .

William A. Brady Theatre Co. v. Commissioner

42 F.2d 181 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 9, 1930

It is probably true, as Judge Westenhaver said in Fuller & Smith v. Routzahn (D. … Fuller & Smith v. Boutzahn (D. C.) 23 F.(2d) 959 .

Thomson v. Odyssey House

652 F. App'x 44 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 16, 2016

15-3363 Thomson v. … See Smith v.

United States ex rel. Perez-Varella v. Esperdy

285 F.2d 723 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 22, 1960

The petitioner is a sailor, serving as a cook on board a “training ship” of the Spanish Navy. He arrived in Miami last March and was allowed with the other members of the crew the usual sightseeing visits ashore. … A list of over forty such treaties appears in Tucker v. Alexandroff, 183 U.S. 424, 461, 462 , 22 S.Ct. 195 , 46 L.Ed. 264 .

United States v. Jose Gonzalez and Jose Vicente Costano

555 F.2d 308 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1977

As he left the cab he wrapped a magazine around a brown bag which he held in his hands. … Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 231 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973). This was a reaffirmation of the rulings in Schneble v.

Robert Murphy v. New Milford Zoning Commission

402 F.3d 342 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 25, 2005

An appeal to the Zoning Board of Appeals surely would have illuminated at least some, if not all, of these vexing issues. See R & R Pool & Patio v. … In fact, a zoning board of appeals "`is in the most advantageous position to interpret its own regulations and apply them to the situations before it.' " Id. (quoting Doyen v.

Thomas Garcia v. Hazel Lewis, Superintendent, Hale Creek Correctional Facility

188 F.3d 71 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 12, 1999

v. … Brown, 142 F.3d at 543 ; see also Reed v. Farley, 512 U.S. 339, 349 , 114 S.Ct. 2291 , 129 L.Ed.2d 277 (1994).

The Interstate No. 1

290 F. 926 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 16, 1923

In the Frank Richard & Gardner Co. v. … After referring to the decision of Judge Brown in The Gratitude, Judge Lynch said: “This 40-day rule was not followed in this district by Judge Green in the case of the tug Wm. O.