Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

4.86s

  • Keeveny v. McCormack

    266 F. 314 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 14, 1920

    The Shipping Board refused to permit the sale. … See Mooney v. Elder, 56 N. Y. 238 , and Duclos v. Cunningham, 102 N. Y. 678 , 6 N. E. 790 . Judgment reversed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • J.C., by His Parents and Next Friend, Mr. And Mrs. C., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Regional School District 10, Board of Education, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

    278 F.3d 119 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 24, 2002

    C., Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 10, BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Docket No. 00-9484(XAP). Docket No. 00-9484(LEAD). … J.C. v. Reg. Sch. Dist. No. 10, 115 F.Supp.2d 297 (D.Conn.2000). 2 Following the District Court's decision and the Board's notice of appeal, the Supreme Court decided Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hock v. 250 Northern Ave. Corp.

    142 F.2d 435 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 17, 1944

    Neustein v. Mitchell, 2 Cir., 130 F.2d 197 . Turning to the provisions of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, we can find no provision conferring jurisdiction on the district courts over such an action as this. … Henderson v. Fleckinger, 5 Cir., 136 F.2d 381 ; Brown v. Wright, 4 Cir., 137 F.2d 484 ; Bowles v. Willingham, 64 S.Ct. 641 . Only subsection (e) provides for a suit by a private plaintiff.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. County of Erie

    751 F.2d 79 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 12, 1984

    See, e.g., Marshall v. Board of Education, 470 F.Supp. 517, 519 (D.Md.1979), aff'd, 618 F.2d 101 (4th Cir. 1980). … See Marshall v. Board of Education, 470 F.Supp. at 519 ; Brennan v. Board of Education, 374 F.Supp. 817 (D.N.J.1974). Accordingly, the present appeal is largely governed by this Court’s recent decision in Donovan v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. County Waste of Ulster, LLC

    455 F. App'x 32 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 6, 2012

    10-3359-ag (L) NLRB v. … United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Lambus

    897 F.3d 368 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 25, 2018

    Hubert 8 Browne. … Browne and Bureau Chief Parker, however, the monitoring 6 decision had been made by Parker after conferring with Browne (see Apr. 11, 2017 7 Tr. 139; Apr. 10, 2017 Tr. 89); and Browne testified that while the immediate

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Rios v. Enterprise Ass'n Steamfitters Local 638 of U.A.

    501 F.2d 622 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 24, 1974

    Doremus v. … Chance v. Board of Examiners, 458 F.2d 1167, 1178 (2d Cir. 1972). The criteria established by the district court for selecting A Branch members appear to be both reasonable and objective.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • United States v. Joseph Stassi, A/K/A Joe Rogers

    544 F.2d 579 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 26, 1976

    This information was confirmed by an Intelligence Analyst of the Eastern District Strike Force, who was investigating Otvos on behalf of the Parole Board. … Appellants’ contention that the Parole Board’s negligence must be imputed to the prosecution was properly rejected by the District Judge. United States v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Bickford's, Inc. v. Helvering

    98 F.2d 568 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 18, 1938

    The Board held with the respondent and the taxpayer appealed. It is quite true that § 112(i), 26 U.S. … Its theory is that this was the equivalent of payment under the ruling in United States v. Hendler, 303 U.S. 564 , 58 S.Ct. 655 , 82 L.Ed. 1018 , and that § 113(a) (7) added such increases.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Intercontinental Container Transport Corporation v. New York Shipping Association, Inc. And International Longshoremen's Association

    426 F.2d 884 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 5, 1970

    and, seeking an entirely different remedy, the court must defer to the Board. … United States v. Hutcheson, 312 U.S. 219 , 61 S.Ct. 463 , 85 L.Ed. 788 (1941); Allen Bradley Co. v. Local 3, supra.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Angelus Milling Co. v. Nunan

    144 F.2d 469 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 6, 1944

    Congress abolished the Board on December 31, 1942, and transferred its jurisdiction to the Board of Tax Appeals— now the Tax Court of the United States— and on January 29, 1943, the Commissioner renewed his motion which this … Co. v. United States, 48 F.2d 973 , 71 Ct.Cls. 628; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. United States, 49 F.2d 662 , 72 Ct.Cl. 204 ; Wausau Sulphate Fibre Co. v. United States, 49 F.2d 665 , 72 Ct.Cl. 189 ; Solomon v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • EklecCo v. Iron Workers Locals 40, 361, & 417 Union Security Funds

    170 F.3d 353 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 22, 1999

    According to the Funds, (i) Plumbing Industry Board, Plumbing Local Union No. 1 v. E.W. … v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Irving Garber

    413 F.2d 284 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 11, 1969

    As the Supreme Court stated in Parr v. … See United States v. Brown, 301 F.2d 664 (4th Cir. 1962); Holdsworth v. United States, 179 F.2d 933 (1st Cir. 1950).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Crown Coat Front Co., Inc. v. United States

    395 F.2d 160 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 14, 1968

    See, e. g., United States v. Utah Constr. & Mining Co., 384 U.S. 394 , 86 S.Ct. 1545 , 16 L.Ed.2d 642 (1966); Len Co. and Associates v. United States, 385 F.2d 438 , 181 Ct.Cl. 29 (1967); Nager Elec. Co. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Simon Junger v. Hertz, Neumark & Warner

    426 F.2d 805 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1970

    See Smith v. Bear, 237 F.2d 79 (2d Cir. 1956); Remar v. Clayton Securities Corp., 81 F.Supp. 1014 (D. Mass.1949); Note, Federal Margin Requirements as a Basis for Civil Liability, 66 Colum.L.Rev. 1462, 1467-71 (1966). … See Sutro Bros. & Co., 41 SEC at 451-52; Meisel v. New Jersey Trust Co., 218 F. Supp. 274, 277 (S.D.N.Y.1963).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • USA Recycling, Inc. v. Town of Babylon

    66 F.3d 1272 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 19, 1995

    The Agency's governing board is appointed by the Babylon Town Board, and each member "serve[s] at the pleasure of the appointing authority.” … Dist. v.

    Cited 75 timesPublished
  • United States v. Torres

    740 F.2d 122 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 17, 1984

    An unsealed brown paper bag containing $1,203 in cash and over one-half kilogram of approximately 50% pure cocaine was also found on the floor. … Dunaway v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • American Cigar Co. v. United States

    146 F. 484 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 17, 1906

    In the case of American Cigar Company v. United States. … of the Board are properly before this court for review.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Alitalia Airlines

    753 F.2d 3 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 14, 1985

    The order of the district court is affirmed for the reasons spelled out in Judge Haight’s Memorandum Opinion and Order below, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers v. … Section 2, Ninth states that on receipt of the National Mediation Board’s certification, “the carrier shall treat with the representative so certi-fied____” (emphasis added).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Barr

    943 F.3d 134 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 21, 2019

    15‐3728(L) Rodriguez v. … United States v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.