Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.25s
Petition of Sooren Alexander Skender, for Naturalization. Sooren Alexander Skender v. United States
248 F.2d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 6, 1957
The case is distinguishable from Moser v. … That theory has support in United States v. Bazan, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 108 , 228 F.2d 455 ; Ballester (Pons) v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Yee Loy Gee v. Pierce
289 F. 233 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 26, 1923
But we have nothing to do with the propriety of the board’s actual decision; it is enough that the statute gives them the final word. … Ordinarily, in such a case, under Chin Yow v. U. S., 208 U. S. 8 , 28 Sup. Ct. 201, 52 L. Ed. 369 , the proper practice is for the court to determine for itself whether the alien is entitled to admission.
Cited 2 timesPublished347 F.2d 149 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 21, 1965
V), § 155(c). 1 The Board of lia *151 migration Appeals affirmed the denial of suspension at that time. … Hintopoulos v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedJohn A. McWilliams v. New York City Board of Education
101 F.3d 682 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 15, 1996
McWILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-9047. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. April 15, 1996. APPEARING FOR APPELLANT: John A. … McWilliams v. New York City Bd. of Education, No. 94-9007 (2d Cir. May 9, 1994). On that appeal, we noted that his claim was not filed administratively, as required, within 300 days of the alleged discrimination.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished210 F. App'x 115 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 26, 2006
Under the rule announced in Apprendi v. … See Brown v. Miller, 451 F.3d 54 (2d Cir.2006); Brown v. Greiner, 409 F.3d 523, 534-35 (2d Cir.2005). In Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKessler v. Grand Central District Management Ass'n, Inc.
158 F.3d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 13, 1998
Board of Estimate v. Morris, 489 U.S. 688, 693 , 109 S.Ct. 1433 , 103 L.Ed.2d 717 (1989) (quoting Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. at 565 , 84 S.Ct. 1362 ). The Court in Reynolds v. … See, e.g., Board of Estimate v. Morris, 489 U.S. at 692-93 , 109 S.Ct. 1433 ; Hadley v. Junior College District, 397 U.S. 50, 54 , 90 S.Ct. 791 , 25 L.Ed.2d 45 (1970); Avery v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States v. Robert Archibald
734 F.2d 938 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 16, 1984
Perhaps the case which has considered the question most carefully in this circuit is United States v. Brown, 699 F.2d 585, 593-94 (2d Cir.1983). In Brown , there was no pretrial lineup. … Archibald did not exactly seek the remedy prescribed in Brown .
Modified by United States v. Archibald, 756 F.2d 223 (1984)Cited 97 timesPublishedConsolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. v. Pataki
292 F.3d 338 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 5, 2002
Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v. … The Supreme Court has held that the constitutional prohibition reaches both See United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 447 , 85 S.Ct. 1707 , 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965); Fletcher v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedInternational Society For Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. J. Roger Barber
650 F.2d 430 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 3, 1981
Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961), or upon Mormons to practice polygamy, United States v. … Brown, supra (Sunday closing law does not prevent Orthodox Jew from observing the Sabbath); Corporation of Presiding Bishop v.
Cited 3 timesPublished139 F.2d 231 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 18, 1943
Brown, v. … Board of Education, 217 N.Y. 470 , 112 N.E. 167 ; 1 Williston on Contracts, Rev.Ed. 1936, § 278A.
Cited 8 timesPublished593 F.3d 226 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 28, 2010
See Zerilli-Edelglass v. New York City Transit Auth., 333 F.3d 74, 80 (2d Cir.2003) (untimely EEOC complaint); Brown v. Parkchester S. Condos., 287 F.3d 58, 60 (2d Cir.2002) (untimely Title VII complaint); Boos v. … Brown, 287 F.3d at 60 (internal quotation marks omitted).
Cited 116 timesPublishedN. Am. Soccer League, LLC v. U.S. Soccer Fed'n, Inc.
883 F.3d 32 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 23, 2018
See Holt v. … v.
Cited 275 timesPublishedBernard Ryan and Robert Ryan, D/B/A Ryan Fruit Company v. St. Johnsbury & Lamoille County Railroad
290 F.2d 350 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 3, 1961
Vermont makes it the duty of the State Highway Board to erect and maintain danger signs on state highways and prohibits others from doing so without the Board’s consent, 19 Vermont .Stat. Ann. §§ 1, 4(10), 25, 26. … In Contino v. Baltimore & Annapolis R.
Cited 2 timesPublished405 F.2d 215 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 30, 1968
See Subin v. Goldsmith, supra, 224 F.2d at 757. See also Poller v. … Ruckle v. Roto Amer. Corp., 339 F.2d 24 (2d Cir. 1964); Hooper v. Mountain States Sec. Corp., 282 F. 2d 195 (5th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 814 , 81 S.Ct. 695 , 5 L.Ed.2d 693 (1961). In Ruckle v. Roto Amer.
Cited 211 timesPublishedFed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,217 United States of America v. Milton Cohen
518 F.2d 727 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 26, 1975
United States v. Koss, supra; United States v. Sperling, supra; United States v. Bynum, supra; United States v. … United States v. Brown, 511 F.2d 920, 924 (2 Cir. 1975); United States v. Fernandez, 480 F.2d 726, 740 (2 Cir. 1973). Convictions affirmed. 1 .
Cited 39 timesPublished249 F. App'x 210 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 16, 2007
The alleged complaints against Appellant, by contrast, did not come to the Board’s attention until the meeting at which the Board considered her tenure application. … In this respect we note that after the Board’s February/March 2002 meeting, when the Board decided not to grant Appellant tenure, the School District offered Appellant a contract called a "Juul agreement,” see Juul v.
Cited 26 timesPublished306 F.2d 534 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 30, 1962
B. v. … B. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Wissahickon Tool Works, Inc.
200 F.2d 936 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 23, 1952
Leonard v. Prince Line, 2 Cir., 157 F.2d 987, 989 ; Murphy v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 2 Cir., 158 F.2d 481, 485 ; Binder v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Ass’n of America, 2 Cir.; 165 F.2d 896, 901 ; Markert v. … Defendants’ objections to the actions of the Boards involve determinations of the amount of liability and thus fall squarely within the orbit of exclusive Tax Court review. See Lichter v.
Cited 17 timesPublished301 F.2d 458 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 28, 1962
301 F.2d 458 Aleen CHABOT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMPIRE TRUST COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and National Securities & Research Corporation, Defendant. Seymour SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … The decision in Brown v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415 (2d Cir. 1961) has answered that question in favor of federal jurisdiction. 4 Chabot v. Empire Trust Company, 189 F.Supp. 666 (S.D.N.Y.1960).
Cited 0 timesPublishedRuben Dario Rosario v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
962 F.2d 220 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 27, 1992
Appellant filed the instant petition for review, and two days later filed with the Board a motion to reopen his case. By decision dated August 7, 1991 the Board denied the motion to reopen. … Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 , 843 n. 9, 104 S.Ct. 2778 , 2781 n. 9, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); De Los Santos v. INS, 690 F.2d 56, 59 (2d Cir.1982).
Cited 54 timesPublished
Ask Donna