Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

3.25s

  • Petition of Sooren Alexander Skender, for Naturalization. Sooren Alexander Skender v. United States

    248 F.2d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 6, 1957

    The case is distinguishable from Moser v. … That theory has support in United States v. Bazan, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 108 , 228 F.2d 455 ; Ballester (Pons) v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • United States ex rel. Yee Loy Gee v. Pierce

    289 F. 233 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 26, 1923

    But we have nothing to do with the propriety of the board’s actual decision; it is enough that the statute gives them the final word. … Ordinarily, in such a case, under Chin Yow v. U. S., 208 U. S. 8 , 28 Sup. Ct. 201, 52 L. Ed. 369 , the proper practice is for the court to determine for itself whether the alien is entitled to admission.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States Ex Rel. Sirijo Tanfara, Relator-Appellant v. P. A. Esperdy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service

    347 F.2d 149 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 21, 1965

    V), § 155(c). 1 The Board of lia *151 migration Appeals affirmed the denial of suspension at that time. … Hintopoulos v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • John A. McWilliams v. New York City Board of Education

    101 F.3d 682 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 15, 1996

    McWILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-9047. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. April 15, 1996. APPEARING FOR APPELLANT: John A. … McWilliams v. New York City Bd. of Education, No. 94-9007 (2d Cir. May 9, 1994). On that appeal, we noted that his claim was not filed administratively, as required, within 300 days of the alleged discrimination.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Witherspoon v. Woods

    210 F. App'x 115 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 26, 2006

    Under the rule announced in Apprendi v. … See Brown v. Miller, 451 F.3d 54 (2d Cir.2006); Brown v. Greiner, 409 F.3d 523, 534-35 (2d Cir.2005). In Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kessler v. Grand Central District Management Ass'n, Inc.

    158 F.3d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 13, 1998

    Board of Estimate v. Morris, 489 U.S. 688, 693 , 109 S.Ct. 1433 , 103 L.Ed.2d 717 (1989) (quoting Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. at 565 , 84 S.Ct. 1362 ). The Court in Reynolds v. … See, e.g., Board of Estimate v. Morris, 489 U.S. at 692-93 , 109 S.Ct. 1433 ; Hadley v. Junior College District, 397 U.S. 50, 54 , 90 S.Ct. 791 , 25 L.Ed.2d 45 (1970); Avery v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States v. Robert Archibald

    734 F.2d 938 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 16, 1984

    Perhaps the case which has considered the question most carefully in this circuit is United States v. Brown, 699 F.2d 585, 593-94 (2d Cir.1983). In Brown , there was no pretrial lineup. … Archibald did not exactly seek the remedy prescribed in Brown .

    Modified by United States v. Archibald, 756 F.2d 223 (1984)Cited 97 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. v. Pataki

    292 F.3d 338 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 5, 2002

    Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v. … The Supreme Court has held that the constitutional prohibition reaches both See United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 447 , 85 S.Ct. 1707 , 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965); Fletcher v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • International Society For Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. J. Roger Barber

    650 F.2d 430 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 3, 1981

    Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961), or upon Mormons to practice polygamy, United States v. … Brown, supra (Sunday closing law does not prevent Orthodox Jew from observing the Sabbath); Corporation of Presiding Bishop v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pape v. Home Ins. Co.

    139 F.2d 231 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 18, 1943

    Brown, v. … Board of Education, 217 N.Y. 470 , 112 N.E. 167 ; 1 Williston on Contracts, Rev.Ed. 1936, § 278A.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bolarinwa v. Williams

    593 F.3d 226 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 28, 2010

    See Zerilli-Edelglass v. New York City Transit Auth., 333 F.3d 74, 80 (2d Cir.2003) (untimely EEOC complaint); Brown v. Parkchester S. Condos., 287 F.3d 58, 60 (2d Cir.2002) (untimely Title VII complaint); Boos v. … Brown, 287 F.3d at 60 (internal quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 116 timesPublished
  • N. Am. Soccer League, LLC v. U.S. Soccer Fed'n, Inc.

    883 F.3d 32 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 23, 2018

    See Holt v.  … v. 

    Cited 275 timesPublished
  • Bernard Ryan and Robert Ryan, D/B/A Ryan Fruit Company v. St. Johnsbury & Lamoille County Railroad

    290 F.2d 350 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 3, 1961

    Vermont makes it the duty of the State Highway Board to erect and maintain danger signs on state highways and prohibits others from doing so without the Board’s consent, 19 Vermont .Stat. Ann. §§ 1, 4(10), 25, 26. … In Contino v. Baltimore & Annapolis R.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Schoenbaum v. Firstbrook

    405 F.2d 215 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 30, 1968

    See Subin v. Goldsmith, supra, 224 F.2d at 757. See also Poller v. … Ruckle v. Roto Amer. Corp., 339 F.2d 24 (2d Cir. 1964); Hooper v. Mountain States Sec. Corp., 282 F. 2d 195 (5th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 814 , 81 S.Ct. 695 , 5 L.Ed.2d 693 (1961). In Ruckle v. Roto Amer.

    Cited 211 timesPublished
  • Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,217 United States of America v. Milton Cohen

    518 F.2d 727 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 26, 1975

    United States v. Koss, supra; United States v. Sperling, supra; United States v. Bynum, supra; United States v. … United States v. Brown, 511 F.2d 920, 924 (2 Cir. 1975); United States v. Fernandez, 480 F.2d 726, 740 (2 Cir. 1973). Convictions affirmed. 1 .

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Prestopnik v. Whelan

    249 F. App'x 210 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 16, 2007

    The alleged complaints against Appellant, by contrast, did not come to the Board’s attention until the meeting at which the Board considered her tenure application. … In this respect we note that after the Board’s February/March 2002 meeting, when the Board decided not to grant Appellant tenure, the School District offered Appellant a contract called a "Juul agreement,” see Juul v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • United States v. Wissahickon Tool Works, Inc.

    200 F.2d 936 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 23, 1952

    Leonard v. Prince Line, 2 Cir., 157 F.2d 987, 989 ; Murphy v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 2 Cir., 158 F.2d 481, 485 ; Binder v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Ass’n of America, 2 Cir.; 165 F.2d 896, 901 ; Markert v. … Defendants’ objections to the actions of the Boards involve determinations of the amount of liability and thus fall squarely within the orbit of exclusive Tax Court review. See Lichter v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Aleen Chabot v. Empire Trust Company, and National Securities & Research Corporation, Seymour Schwartz v. National Securities & Research Corporation, and Empire Trust Company

    301 F.2d 458 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 28, 1962

    301 F.2d 458 Aleen CHABOT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMPIRE TRUST COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and National Securities & Research Corporation, Defendant. Seymour SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … The decision in Brown v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415 (2d Cir. 1961) has answered that question in favor of federal jurisdiction. 4 Chabot v. Empire Trust Company, 189 F.Supp. 666 (S.D.N.Y.1960).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ruben Dario Rosario v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

    962 F.2d 220 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 27, 1992

    Appellant filed the instant petition for review, and two days later filed with the Board a motion to reopen his case. By decision dated August 7, 1991 the Board denied the motion to reopen. … Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 , 843 n. 9, 104 S.Ct. 2778 , 2781 n. 9, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); De Los Santos v. INS, 690 F.2d 56, 59 (2d Cir.1982).

    Cited 54 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.