Case law

Kuck v. Danaher

600 F.3d 159 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 23, 2010

08-5368-cv Kuck v. … Curley v.

United States of America Ex Rel. Neil Bruce Checkman v. Hon. Melvin Laird, Secretary of Defense

469 F.2d 773 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 27, 1972

United States v. Purvis, 403 F.2d 555, 563 (2d Cir. 1968); United States v. Mantoine (71 Cr. 662, S.D.N.Y., Jan. 5, 1972). E. Board’s determination of insincerity 1. … United States v. Lenhard, supra; Paszel v. Laird, supra. See Joseph v. United States, supra. 2.

In Re Bush Terminal Co.

78 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 15, 1935

Wilkins v. M. Ascher Silk Corporation, 207 App. Div. 168 , 201 N. Y. S. 739, affirmed *664 237 N. Y. 574 , 143 N. E. 748 ; People v. Central Fish Co., 117 App. Div. 77 , 101 N. Y. S. 1108. Section 77B, subsec. … , for the board of directors is the representative of the stockholders.

Interport Pilots Agency, Inc. v. Sammis

14 F.3d 133 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 10, 1994

Board of Parole, 543 F.2d 240, 244 (D.C.Cir.1976) (citing Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892 (1944); Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. … Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v.

National Labor Relations Board v. International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Merrit Graham Lodge No. 1871

575 F.2d 54 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 17, 1978

See NLRB v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Local 1029, 409 U.S. 213, 216-18 , 93 S.Ct. 385 , 34 L.Ed.2d 422 (1972); NLRB v. Martin A. Gleason, Inc., 534 F.2d 466 , 476 (2d Cir. 1976). … The order of the Board is enforced. 1 .

Alom v. Whitaker

910 F.3d 708 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 17, 2018

17-2627 (L) Alom v. … See Yueqing Zhang v.

Genesco, Inc. v. Joint Council 13, United Shoe Workers Of America, Afl-Cio

341 F.2d 482 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 5, 1965

NLRB v. … Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Co., 356 U.S. 481, 497-500 , 78 S.Ct. 851 , 2 L.Ed.2d 926 (1958) 4 As to an employer the right of insistence may be overcome by a majority control clause. See NLRB v.

Dlc Management Corp. v. Town Of Hyde Park

163 F.3d 124 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 15, 1998

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … In the Matter of Pete Drown Inc. v. Town Board of the Town of Ellenburg, 229 A.D.2d 877, 879 , 646 N.Y.S.2d 205, 206 (3d Dep't 1996).

Wooten-Francis v. NYC Department of Education/Board of Education

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 14, 2015

14-401-cv Wooten-Francis v. … Appellant Anita V. 

Madhukant Jinabhai Mehta v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

574 F.2d 701 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 6, 1978

In Heitland v. … However, the Board’s interpretation of an INS regulation is entitled to considerable weight. See Heitland v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, supra, 551 F.2d at 499 .

Edward Nason v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

394 F.2d 223 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 29, 1968

We agreed with petitioner (one judge dissenting), reversed the Board and remanded the case for a determination on the entire record. Nason v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 370 F.2d 865 (2nd Cir. 1967). … See Wood v. Hoy, 266 F.2d 825 (9th Cir. 1959); Zito v. Moutal, 174 F.Supp. 531 (N.D.Ill.1959).

Lloyd Royal Belge Societe Anonyme v. Elting

61 F.2d 745 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 7, 1932

National Lead Co. v. United States, 252 *747 U. S. 140, 40 S. Ct. 237 , 64 L. Ed. 496 ; First Natl. Bank of Anamoose v. United States, 206 F. 374, 379 , 46 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1139 (C. C. A. 8); Robertson v. … Section 20 imposes an absolute duty upon each of the persons named in the section to detain the alien seaman on board if properly required so to do. United States v. J. H. Winchester & Co., Inc., 40 F.(2d) 472 (C. C.

Heagney v. Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal

190 F.2d 976 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 30, 1951

Discussing the prior cases, he points out that in Brassel v. … Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co., 255 App.Div. 896 , 7 N.Y.S.2d 456 ; Haglund v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co., 255 App.Div. 895 , 7 N.Y.S.2d 465 ; Agne v.

Ernest Francis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

532 F.2d 268 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 9, 1976

Stanton v. Stanton, 421 U.S. 7, 14 , 95 S.Ct. 1373, 1377 , 43 L.Ed.2d 688, 694 (1975); Royster Guano Co. v. … Oliver v. INS, 517 F.2d 426, 428 (2d Cir. 1975); Bronsztejn v.

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Flight Engineers' International Association

306 F.2d 840 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 25, 1962

Ry. v. … Ry. v.

Christ the King Regional High School v. Culvert

815 F.2d 219 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 26, 1987

See Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 315 U.S. 740, 746-50 , 62 S.Ct. 820, 824-26 , 86 L.Ed. 1154 (1942). In NLRB v. … In NLRB v.

Johnson v. Nicholson

349 F. App'x 604 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 19, 2009

United States v. Freitag, 230 F.3d 1019, 1023 (7th Cir.2000); see also United *606 States v. … Even if Brown was selected for her potential, that does not help establish that Johnson was better qualified than Brown or that the selection of Brown over Johnson was discriminatory.

Time, Inc. v. United States Postal Service

685 F.2d 760 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 9, 1982

In Newsweek, Inc. v. … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 464 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Bowman Transp., Inc. v.

McKinney v. City of Middletown

712 F. App'x 97 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 27, 2018

Even where “most of the facts concerning the application of force are undisputed,” Brown v. … See Brown, 798 F.3d at 103 (leaving “the factual determination of excessiveness to a jury”); Breen v. Garrison, 169 F.3d 152, 153 (2d Cir. 1999) (same).

Norman A. Johnson v. John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service

378 F.3d 164 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 5, 2004

See, e.g., Wiedersperg v. … While the Board is free to modify its precedents in a reasoned fashion, it acts arbitrarily and unlawfully when it simply ignores established holdings. 9 See, e.g., Ke Zhen Zhao v.