Case law

United States v. Charles Baker

487 F.2d 360 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 7, 1973

I am also going to make the defendant eligible for parole at such time as the Board of Parole may determine. … See United States v. Brown, 470 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Wilson, 450 F.2d 495 (4th Cir. 1971) ; *363 Briscoe v. United States, 129 U.S.App. D.C. 146, 391 F.2d 984 (1968).

In re Southern Textile Co.

174 F. 523 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 7, 1909

Brown v. Dail, 117 N. C. 41 , 23 S. E. 45. … We are unable to differentiate the contract in this case at bar from the one thus construed in Brown v.

Roth v. Armistice Capital, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 28, 2025

24-950 Roth v. … (USA) LLC v. Simmonds, 566 U.S. 221, 223 (2012).

McLeod v. Local 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers

345 F.2d 142 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 5, 1965

In entertaining the petition we do not permit the Board “ ‘carte blanche to expand the charge as they might please, or to ignore it altogether.’ ” NLRB v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Plumbers Union, 299 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1962).

Basciano v. Herkimer

605 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 15, 1978

Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division v. Craft, 436 U.S. 1, 9-12 (1978); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972). … Justice Powell’s formulation in Mathews v.

United States v. Ralph Mercado

478 F.2d 1108 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 10, 1973

Upon receiving notification that Mercado had refused to step forward on this ground, his local board prepared to consider his claim, as it was required to do under this court’s decision in United States v. … When Mercado appeared at his local board on May 12, the board, pursuant to a post-jEhlert local board memorandum, *1110 informed him that it could not consider his claim for , conscientious objection, and set a new date,

Chuks Goddy Nwogu v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States

491 F.3d 80 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 19, 2007

See Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. … We are “ ‘precluded from passing on the merits of the underlying exclusion proceedings,’ ” Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam)(quoting Zhao, 265 F.3d at 90); see also Stone v.

D.A. Collins Construction Co., Inc. v. Secretary of Labor

117 F.3d 691 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 1, 1997

. & Gas Corp. v. … See Power Plant Div., Brown & Root, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Comm’n, 659 F.2d 1291 , 1293 & n. 3 (5th Cir.

Jaffee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

45 F.2d 679 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 8, 1930

S. v. Kemp (C. C. A.) 12 F.(2d) 7 ] by the board of directors through its agents, hut the agents actually participated in the execution of which his signing was a part. … Co. v. U. S., 280 U. S. 453 , 50 S. Ct. 215 , 74 L. Ed. 542 . In Joy Floral Co. v. Commissioner, 58 App. D.

United States ex rel. Reel v. Badt

141 F.2d 845 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 13, 1944

The decision in Bowles v. … Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32, 46 , 44 S.Ct. 283 , 68 L.Ed. 549 ; United States ex rel. Di Paola v. Reimer, 2 Cir., 102 F.2d 40, 42 .

United States v. Arno Sascha Jakobson

325 F.2d 409 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 22, 1963

v. … Levy v.

Mahoney v. Hankin

844 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 12, 1988

Law Rep. 510 Donald MAHONEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph N. … County of Westchester v.

Mahoney v. Hankin

844 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 12, 1988

Anderson v. Creighton, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 3034, 3038 , 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987). … See Group Health Inc. v. Blue Cross Ass’n, 793 F.2d 491, 497 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 1566 , 94 L.Ed.2d 758 (1987); see also Bolden v.

Horst v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

107 F.2d 906 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 13, 1939

-The Board’s decision is also in substance contrary to Matchette v. … The Board quotes a passage from Bing v. Bowers, D.C., 22 F.2d 450 , affirmed on the opinion below in 2 Cir., 26 F.2d 1017 .

Local 1545 v. Vincent

286 F.2d 127 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 19, 1960

Since Leedom v. … In Farmer v.

United States v. Christopher Patrick, Linda Taylor and Christopher Patrick

899 F.2d 169 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 27, 1990

Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975), involved a defendant who had been illegally arrested and confessed some hours later. … Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200, 216-17 , 99 S.Ct. 2248, 2258-59 , 60 L.Ed.2d 824 (1979); Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 601-03 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2260-61 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); United States v.

Bryant & Stratton Business Institute, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw,intervenor. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. National Labor Relations Board, Bryant & Stratton Business Institute, Inc., Intervenor. Bryant & Stratton Business Institute, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw, Intervenor

140 F.3d 169 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 24, 1998

PARKER, Circuit Judge: 1 The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or the "Board") seeks, on cross-petition, to enforce its orders entered August 23, 1996 (Chairman Gould, Members Browning and Cohen, Panel ) and April 8, … . v.

O'DOnnell v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

200 F.2d 929 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 1953

The second go to the -boards of adjustment under the direction of the National Railroad Adjustment Board, 45 U.S.C. §§ 152 , 183, 184. The distinction was carefully pointed out and explained in Elgin, J. & E. Ry. Co. v. … In Brink v.

McKinney v. City of Middletown

712 F. App'x 97 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 27, 2018

Even where “most of the facts concerning the application of force are undisputed,” Brown v. … See Brown, 798 F.3d at 103 (leaving “the factual determination of excessiveness to a jury”); Breen v. Garrison, 169 F.3d 152, 153 (2d Cir. 1999) (same).

McLeod v. Drivers & Chauffeurs Local Union No. 816, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America

277 F.2d 800 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 26, 1960

We think Judge Ryan was correct in concluding that the plaintiff Regional Director of the Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board had reasonable cause to believe that the defendant had committed an unfair labor … Accordingly the issuance of the injunction pending the Board hearing was proper under the National Labor Relations Act § 10(Z), 29 U.S.C. § 160 (f). Affirmed.