Case law

Azmond Ali v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States

448 F.3d 515 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 12, 2006

Id. at 135; see also Cekic v. … See Enriquez-Alvarado v.

United States v. Ruggiero

100 F.3d 284 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 19, 1996

In United States v. … In United States v.

Raichle v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York

34 F.2d 910 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 15, 1929

Such a situation under familiar principles renders the Federal Reserve Board an indispensable party to the suit. Alcohol Warehouse Corp. v. Canfield (C. C. A.) 11 F.(2d) 214 . … But in American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank, supra, the point that the Federal Reserve Board was an indispensable party was not raised, so that we must regard Gnerieh v. Rutter and Webster v.

Association for the Preservation of Freedom of Choice, Inc. v. Wagner

298 F.2d 522 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 6, 1962

Association For The Preservation Of Freedom Of Choice, Inc. v. Wagner

298 F.2d 522 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 6, 1962

Mong, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert F. WAGNER, Daniel S. Weiss, Louis Okin, Earl Brown, and Stanley M. Isaacs, Defendants-Appellees. No. 222. Docket 27136. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Arthur v. Nyquist

712 F.2d 816 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 22, 1983

See, e.g., Oliver v. Kalamazoo Board of Education, supra. . … See, e.g., Oliver v. Kalamazoo Board of Education, 498 F.Supp. 732, 754 (W.D.Mich.1980), rev’d, 706 F.2d 757 (6th Cir.1983); cf. Morgan v.

United States v. Paul v. Oates

560 F.2d 45 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 3, 1977

In Brown v. … Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 571 , 85 S.Ct. 1162 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965); Malat v.

United Electrical Radio & MacHine Workers of America v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

115 F.2d 488 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 4, 1940

And again in Virginian Railway v. … The Board would be faced with a status quo which it could not remedy, but which it would not have countenanced if it could have helped. We are not clear that Oberman & Co. v.

Interport Pilots Agency, Inc. v. Sammis

14 F.3d 133 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 10, 1994

Board of Parole, 543 F.2d 240, 244 (D.C.Cir.1976) (citing Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892 (1944); Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. … Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v.

Otero v. New York City Housing Authority

484 F.2d 1122 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 12, 1973

Crow v. Brown, 332 F.Supp. 382 (N.D. Ga.1971), affd., 457 F.2d 788 (5th Cir. 1972). … See Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947) (provision of bus fares to enable children to get to public and parochial schools across the board); Board of Education v.

Garwin Bobb v. Daniel Senkowski, Superintendent, Fishkill Correctional Facility and Dennis Vacco, New York State Attorney General

196 F.3d 350 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 4, 1999

Relying on Brown v. … Brown v. Andrews, 180 F.3d 403, 407-08 (2d Cir.1999).

Basciano v. Herkimer

605 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 15, 1978

Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division v. Craft, 436 U.S. 1, 9-12 (1978); Board of Regents v. … Justice Powell's formulation in Mathews v.

Johnson v. Glick

481 F.2d 1028 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 29, 1973

The first case in the line is Brown v. Brown, 368 F.2d 992 (9 Cir. 1966), where, however, the complaint alleged other deprivations of civil rights. 2 This was followed by Dodd v. … Although this was a case of beating pure and simple, the court, over Judge Chambers' dissent held it to be “indistinguishable from Brown v. Brown,” supra. To the same effect is Allison v.

Jin Ming Liu v. Alberto R. Gonzales, 1

439 F.3d 109 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 21, 2006

See Strato v. Ashcroft, 388 F.3d 651, 655 (8th Cir.2004); Ahmed v. Ashcroft, 388 F.3d 247, 250-51 (7th Cir.2004); Sswajje v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 528, 533 (6th Cir.2003). … Accordingly, the petition for review is hereby DENIED and the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals is hereby Affirmed.

Fletcher v. Marino

882 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 20, 1989

See Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp., 875 F.2d 1008, 1014 (2d Cir.1989) (citing Gumer v. … See, e.g., Unity Party v.

National Labor Relations Board v. The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, the Cooper Union Federation of College Teachers, Intervenor

783 F.2d 29 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 30, 1986

Beth Israel Hospital v. … Local 259, UAW v. NLRB, 776 F.2d 23, 27 (2d Cir.1985); Ewing v. NLRB, 732 F.2d 1117, 1120-21 (2d Cir.1984).

Oppedisano v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 8, 2014

13‐4351 Oppedisano v.  … RACHEL BROWNING, Trial Attorney (Stuart F. 

Avis Rent a Car System, Inc. v. Garage Employees Union, Local 272

791 F.2d 22 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 20, 1986

See Food Handlers Local 425 v. … See The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 , 72 S.Ct. 1907 , 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972) (litigation forum selection); Snyder v. Smith, 736 F.2d 409, 419 (7th Cir.)

Hawkins v. Steingut

829 F.2d 317 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 18, 1987

Garretto v. … Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp., 613 F.2d 438, 447 (2d Cir.1980) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)).

Arthur v. Manch

12 F.3d 377 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 22, 1993

See Arthur v. Nyquist, 415 F.Supp. 904 (W.D.N.Y.1976). This Court affirmed liability only as to the Board, the Superintendent, and the Council. See Arthur v. … See Arthur v. Nyquist, 514 F.Supp. 1133, 1134-37 (W.D.N.Y.1981).