Case law

Gryl ex rel. Shire Pharmaceuticals Group PLC v. Shire Pharmaceuticals Group PLC

298 F.3d 136 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 5, 2002

Sweet v. Sheahan, 235 F.3d 80, 83 (2d Cir.2000). … See Chevron V.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def.

G4S Int'l Emp't Servs (Jersey) v. Newton-Sealey

975 F.3d 182 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 17, 2020

Fisher v. … As the Board observed, its 2015 decision resolved "the issue of the application of § 33(g) . . . and is the law of the case." S. App'x at 13. The ALJ was bound to follow this finding of the Board. See FCC v.

Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, and Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc., Intervenor

328 F.2d 25 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 27, 1964

SIEGEL CO., Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. … The Board has adopted most of the trial examiner's findings.

United States v. Jorge Buenaventura-Ariza and Delores Quiroz-Santi

615 F.2d 29 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 3, 1980

Id. *33 Three months after its decision in Prouse , the Court spoke again on the subject of investigatory stops in Brown v. Texas, supra. … Brown v. Texas, supra, 443 U.S. at 52 n.2.

Acorn v. United States

618 F.3d 125 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 13, 2010

Sabri v. … See, e.g., Brown, 381 U.S. at 455; Pierce v. Carskadon, 83 U.S. 234 9 (1872); Ex Parte Garland, 71 U.S. 333 (1867); Cummings v. Missouri, 71 U.S. 227 (1867); cf. 10 Selective Serv.

DDK Hotels, LLC v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.

6 F.4th 308 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 23, 2021

Katz v. … Inc. v.

United States ex rel. Shore v. Corsi

61 F.2d 761 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 7, 1932

Shore v. Day (D. C.) 36 F.(2d) 264 . … Findings by the Board supported by some evidence are conclusive. U. S ex rel. Vajtauer v. Commr., *763 273 U. S. 163 , 47 S. Ct. 302 , 71 L. Ed. 560 ; Gegiow v. Uhl, 239 U. S. 3 , 36 S. Ct. 2 , 60 L. Ed. 114 ; U.

Paul Ivan Birzon, in Behalf of Morris Satz v. Edward S. King, United States Marshal and Hon. Michael A. Amico, Sheriff of Erie County

469 F.2d 1241 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 6, 1972

Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385 , 46 S.Ct. 126 , 70 L.Ed. 322 (1926). … United States v. Raines, 362 U.S. 17, 22 , 80 S.Ct. 519 , 4 L.Ed.2d 524 (1960). 5 .

Otero v. New York City Housing Authority

484 F.2d 1122 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 12, 1973

Crow v. Brown, 332 F.Supp. 382 (N.D. Ga.1971), affd., 457 F.2d 788 (5th Cir. 1972). … See Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947) (provision of bus fares to enable children to get to public and parochial schools across the board); Board of Education v.

Breen Air Freight, Ltd., and Mer Cury Air Freight, Inc. v. Air Cargo, Inc.

470 F.2d 767 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 10, 1972

Even if we were to find that the Board could immunize the agreements under its Section 412 authority, we would still conclude, on the basis of Carnation Co. v. … . 5 See Carnation Co. v.

Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23945s Kimberly J. Crocco v. Xerox Corporation and Patricia M. Nazemetz, and American Psychmanagement, Inc.

137 F.3d 105 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 17, 1998

“[T]he normal rule is to decide jurisdiction before the merits,” Browning-Ferris Indus, v. Muszynski, 899 F.2d 151 , 159 (2d Cir.1990), and this court does not depart from this principle lightly. … Browning-Ferris, 899 F.2d at 159.

Skehan v. Village Of Mamaroneck

465 F.3d 96 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 26, 2006

Both Chief Flynn and the members of the Board are entitled to assert a qualified immunity defense, see Harlow v. … Dist. v.

Azmond Ali v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States

448 F.3d 515 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 12, 2006

Id. at 135; see also Cekic v. … See Enriquez-Alvarado v.

United States v. Ruggiero

100 F.3d 284 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 19, 1996

In United States v. … In United States v.

Mastrapasqua v. Shaughnessy, Director

180 F.2d 999 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 2, 1950

See Caha v. United States, 152 U.S. 211 , 14 S.Ct. 513 , 38 L.Ed. 415 ; Boske v. Comingore, 177 U. S. 459 20 S.Ct. 701 , 44 L.Ed. 846 . … Schwab v. Coleman, 4 Cir., 145 F.2d 672 . This same doctrine has often been applied to officials who are not judges. See, e. g., the statement in Wilbur v.

Miner v. City of Glens Falls

999 F.2d 655 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 26, 1993

Board of Education, 806 F.2d 1198 (3rd Cir.1986). In Nekolny v. … In Spence v.

Raichle v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York

34 F.2d 910 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 15, 1929

Such a situation under familiar principles renders the Federal Reserve Board an indispensable party to the suit. Alcohol Warehouse Corp. v. Canfield (C. C. A.) 11 F.(2d) 214 . … But in American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank, supra, the point that the Federal Reserve Board was an indispensable party was not raised, so that we must regard Gnerieh v. Rutter and Webster v.

Lunde v. Oldi

808 F.2d 219 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 26, 1986

808 F.2d 219 Rolf LUNDE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marion B. … Williams v.

Fishoff v. Coty, Inc.

634 F.3d 647 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 4, 2011

10-536 Fishoff v. … Dalton v. Educ.

Garwin Bobb v. Daniel Senkowski, Superintendent, Fishkill Correctional Facility and Dennis Vacco, New York State Attorney General

196 F.3d 350 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 4, 1999

Relying on Brown v. … Brown v. Andrews, 180 F.3d 403, 407-08 (2d Cir.1999).