Case law

United States v. Packer

200 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 31, 1952

In United States v. Nugent, 2 Cir., 200 F.2d 46 , we held such a denial to be reversible error. It is true that in the case at bar the defendant was told that the F.B.I. report was altogether favorable to him. … On the authority of our decision in United States v. Nugent, supra, the judgment is Reversed. 1 . “ § 1625.2 When registrant’s classification may he reopened, and considered anew.

Kaplan v. County of Sullivan

74 F.3d 398 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 18, 1996

Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. New York City Transit Authority, Metropolitan Transportation Authority

990 F.2d 76 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 1993

that all disputes-under the contract be submitted for final decision to the employer’s Board of Directors. … See Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co., Inc. v. New York, 74 N.Y.2d 166 , 544 N.Y.S.2d 580 , 542 N.E.2d 1097 (1989). But see Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v.

Moe v. Dinkins

635 F.2d 1045 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 9, 1980

In Berger v. … See, e. g., England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 384 U.S. 885 , 86 S.Ct. 1924 , 16 L.Ed.2d 998 (1966) (per curiam) (three suits, nine years); Silverman v. Browning, 414 F.Supp. 80 (D.Conn.)

Gustave Zurak v. Paul J. Regan

550 F.2d 86 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 7, 1977

Johnson v. Chairman, New York State Board of Parole, supra, and was noted again in Haymes v. Regan, supra, 525 F.2d at 543-44 , and Holup v. Gates, supra, 544 F.2d at 85-86 . … Johnson v. Chairman, New York State Parole Board, supra, 500 F.2d at 929.

United States Nav. Co. v. Cunard S. S. Co.

50 F.2d 83 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 18, 1931

In Board v. Great Northern Ry., 281 U. S. 412 , 50 S. Ct. 391 , 74 L. … In Board v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 281 U. S. 412 , 50 S. Ct. 391, 393 , 74 L.

Sotelo-Aquije v. Slattery

62 F.3d 54 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 28, 1995

BACKGROUND In Sotelo-Aquije v. … Federal Election Commission v. Political Contributions Data, Inc., 995 F.2d 383, 386 (2d Cir.1993) (citing Pierce v.

Skehan v. Village Of Mamaroneck

465 F.3d 96 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 26, 2006

Both Chief Flynn and the members of the Board are entitled to assert a qualified immunity defense, see Harlow v. … Dist. v.

Miles v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund Employee Pension Benefit Plan

698 F.2d 593 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 20, 1983

See Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 100 S.Ct. 1790, 1794-95 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980). Here, the six-year limitations period prescribed by New York’s C.P.L.R. § 213 controls. See Valle v. … Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc., 680 F.2d 911, 915 (2d Cir.1982). Accord, Haeberle v. Board of Trustees of Buffalo Carpenters, 624 F.2d 1132 , 1136 n. 6 (2d Cir.1980); Riley v.

United States v. William Philip Morico

415 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 31, 1969

While the right to have a court review the action of a board is so restricted, review must be meaningful. Gonzales v. United States, 348 U.S. 407, 415 , 75 S. Ct. 409 , 99 L.Ed. 467 (1955). … See United States v. Seeger, supra. All these requirements have been met here.

Espinoza v. Dimon

807 F.3d 502 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 3, 2015

Fuqi Int’l, Inc. v. … For example, in Levine v.

Marcus Mosby v. Daniel Senkowski

470 F.3d 515 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 30, 2006

United States v. Ceccolini, 435 U.S. 268, 276 , 98 S.Ct. 1054 , 55 L.Ed.2d 268 (1978) (quoting Brown v. … United States v. Singh, 811 F.2d 758, 767 (2d Cir.1987) (Kearse, J. dissenting). In Brown v.

Budd v. United States Parole Commission

48 F. App'x 822 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 22, 2002

United States of America Ex Rel. Albert Sileo v. Walter B. Martin, Warden, Attica Prison, and the People of the State of New York

269 F.2d 586 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 14, 1959

In Brown v. Allen, Mr. … Justice Reed in Brown v.

Long Island Drug Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

111 F.2d 593 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1940

The reasonableness of the .compensation paid was obviously a question of fact and was for the Board to determine. Wagner & Son v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 93 F.2d 816 ; H. Levine & Bros. v. … It was for the Board to draw inferences, to weigh the evidence and to declare the result. Helvering v. National Grocery Co., 304 U.S. 282 , 58 S.Ct 932 , 82 L.Ed. 1346 . Affirmed.

United States v. Jeffrey Hale Purvis

403 F.2d 555 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 14, 1968

Similarly, in Gonzales v. … In DeRemer v.

United States ex rel. Johnson v. Watkins

170 F.2d 1009 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 29, 1948

Judge Dodge writing for the Court of Appeals in Billings v. … Fink v. Tod, supra. In United States ex rel. Frumcair v.

The Li Second Family Limited Partnership v. Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.

231 F.3d 1373 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 8, 2000

See Gardco Mfg., Inc. v. … Dick Co. v.

Mirabilio v. Regional School District 16

761 F.3d 212 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 30, 2014

See Cimochowski v. Hartford Pub. … Ass’n v.

Local 1545, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. Vincent

286 F.2d 127 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 19, 1960

Fitzgerald v. … Leedom v.