Case law

Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co. v. Sherman

230 F. 814 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 15, 1916

Cowley v. Northern Pacific Railroad Co., 159 U. S. 569, 583 [16 Sup. Ct. 127, 40 L. Ed. 263 ]; Mansfield Railway Co. v. Swan, 111 U. S. 379 [4 Sup. Ct. 510, 28 L. Ed. 462 ]; Mexican Nat. Railroad v. Davidson, 157 U. … Dim. 398; Davidsburgh v. Knickerbocker L. Ins. Co., 90 N. Y. 526 .

Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.

454 F.3d 91 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 5, 2006

The district court upheld the Board’s ruling, and Global now appeals. II. DISCUSSION We review de novo the district court’s determination that the Board’s order conforms to federal law. See, e.g., Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. … See TCG N.Y., Inc. v.

Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., Inc. v. H. L. Green Company, Inc., and Third Party Jalen Amusement Company, Inc., and Third Party

316 F.2d 304 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 15, 1963

Brown, 146 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1944), cert. denied, Hearst Magazines v. … De Acosta v. Brown, 146 F.2d at 412 .

United States ex rel. Hayes v. Allstate Insurance Co.

853 F.3d 80 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 4, 2017

See Kellogg Brown & Root, 135 S.Ct. at 1974, 1978 . … Carter v. Halliburton Co., 710 F.3d 171, 181 (4th Cir. 2013), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds sub nom. Kellogg Brown & Root, 135 S.Ct. at 1979 (2015) 1 ; U.S. ex rel. Branch Consultants v. Allstate Ins.

National Labor Relations Board v. Associated Musicians of Greater New York, Local 802, American Federation of Musicians, Afl, and Al Manuti, Its Agent

226 F.2d 900 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 3, 1955

B. v. … The petition for enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.

United States v. John Stafford

389 F.2d 215 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 29, 1968

Although appellant’s claim should have been made to the Local Board, we do not think that a legally untutored registrant should be penalized for his failure to distinguish between the two agencies. See Simmons v. … .”); United States v. Greene, 220 F.2d 792, 794 (7th Cir. 1955). Furthermore, in Billings v.

Mintz v. Howlett

207 F.2d 758 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 27, 1953

In Hirsh v. … United States v. Fry, 2 Cir., 203 F.2d 638, 640 ; United States v. Stiles, 3 Cir., 169 F.2d 455, 459 ; Davis v. United States, 6 Cir., 199 F.2d 689, 691 ; Knox v. United States, 9 Cir., 200 F.2d 398, 401-402 .

Julie A. Bozeman, as Administratrix of the Goods, Chattels and Credits of Johnny R. Bozeman, Deceased v. United States

780 F.2d 198 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 17, 1985

The parties dispute whether Brown was driving the car. It is irrelevant to the issues raised in this appeal whether Brown or Bozeman was driving the car at the time of the accident. 2 . … See Roush v.

United States v. Leslie John Lenhard

437 F.2d 936 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 11, 1970

Compare Paszel v. Laird, 426 F.2d 1169 (2d Cir. 1970) and Capobi-anco v. Laird, 424 F.2d 1304 (2d Cir. 1970) with United States v. Morico, 415 F.2d 138 (2d Cir. 1969) and United States v. … “[I]t is important for courts to know the ground upon which the board acted.” Paszel v. Laird, supra 426 F.2d at 1175 (footnote omitted).

A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. National Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association

250 F.2d 332 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 21, 1957

James V. Hayes, of Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City (A. V. Cherbonnier, of Satterlee, Browne & Cherbonnier, and Theodore S. Hope, Sidney P. Howell, Jr., and Helmut J. F. … Strachman v. Palmer, 1 Cir., 177 F.2d 427 , 12 A.L.R.2d 687 ; Hurn v. Oursler, 289 U.S. 238 , 53 S.Ct. 586 , 77 L.Ed. 1148 ; and Brown v. Haldale Estates, Inc., D.C., 151 F.Supp. 118 ."

Paszel v. Laird

426 F.2d 1169 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 1970

While Gearey I thus decided that the board must consider an appropriate request to reopen, only in United States v. … United States v. Gearey I, 368 F.2d at 149-150 . Moreover, and even more important, it is entirely possible that the local board's action was founded on a belief, mistaken in the light of United States v.

Poor v. Amazon.com Services LLC

104 F.4th 433 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 12, 2024

22-3182 Poor v. … See United States v.

Live Poultry Dealers' Protective Ass'n v. United States

4 F.2d 840 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 2, 1924

The last authoritative exposition of that question is Sonnebom Bros. v. Cureton, 262 U. S. 506 , 43 S. Ct. 643 , 67 L. Ed. 1095 , which, following Woodruff v. Parham, 8 Wall. 123 , 19 L. Ed. 382 , Brown v. … Because the means of information there exchanged was thought to be a covert plan for fixing prices the whole system went by tbe board.

Guan Shan Liao v. United States Department Of Justice

293 F.3d 61 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 20, 2002

Unlike in Anderson v. … See Aguilar-Solis v.

Dangler v. New York City Off Track Betting Corporation

193 F.3d 130 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 23, 1999

Further, the complaint indicated that Dangler's position did not empower him to speak on behalf of the corporation, its president, or its board, see generally Gordon v. … Pembaur, 475 U.S. at 481 ; see also Board of County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 406 (1997); Rookard v. Health & Hospitals Corp., 710 F.2d at 45 .

Roe v. St. John's University

91 F.4th 643 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 31, 2024

21-1125 Roe v. St. … Doe v.

Islam v. Gonzales

214 F. App'x 29 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 17, 2007

Twum v. INS, 411 F.3d 54, 58 (2d Cir.2005). Where, as here, the BIA adopts the decision of the IJ and supplements the IJ’s decision, we review the decision of the IJ as supplemented by the BIA. See Ming Xia Chen v. … Mardones v. McElroy, 197 F.3d 619, 624 (2d Cir.1999) (quoting Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. N.R.D.C., 467 U.S. 837, 844 , 104 S.Ct. 2778 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984)).

Cunney v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF VILLAGE OF GRAND VIEW

660 F.3d 612 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 19, 2011

of Trustees of the Village of Grand View-on-Hudson (the “Board”), the Zoning Board of Appeals for the Village (the “ZBA”), and Joseph W. … United States v.

Paszel v. Laird

426 F.2d 1169 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 1970

While Gearey I thus decided that the board must consider an appropriate request to reopen, only in United States v. … United States v. Gearey I, 368 F. 2d at 149-150 . Moreover, and even more important, it is entirely possible that the local board’s action was founded on a belief, mistaken in the light of United States v.

DPWN Holdings (USA) Incorporated v. United Airlines, Inc.

747 F.3d 145 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 27, 2014

As a result, IATA’s Board of Governors declined to make the resolution effective. … In Ashcroft v.