Case law

United States v. Louis A. Marchisio, John H. Seiter and W. Ward Whipple

344 F.2d 653 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 9, 1965

United States v. Brown, 236 F.2d 403, 405 (2 Cir. 1956). See also, United States v. Woodner, 317 F.2d 649, 651 (2 Cir. 1963); United States v. Robertson, 298 F.2d 739 (2 Cir. 1962); United States v. … Appellants’ argument that the Federal Home Loan Bank Board’s investigation did not concern a matter within the Board’s jurisdiction is entirely without merit.

Julie A. Bozeman, as Administratrix of the Goods, Chattels and Credits of Johnny R. Bozeman, Deceased v. United States

780 F.2d 198 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 17, 1985

The parties dispute whether Brown was driving the car. It is irrelevant to the issues raised in this appeal whether Brown or Bozeman was driving the car at the time of the accident. 2 . … See Roush v.

Bertoldi v. Wachtler

952 F.2d 656 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 30, 1991

See Clark v. *660 Jeter, 486 U.S. 456, 462 , 108 S.Ct. 1910, 1915 , 100 L.Ed.2d 465 (1988); Pickett v. Brown, 462 U.S. 1, 9 , 103 S.Ct. 2199, 2204 , 76 L.Ed.2d 372 (1983). … See Igneri v. Moore, 898 F.2d at 877 ; Eisenbud v. Suffolk County, 841 F.2d at 46 ; Kaplan v. Board of Education, 759 F.2d 256, 261 (2d Cir.1985); Barry v.

National Basketball Association v. Williams

45 F.3d 684 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 24, 1995

It is true that recent antitrust challenges in the professional sports industry have at times involved facts very similar to those in the instant matter, see Powell, 930 F.2d 1293 ; Brown v. … This is particularly the case because the Board and one court of appeals have held that sports leagues are an exception to the principle of voluntariness. See North American Soccer League v.

United States v. Cielo Marin-Buitrago, Tomas William Morales

734 F.2d 889 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 8, 1984

Surveillance of the Forest Hills apartment revealed that the Latin American suspects used a brown Mustang automobile with Florida license plates. … Business Machine and Office Appliance Mechanics Conference Board Local 459, IUE, 300 F.2d 237, 239 (2d Cir.1962) (with question of law, appeals court need only decide if judge below was “wrong”); but see Rogers v.

National Labor Relations Board v. E-Z Supply Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 31, 2010

08-2077-ag National Labor Relations Board v. E-Z Supply Corp., et. al. … - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD , Petitioner, v.

Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co. v. Sherman

230 F. 814 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 15, 1916

Cowley v. Northern Pacific Railroad Co., 159 U. S. 569, 583 [16 Sup. Ct. 127, 40 L. Ed. 263 ]; Mansfield Railway Co. v. Swan, 111 U. S. 379 [4 Sup. Ct. 510, 28 L. Ed. 462 ]; Mexican Nat. Railroad v. Davidson, 157 U. … Dim. 398; Davidsburgh v. Knickerbocker L. Ins. Co., 90 N. Y. 526 .

Diawara v. United States Department of Justice

344 F. App'x 713 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 3, 2009

See Yun-Zui Guan v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 391, 394 (2d Cir.2005). … Xiu Xia Lin v. Mukasey, 534 F.3d 162, 167 (2d Cir.2008).

United States Ex Rel. Levy v. Cain

149 F.2d 338 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 30, 1945

Trainin v. … United States v. Kauten, 2 Cir., 133 F.2d 703 ; United States ex rel. Phillips v. Downer, 2 Cir., 135 F.2d 521 ; United States ex rel. Reel v. Badt, 2 Cir., 141 F.2d 845 ; United States ex rel. Beye v.

United States v. Vincelli

215 F.2d 210 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 9, 1954

United States v. … See also, United States v. Stiles, 3 Cir., 169 F.2d 455 ; U. S. ex rel. Berman v.

Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.

454 F.3d 91 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 5, 2006

The district court upheld the Board’s ruling, and Global now appeals. II. DISCUSSION We review de novo the district court’s determination that the Board’s order conforms to federal law. See, e.g., Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. … See TCG N.Y., Inc. v.

Mintz v. Howlett

207 F.2d 758 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 27, 1953

In Hirsh v. … United States v. Fry, 2 Cir., 203 F.2d 638, 640 ; United States v. Stiles, 3 Cir., 169 F.2d 455, 459 ; Davis v. United States, 6 Cir., 199 F.2d 689, 691 ; Knox v. United States, 9 Cir., 200 F.2d 398, 401-402 .

Gavlak v. Town of Somers

184 F. App'x 32 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 23, 2006

*33 SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs David Gavlak and Hillside Springs Farm, Inc., appeal from an August 2, 2005 judgment of the District Court dismissing all claims against defendants Town of Somers and Somers Zoning Board of Appeals

Bosshold v. Vlieg

114 F. App'x 46 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 3, 2004

First, all of Bosshold’s claims were time-barred, see Eagleston v. Guido, 41 F.3d 865, 871 (2d Cir.1994); Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Sec. Corp., 7 F.3d 1085 , 1087 (2d Cir.1993). … See Colombo v. O’Connell, 310 F.3d 115, 117 (2d Cir.2002). His allegations of harassment and “false allegations” do not constitute cognizable claims under 42 U.S.C § 1983. See Johnson v.

Ke Zhen Zhao v. United States Department Of Justice

265 F.3d 83 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 5, 2001

Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995). Once petitioner's exclusion order was affirmed by the Board, it became final. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(47)(B) (Supp. V 1999). … V 1999).

Westchester Day School v. Village Of Mamaroneck

386 F.3d 183 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 27, 2004

See, e.g., Lyng v. … ."); Jean v.

Larouche v. Kezer

990 F.2d 36 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 31, 1993

Brown, Laurence P. Nadel, and Hope Crescione, Plaintiffs- Appellants- Cross-Appellees, v. Pauline R. KEZER, Secretary of the State of Connecticut, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. … LaRouche v. Kezer, 787 F.Supp. 298, 302 (D.Conn.1992) (quoting Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 737 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1282 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974)). However, this was a misapplication of Storer.

BMG Monroe I, LLC v. Village of Monroe

93 F.4th 595 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 16, 2024

decision to a zoning board of appeals and “submit[] at least one meaningful application for a variance,” Murphy v. … decision to a zoning board of appeals and “submit[] at least one meaningful application for a variance,” Murphy v.

George Morris v. Edward Reynolds, Superintendent of Mohawk Correctional Facility

264 F.3d 38 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 30, 2001

Ohio v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 493, 498 , 104 S.Ct. 2536 , 81 L.Ed.2d 425 (1984) (citing Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977) (quoting North Carolina v. … In Williams v.

Porter v. American Distilling Co.

157 F.2d 1012 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 4, 1946

Brown, Henry C. Cole, Sam Rothberg, Thomas S. Brown, Stewart M. Seymour, and William H. Damour. Edwin M. Slote, of New York City (Max E. Lynne, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Peter E. Siskind. … Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co., 148 U.S. 262 , 13 S.Ct. 590 , 37 L.Ed. 443 . Studer v. Moore, 2 Cir., 153 F.2d 902 ; Hunteman v. New Orleans Public Service, 5 Cir., 119 F.2d 465 ; cf. Reeves v.