Case law

Diawara v. United States Department of Justice

344 F. App'x 713 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 3, 2009

See Yun-Zui Guan v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 391, 394 (2d Cir.2005). … Xiu Xia Lin v. Mukasey, 534 F.3d 162, 167 (2d Cir.2008).

Penney Company v. United States Treasury Department

439 F.2d 63 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 1, 1971

Argosy Ltd. v. Hennigan, 404 F.2d 14, 20 (5 Cir. 1968). The precursor to the Customs Court, the Board of General Appraisers, was established by the Customs Administrative Act of 1890, ch. 407, 12-14, 26 Stat. 137 . … Riccomini v. United States, supra. In Horton v.

George Grivas, Libelants-Appellants v. Alianza Compania Armadora, S.A.

276 F.2d 822 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 12, 1960

For the record is unsatisfactory whether the articles were read to the libelants, few of whom can read and none of whom in fact read the articles before signing, see Brown v. … other matters arose as soon as libelants boarded the vessel at Victoria, B. C., on June 26, 1952.

United States v. Joseph Ellis Faustin

371 F.2d 820 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 12, 1967

Brown v. United States, 333 F.2d 723, 724 (2 Cir. 1964) (per curiam); United States v. On Lee, 201 F.2d 722, 724 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 936 , 73 S.Ct. 798 , 97 L.Ed. 1364 (1953). … The central issue was the nature of the transaction which concededly involved the payment of money and the delivery of something in a brown paper bag. Thus appellant’s motion for a new trial was properly denied.

Douds v. Local 50

224 F.2d 49 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 28, 1955

DOUDS, Regional Director of the Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Appellant, v. … N.L.R.B. v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, 2 Cir., 191 F.2d 65, 68

United States v. David Arthur Gearey

379 F.2d 915 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 3, 1967

V. … United States v. Seeger, supra; Kretchet v. United States, 284 F.2d 561 (9th Cir.1960); Ypparila v. United States, 219 F.2d 465 (10th Cir. 1954); Shepherd v. United States, 217 F.2d 942 (9th Cir.1954); United States v.

Adelson v. Harris

876 F.3d 413 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 29, 2017

13‐4173‐cv  Adelson v.  … Metropoulos,  Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, IL;  Andrew L. Frey, Mayer Brown LLP,  New York, NY; L. 

Morio v. North American Soccer League

632 F.2d 217 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 6, 1980

MORIO, Regional Director of the Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner-Appellee, v. … Unilateral changes in the conditions of employment also have been rescinded by the Board. Fibreboard Paper Prod. Corp. v. N. L. R.

Graziano v. Pataki

689 F.3d 110 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 3, 2012

For example, in McAllister v. … Similarly, in Mathie v.

The Board of Education Central School District No. 2 of the Towns of Bedford v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.

453 F.2d 264 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 15, 1971

The Board of Education, Central School District No. 2, etc., v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., Docket No. 68 Civ. 1162 (S.D.N.Y. May 11, 1970). For New York law, the Court relied on Village of Medina v. … Fabrizio & Martin, Inc. v. The Board of Education Central School District No. 2, etc., Docket No. 66 Civ. 2935 Motion No. 86 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 21, 1967). 4 . Fabrizio & Martin, Inc. v.

United States v. German Severino

800 F.2d 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 28, 1986

United States v. Escobar Noble, 653 F.2d 34, 36-37 (1st Cir.1981); United States v. … See United States v.

Empire State Sugar Company, Inc., American Federation of Grain Millers, Afl-Cio, and Its Local 332, Intervenor v. National Labor Relations Board

401 F.2d 559 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 23, 1968

NLRB v. … This, the Board held, was contrary to the rule of Midwest Piping and Supply Co., 63 NLRB 1060 , recognized by this and other courts (see NLRB v.

United States v. David Arthur Gearey

368 F.2d 144 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 21, 1966

See Keene v. United States, supra, 266 F.2d at 384 . In United States v. … See Keene v. United States, 266 F.2d 378, 384 (1959). But see United States v. Taylor, 351 F.2d 228 (6 Cir. 1965); Boyd v. United States, 269 F.2d 607 (9 Cir. 1959); United States v.

United States v. Bisram Sugrim

732 F.2d 25 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 2, 1984

See United States v. Brown, 499 F.2d 829 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1047 , 95 S.Ct. 619 , 42 L.Ed.2d 640 (1974). … Salter did not assert the invalidity of the initial questioning of all the passengers boarding the bus and we, therefore, expressed no opinion on that point.

National Labor Relations Board v. United Technologies Corporation, and District 91, Lamaw, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Lodge 700, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, and United Technologies Corporation, Intervenor

884 F.2d 1569 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 13, 1989

P 11,518 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Respondent, and District 91, LAMAW, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. … LODGE 700, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and United Technologies Corporation, Intervenor.

Mattina v. Kingsbridge Heights Rehabilitation & Care Center

329 F. App'x 319 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 18, 2009

See Garofolo v. … Further, we are unpersuaded by Kingsbridge’s claims that the Board’s delay in seeking an injunction makes an injunction inappropriate. See Kaynard v.

Overstock Book Company, Inc. v. Barry

436 F.2d 1289 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 23, 1970

The Pending Criminal Charge Against Brown 9 Brown is not a party to this suit. … Plaintiff suggests on Brown's behalf that we should rule that 42 U.S.C. 1983 is an expressly authorized exception to the anti-injunction statute. Compare Cooper v. Hutchinson, 184 F.2d 119 (3d Cir. 1950), and De Vita v.

Novelis Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

885 F.3d 100 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 15, 2018

16-3076(L) Novelis Corporation v. … We review the Board’s application of law to facts de novo, Beverly Enters., Inc. v. NLRB, 139 F.3d 135, 140 (2d Cir. 1998), and the Board’s evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion, NLRB v.

United States v. Whitten

623 F.3d 125 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 19, 2010

07-1320-cr United States v. … Satterwhite v.

Herschel Brown v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.

101 F.3d 683 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 30, 1996

Herschel BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-9229. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. April 30, 1996. … See Brown v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., No. 95 Civ. 5736(DC), slip op. (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 8, 1995).