Case law

Mansouratou v. U.S. Department of Justice

308 F. App'x 548 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 30, 2009

. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); see also Corovic v. … Tu Lin v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Dover Hospitality Services, Inc.

636 F. App'x 826 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 4, 2016

14-3838-ag (L) NLRB v. … Ass’n of Neptune Meter Co. v. NLRB, 158 F.2d 448, 456 (2d Cir. 1946) (citing NLRB v. Pa.

N. C. Freed Company, Inc., and International Roofing Corp. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and Federal Trade Commission

473 F.2d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 1, 1973

See also Johnson v. Southern Pac. Co., 196 U.S. 1, 14-18 , 25 S.Ct. 158 , 49 L.Ed. 363 (1904); FTC v. … See Von Hoffman v.

Finkel v. Romanowicz

577 F.3d 79 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 11, 2009

See Sims v. … Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v.

Hartman Goldsmith & Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

33 F.2d 89 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 20, 1929

The plaintiff relies on Sigua Iron Co. v. Greene (C. C. A.) 88 F. 207 , United States v. Two Baskets (C. C. A.) 205 F. 37 , Reis v. Rosenfeld (C. C. A.) 204 F. 282 , and Fire Association of Philadelphia v. … Whitcomb v. Shultz (C. C. A.) 223 F. 268 -276.

Indian Head, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation, Cross-Appellant

817 F.2d 938 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 22, 1987

Cf., e.g., Kletschka v. … See Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943) (state action doctrine). The district court instructed the jury accordingly.

Earl G. Smith, Administrator of the Estate of Gary Dean Smith, Deceased v. Metropolitan Property and Liability Insurance Company

629 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 10, 1980

Case & McGrath, Inc., 585 F.2d 557 (2d Cir. 1978); Brown v. First Nat. City Bank, 503 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1974); Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon v. … See McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 673 n. 5, 83 S.Ct. 1433, 1436 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Louisiana Power & Light Co. v.

Claude L. HUNTLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMUNITY SCHOOL BOARD OF BROOKLYN, NEW YORK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

543 F.2d 979 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 12, 1976

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-78 (1972). … of Regents v.

Mansouratou v. U.S. Department of Justice

308 F. App'x 548 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 30, 2009

. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); see also Corovic v. … Tu Lin v.

The Mercer

297 F. 981 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 25, 1924

Ferguson v. Providence Washington Insurance Co. (D. C.) 125 Fed. 141 . In McConnochie v. Kerr (D. … This barge had on board 1,273 tons of coal, which at $4 a ton had a value of approximately $5,000. But as the cargo on this barge was not sued, and its value was not stipulated or proven, it must be disregarded.

National Labor Relations Board v. Eli Gordon, Gerald Tillinger and Seymour Tillinger, a Copartnership D/B/A Balsam Village Management Company

792 F.2d 29 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 30, 1986

Under NLRB v. … We consider it sufficient, however, if the AU has provided such findings and analysis and the Board has indicated its adoption of them. See NLRB v. Windsor Industries, Inc., 730 F.2d at 866 ; NLRB v.

J. C. Penney Co. v. United States Treasury Department

439 F.2d 63 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 1, 1971

Argosy Ltd. v. Hennigan, 404 F.2d 14, 20 (5 Cir. 1968). The precursor to the Customs Court, the Board of General Appraisers, was established by the Customs Administrative Act of 1890, ch. 407, §§ 12-14, 26 Stat. 137 . … Riccomini v. United States, supra. In Horton v.

Danielson v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 501

509 F.2d 1371 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 31, 1975

A decision in the unfair labor practice proceeding, now pending before the Board for over five months, would render an opinion by us advisory. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. … This does not mean that the placement of the burden of showing the likelihood of repetition would be the same were we asked to enforce a Board order. See NLRB v.

United States v. Angel Rosario

543 F.2d 6 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 14, 1976

One of the males was described in the police report as negro-hispanic, 5'11" tall, 165 lbs, and wearing a brown shirt, brown jacket, brown trousers, and dark shoes. … Hill v.

Augustus I. Cavallari, Jr. v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

57 F.3d 137 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 11, 1995

Citing First National Bank of Eden v. … V. Cavallari seeks to set aside the prohibition order as unwarranted by the Board’s findings.

David Dickerson v. Walter Fogg

692 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 25, 1982

In Chavis v. … The record reveals that even though Dickerson’s cousin was named “Ronald Brown,” he was indicted and tried under the name “Jeffrey Brown.” . References to “H” are to the combined Wade-Huntley hearing transcript.

Frankel v. Cole

313 F. App'x 418 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 4, 2009

See Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549, 554, 557 , 120 S.Ct. 1075 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1047 (2000). … Love v. Nat’l Med. Enters., 230 F.3d 765, 777 (5th Cir.2000).

King v. New York State Division of Parole

260 F. App'x 375 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 16, 2008

Eze v. Senkowski, 321 F.3d 110, 120 *377 (2d Cir.2003). … Similarly, in Young v.

United States v. Robert Driscoll

496 F.2d 252 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1974

.; United States v. Brown, 470 F.2d 285, 288 (2d Cir. 1972); Lehrich, The Use and Disclosure of Presentence Reports in the United States, 47 F.R.D. 225 (1969). … See McGee v. United States, 462 F.2d 243 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Brown, 479 F. 2d 1170, 1172 (2d Cir. 1973).

Clarke v. Communications Workers

187 F. App'x 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 16, 2006

judgment, concluding that plaintiffs had failed to establish that the Union’s actions had been “arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith,” as is required to demonstrate a breach of the duty of fair representation, see Mack v. … Barr v. United Parcel Serv., 868 F.2d 36 , 43 (2d Cir.1989) (internal quotation marks omitted).