Case law

Chestnut v. People of State of New York

370 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 2, 1966

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 471 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953) The Supreme Court's recent decision in Louisiana v. … But see Brown v. Allen, supra; Fay v. People of State of New York, supra. The Supreme Court may soon shed more light on the law in the area of alleged discrimination in the selection of jurors.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 584, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

535 F.2d 205 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 12, 1976

v. … See e.g., NLRB v. Local 25, IBEW, 396 F.2d 591, 593 (2d Cir. 1968); NLRB v.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,310 Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. Dasa Corporation and Arthur Andersen & Co.

524 F.2d 811 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 3, 1975

In support of its position, the Browning Committee cites the first Supreme Court decision to recognize a private cause of action for damages sustained from a violation of § 14(a), J. I. Case Co. v. … Five years later, in Mills v.

The Pile Driver No. 2.

239 F. 489 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 12, 1916

S. v. Emperor (D. … It seems to me very clear that neither the captain nor any person on board of the tug, was the ‘person offending.’ ” In the present case the entire enterprise was under the direction of those in charge of the pile driver.

Stephanie CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. General Robert E. CUSHMAN, Jr., Commandant, United States Marine Corps, Appellee

531 F.2d 1114 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 23, 1976

Waterford Board of Education, supra, and of Mr. Justice Powell concurring in Cleveland Board of Education v. … Burnett v. Tolson, 474 F.2d 877 , 883 & n. 10 (4th Cir. 1973); see Brown v. Schlesinger, 365 F.Supp. 1204, 1206-07 (E.D.Va.1973).

United States of America, South End Education Committee, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees v. Board of Education of Waterbury, Connecticut

560 F.2d 1103 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 31, 1977

Nor have the appellants in any way made out a case for modification under the standards of Pasadena City Board of Education v. … Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 744 , 94 S.Ct. 3112 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1974).

Turpin v. Mailet

579 F.2d 152 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 5, 1978

It has, however, not had since Brown v. Board of Education, supra, or for that matter Harper v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955).

National Labor Relations Board v. General Electric Company, and International Union of Electrical, Radio, and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

418 F.2d 736 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 28, 1969

In NLRB v. … The Board may rely on communications to establish discriminatory treatment in violation of sections 8(a) (3) and 8(a) (1). See NLRB v. Lipman Bros., Inc., 355 F.2d 15 (1st Cir. 1966); Hendrix Mfg. Co. v.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Culpepper

270 F.2d 241 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 10, 1959

From this judgment the individual appellants and their wholly owned corporations, George Phillip Barton, and Brown, Barton & Engel (Barton), Albert J. Grayson and A. J. Grayson & Co., Inc. (Grayson), and Garland L. … Indeed, in Hecht Co. v.

Theodore Fleischmann v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Seahorse Coastal Assistance & Towing and State Insurance Fund

137 F.3d 131 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 23, 1998

(MB) 36 , 39 (Feb. 24, 1978) (holding that a pile driver involved in the construction and repair of piers was a harbor worker); Stewart v. Brown & Root, Inc., 7 Ben. Rev. Bd. Serv. … (MB) 356 , 366 (Jan. 12, 1978) (holding that a painter-sandblaster working on the construction site of a dry dock was a harbor worker), aff’d sub nom, Brown & Root v. Joyner, 607 F.2d 1087 , 1090 n. 5 (4th Cir.1979).

Standard & Poor's Corporation, Inc. v. Commodity Exchange, Inc.

683 F.2d 704 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 29, 1982

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Engman, 527 F.2d 1115, 1121 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 2237 , 48 L.Ed.2d 837 (1976); see Stamicarbon, N. V. v. … Moreover, the Chicago Board of Trade, over the objection of Dow Jones, Inc., plans to offer a futures contract based on the Dow Jones Averages. See Chicago Board of Trade v. Dow Jones, Inc., No. 82 L 4067 (Cir.Ct.

7 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1207, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9288 Boston M. Chance v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, the Board of Examiners, Charles Wiener (Pro Se), Proposed Defendant-Intervenor

496 F.2d 820 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 12, 1974

CHANCE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. … V, 6, and relief upon heavily by the Board of Education.

Cynthia Grantham Wright v. Peter J. Cayan, Individually and as President of the State University of New York College of Technology

817 F.2d 999 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 4, 1987

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); see Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1491 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). … Id. at 467 , 443 N.E.2d at 446 , 457 N.Y.S.2d at 198 (quoting Brown Brothers Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Beam Construction Corp., 41 N.Y.2d at 400-01 , 361 N.E.2d at 1001 , 393 N.Y.S.2d at 352). III.

Ambrosius v. Ambrosius

239 F. 473 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 9, 1917

Govin v. De Miranda, 79 Hun, 329 , 29 N. Y. Supp. 347 . … E. 1167 , the deed of trust and the securities themselves had been de *477 livered by the decedent to the trustee. , In Linton v. Brown (C.

United States v. Kahbir Ahmad, A/K/A Terry Brisbane

202 F.3d 588 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 26, 2000

See, e.g., United States v. Armstead, 114 F.3d 504, 513 (5th Cir.1997) (“another felony offense,” § 2K2.1(b)(5)); United States v. Anderson, 5 F.3d 795, 801 (5th Cir.1993) (“another offense,” § 2A4.1); United States v. … See United States v.

Overstock Book Co. v. Barry

436 F.2d 1289 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 23, 1970

The Pending Criminal Charge Against Brown Brown is not a party to this suit. … Plaintiff suggests on Brown’s behalf that we should rule that 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is an expressly authorized exception to the anti-injunction statute. Compare Cooper v.

New York District Council No. 9, International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades v. National Labor Relations Board

453 F.2d 783 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 27, 1971

The dissenting board member and the petitioner place heavy reliance upon Scofield v. NLRB 14 in support of their position. We believe that this reliance is misplaced. … See NLRB v. Strong, 393 U.S. 357, 360-361 , 89 S.Ct. 541 , 21 L.Ed.2d 546 (1969); NLRB v.

Halecki v. United New York & New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilots Ass'n

251 F.2d 708 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 10, 1958

In Guerrini v. … Co., 3 Cir., 1939, 101 F.2d 902 ; Graham v. A. Lusi, Ltd., 5 Cir., 1953, 206 F.2d 223 ; The A. W. Thompson, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1889, 39 F. 115 , per Addison Brown, J.; The James McGee, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1924, 300 F. 93 . . Cf.

United States v. Ferguson

758 F.2d 843 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 28, 1985

A witness who testifies does not have the “ ‘right to set forth ... all the facts which tend in ... favor [of one party] without laying himself open to a cross-examination upon those facts,’ ” Brown v. … Appellants rely on State v.

United States v. Larry Corbett

750 F.3d 245 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 29, 2014

11-3678-cr United States v. … He argues that Detective Brown’s assurance that he would “treat [Corbett] like a Brother Mason” was a promise of leniency that coerced Corbett into speaking. In United States v.