Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.93s
218 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 7, 1954
See Dickinson v. … No attempt was made in Michigan to reserve rights against the absent Brown; on the contrary, the compromise explicitly purports to release Brown.
Cited 35 timesPublished77 F.3d 1424 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 8, 1996
77 F.3d 1424 Donald SCHANBARGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert MACY, Jr., Defendant, Hudson Falls; Paul J. Brown; Andrew S. Conley; Marjorie Clark; Clarisse Mondoux, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1026, Docket 95-7810. … Brown, and Andrew S. Conley. Jeff Culkin, Bouck, Holloway, Kiernan & Casey, Albany, New York, for Appellee Marjorie Clark. Mark E.
Cited 0 timesPublished853 F.2d 59 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 26, 1988
to rehire Brown. … again by not complying with the mandate of the Cashen award that *65 it reinstate Brown and give him back pay; and (2) because the employer had acted in bad faith within the meaning of Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v.
Cited 51 timesPublishedBrowning-Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc. v. Muszynski
899 F.2d 151 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 26, 1990
Brown, 187 U.S. 308, 311 , 23 S.Ct. 123, 124 , 47 L.Ed. 190 (1902). In The Fair v. … In Franchise Tax Board of California v.
Cited 13 timesPublished233 F.2d 539 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 9, 1956
B. v. … B. v. Furriers Joint Council, supra, has no bearing on the case before us now.
Cited 15 timesPublishedMarvin Dowen Reid v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States
478 F.3d 510 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 28, 2007
See Brown v. … See Tablie v.
Cited 6 timesPublished677 F.2d 13 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 1982
the procedure provided by N.Y.Civ.Serv.Law § 210 amounted to a garnishment without hearing or court order in violation of Sniadach v. … Kornit v. Board of Education, 542 F.2d 593 (2d Cir. 1976) (per curiam). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and remanded for further consideration in light of Monell v.
Cited 2 timesPublished954 F.3d 492 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 31, 2020
Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 814 F.3d 619, 624 (2d Cir. 2016); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(k)(1). … See Brown, 814 F.3d at 624-26.
Cited 149 timesPublishedLyndonville Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Lussier
211 F.3d 697 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 3, 2000
In essence, Lussier and his cronies dominated the board, which also served as the bank’s loan committee. … As we said in United States v. Brown, 744 F.2d 905 (2d Cir.1984), “[t]he fact that a restitution order is enforceable in the same manner as a civil judgment ... does not transform the former into the latter.”
Cited 29 timesPublishedConnelly v. Hancock, Dorr, Ryan & Shove
195 F.2d 864 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 10, 1952
Hotel Syracuse Men’s Shop v. … Brown was then 49, his brother 51. We reversed the adjudication then made for errors in the proceedings, raising some question whether the three petitioners were bona fide creditors. Syracuse Engineering Co. v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedUnited States v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development
239 F.3d 211 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 5, 2001
In Adarand , they were imposed by the United States Congress (at 15 U.S.C. § 644 (g)(1)), see Adarand, 515 U.S. at 206 , 115 S.Ct. 2097 , 132 L.Ed.2d 158 ; in Wygant , by a local school board, see Wygant, 476 U.S. at 269- … See also United States v. Western Elec.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPatterson v. County of Oneida, New York
375 F.3d 206 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 15, 2004
Brown in Brown-v-Middaugh, dated June 10, 1998 ("Brown Aff."), ¶¶ 2-4). … That would be fair to say, yes. 90 ( Brown-v-Middaugh Hearing Transcript, July 23, 1998, at 210 (emphases added).)
Cited 37 timesPublished496 F.2d 1138 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 10, 1974
In Hooper v. … Lanza v. Drexel, 479 F.2d 1277, 1301-1302 (2d Cir. 1973) (en banc) and cases cited therein, Mariash’s claim of deliberate market manipulation alleges far more than mere negligence by Peabody, Brown.
Cited 169 timesPublishedRipple Analytics Inc. v. People Center, Inc., D/B/A Rippling
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 26, 2025
Once the trademark was registered, “Ripple’s shareholders and board of directors decided that 100% of the company should be acquired by Mr. Pusey.” Appellant’s Br. at 10. … See Cangemi v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGreene v. Town of Blooming Grove
879 F.2d 1061 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 17, 1989
In the Matter of Application of Marvin Greene v. The Planning Board of Blooming Grove, No. 1173/74 (N.Y.Sup.Ct. July 17, 1974) (unreported). … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 *1065 (1972); see also RRI Realty Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Southampton, 870 F.2d 911, 915-18 (2d Cir.1989).
Cited 17 timesPublished502 F.2d 631 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 22, 1974
See Reid v. Board of Educ., 453 F.2d 238 (2d Cir. 1971); Coleman v. Ginsberg, 428 F.2d 767 (2d Cir. 1970). … See James v. Board of Educ., 461 F.2d 566 (2d Cir. 1972).
Overruled on other grounds by Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 (1984)Cited 164 timesPublishedDervishi Ex Rel. T.D. v. Stamford Board of Education
653 F. App'x 55 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 27, 2016
of 14 Education (“Board”). … A.M. v. 28 Cornwall Cent. Sch.
Cited 5 timesUnpublishedCertain-Teed Products Corporation v. Topping
171 F.2d 241 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 8, 1948
Brendle v. Smith, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 7 F.R.D. 119 . … Plaintiff, to support such a denial, relies upon Young v.
Cited 15 timesPublished619 F.2d 180 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 26, 1980
See NLRB v. Serv-All Co. Inc., 491 F.2d 1273, 1275 (10th Cir. 1974); NLRB v. McCready and Sons, Inc., 482 F.2d 872, 874-876 (6th Cir. 1973); NLRB v. … See NLRB v. McCready and Sons, Inc., supra at 875 n.3.
Cited 8 timesPublishedUnited States v. George Nathan
476 F.2d 456 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 16, 1973
The relevance of the card is that it served as circumstantial evidence of Brown’s involvement with Torrado and the conspiracy. Used for this purpose, introduction of the card was proper. See United States v. … However, at trial Brown did not specify the grounds now asserted to exclude evidence of the 1945 arrest. See United States v.
Cited 60 timesPublished
Ask Donna