Case law

Willheim v. Murchison

342 F.2d 33 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 10, 1965

These provisions must be read along with § 10, designed to provide some independence in the board of directors, and with what we have said as to the nature of the duty of all directors in passing on annual renewals, Brown … v.

Raderman v. Kaine

411 F.2d 1102 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 5, 1969

The district court relied upon this court’s recent decision in Smith v. … Fox v. Brown, 402 F.2d 837 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1114 , 89 S.Ct. 1007 , 22 L.Ed.2d 120 (March 24, 1969); Winters v.

National Labor Relations Board, and Rochester Telephone Corporation, Intervenor v. Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 1170

474 F.2d 778 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 21, 1972

Upon these facts, we find the principle enunciated by the Supreme Court in Scofield v. NLRB, 394 U.S. 423, 432-33 (1969), to be applicable here. … See Booster Lodge No. 405 v. NLRB, 459 F.2d 1143 , 1150-55 (D.C.Cir.1972), aff’d,-U.S. —-“(May 21,1973) (per curiam).

Greene v. Cheetham

293 F.2d 933 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 31, 1961

See Industrial Waxes v. Brown, 2 Cir., 1958, 258 F.2d 800, 802 , certiorari denied, 1959, 358 U.S. 931 , 79 S.Ct. 319 , 3 L.Ed.2d 304 . … See Hamdi & Ibrahim Mango Co., Ltd. v. Reliance Insurance Co., 2 Cir., 1961, 291 F.2d 437 ; Industrial Waxes v.

Irish v. Central Vermont Ry., Inc.

164 F.2d 837 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 9, 1947

Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 2 Cir., 153 F.2d 757 , 164 A.L.R. 387 ; accord, Thompson v. Camp, 6 Cir., 163 F.2d 396, 400 . Cf. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co., 317 U.S. 239 , 63 S.Ct. 246 , 87 L.Ed. 239 . … Duncan v. Thompson, supra. Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. 1 See Girard v. Jerry, 95 Vt. 129 , 113 A. 533 ; Brown v. Fine, 104 Vt. 221 , 158 A. 669 ; and Woods v.

Helene Curtis Industries, Inc., and Helene Curtis Sales, Inc., C. v. Layden, Doing Business as Southwestern Beauty Products Company, Plaintiff-Intervener v. Sales Affiliates, Inc., the Gillette Company, Skillern & Sons, Inc., and Walgreen Drug Company of Texas, Plaintiffs-Interveners-Appellees v. Sales Affiliates, Inc., Sales Affiliates, Inc., the Procter & Gamble Company, Involuntary v. C. v. Layden, Doing Business as Southwestern Beauty Products Company, Sales Affiliates, Inc., the Procter & Gamble Company, Involuntary v. Skillern & Sons, Inc., Walgreen Drug Company of Texas, and the Gillette Company, Defendnats-Appellees

233 F.2d 148 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 9, 1956

In Kwik Set, Inc., v. … Sirocco Engineering Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co., 2 Cir., 220 F. 137 . Cf. Trico Products Corp. v.

United States v. Moten

564 F.2d 620 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 28, 1977

United States v. … The motivation and credibility of Brown were best left to the jury to probe. United States v. Bright, 517 F.2d 584, 586 (2d Cir. 1975).

United States v. City of Yonkers

181 F.3d 301 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 22, 1999

The first of these two duties reflects the federal judiciary’s ongoing commitment first articulated in Brown v. … R.Civ.P. 52(a); Jenkins v. Missouri, 122 F.3d 588 , 596 (8th Cir.1997); Lockett v. Board of Educ. of Muscogee County, 111 F.3d 839, 841-42 (11th Cir.1997) (per curiam); Coalition to Save Our Children v.

Ivan C. Mcleod v. Local 282, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America

345 F.2d 142 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 5, 1965

Brown, Jr., and Marvin Roth, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Cohen & Weiss, New York City (Bruce H. Simon, Robert S. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Plumbers Union, 299 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1962).

United States v. Twentieth Century Bus Operators, Inc.

101 F.2d 700 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 6, 1939

McElroy v. United States, 164 U.S. 76 , 17 S.Ct. 31 , 41 L.Ed. 355 ; Coco v. United States, 8 Cir., 289 F. 33 . … But a misjoinder caused by a variance of .proof will not result in a reversal unless prejudicial to the defendants (Stokes v.

Hack v. President & Fellows of Yale College

237 F.3d 81 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 28, 2000

And there, American Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Board of Regents for Regency Universities, 607 F.Supp. 845 (N.D.Ill.1984), parietal rules similar to those here were not even questioned. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962); see also Town Sound and Custom Tops, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Eugene Iovine, Inc.

371 F. App'x 167 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 30, 2010

09-0217-ag NLRB v. … Because the Board adopted the ALJ’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in part, we review both the ALJ’s opinion and the Board’s. See NLRB v.

Mahadeo v. New York City Campaign Finance Board

514 F. App'x 53 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 18, 2013

12-772-cv Mahadeo v. … 12-772-cv 18 19 New York City Campaign Finance Board, Amy 20 M.

JOHN McGRATH CORPORATION v. HUGHES

264 F.2d 314 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 2, 1959

Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1951, 340 U.S. 474, 477 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 ; Ellers v. Railroad Retirement Board, 2 Cir., 1943, 132 F.2d 636 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … Associated General Contractors v. Cardillo, supra; cf. Ellers v. Railroad Retirement Board, 2 Cir., 1943, 132 F.2d 636 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Service Wood Heel Co., 1 Cir., 1941, 124 F.2d 470 . 8 Affirmed.

National Labor Relations Board v. Benne Katz, Alfred Finkel and Murray Katz, D/B/A Williamsburg Steel Rpoducts Company

289 F.2d 700 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 11, 1961

Here, the Board explicitly declined to do so. Justice Frankfurter, concurring in N.L.R.B. v. … Considering the totality of events the court enforced a Board order based upon a Board finding that the employer had failed to bargain in good faith N.L.R.B. v. Century Cement Mfg.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sidney Seltzer and Ralph Seltzer D/B/A G. & S. Electric Company

296 F.2d 125 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 30, 1961

When asked by the court how an order of enforcement would be harmful if the respondent had already complied with the Board’s order, he replied that it would not be harmful. In N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc., 339 U.S. 563, 567 , 70 S.Ct. 826, 833 , 94 L.Ed. 1067 . Accordingly, the petition for enforcement is granted.

National Labor Relations Board v. General Electric Company, General Electric Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio,petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

358 F.2d 292 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 17, 1966

358 F.2d 292 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Respondent. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS, AFL-CIO,Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Docket 29502, 29576, 29577. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

The Resource Group International Limited v. Chishti

91 F.4th 107 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 22, 2024

Brown 3 Bros. Elec. Contractors, Inc. v. Beam Constr. … Lusk v.

William D. Pettit and Thomas J. Crawford, Trustees-Appellants v. Doeskin Products, Inc. And Keta Gas & Oil Company

270 F.2d 95 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 13, 1959

Brown and William Erb were never notified. Judge Palmieri’s finding that no December 31 meeting ever took place is clearly right. … Under the law of New York mere “domination” of a board of directors is not the equivalent of the assent of the board in cases where such assent is a legal condition of the transaction. See Manson v.

State of Connecticut Office of Protection and Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities v. Hartford Board of Education

464 F.3d 229 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 15, 2006

See Tory v. … See Williams v.