Case law

The Long Island Rail Road Company v. National Mediation Board, Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks

703 F.2d 680 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 25, 1983

British Airways Board v. National Mediation Board, 685 F.2d 52, 55 (2d Cir.1982). But LIRR notes that a failure to investigate a representation dispute may constitute a gross statutory violation. See id. at 56 . … The “methods and procedures” employed in an investigation are within the discretion of the Board, Brotherhood of *682 Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v.

The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. National Labor Relations Board, and Insurance Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

412 F.2d 77 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 2, 1969

B. v. Acme Industrial Co., 385 U.S. 432 , 87 S.Ct. 565 , 17 L.Ed.2d 495 (1967); N. L. R. B. v. Truitt Mfg. Co., 351 U.S. 149 , 76 S.Ct. 753 , 100 L.Ed. 1027 (1956); Fafnir Bearing Co. v. N. L. R. … B. v. Acme Industrial Co., supra; Fafnir Bearing Co. v. N. L. R. B., supra.

National Labor Relations Board v. A & S Electronic Die Corp. And a & S Steel Rule Die Corp.

423 F.2d 218 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 11, 1970

See NLRB v. Firedoor Corp. of America, 291 F.2d 328, 331 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 921 , 82 S.Ct. 242 , 7 L.Ed.2d 136 (1961); Bourne v. NLRB, 332 F.2d 47 (2 Cir. 1964); NLRB v. … This was sufficient to support the Board’s conclusion that the company was in violation of § 8(a) (1) and (2). NLRB v. Midtown Service Co., Inc., 425 F.2d 665 (2 Cir. Feb. 25, 1970).

Greenwich Citizens Committee, Inc. v. Counties Of Warren And Washington Industrial Development Agency

77 F.3d 26 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 16, 1996

Healthy City School District Board of Education v. … See, e.g., Bell v. School Board, 734 F.2d 155 (4th Cir.1984).

Actiesselskabet Ingrid v. Central R.

216 F. 72 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 2, 1914

In Brown v. Collins, 53 N. H. 442, 16 Am. Rep. 372 (1873), the New Hampshire court considered at length Rylands v. … Indeed, in Rylands v.

Silverman v. J.R.L. Food Corp.

196 F.3d 334 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 16, 1999

Silverman v. Major League Baseball Player Relations Committee, Inc., 67 F.3d 1054, 1059 (2d Cir.1995); see, e.g., Kaynard v. MMIC, Inc., 734 F.2d 950, 953 (2d Cir.1984); Kaynard v. … See generally McKennon v.

Halebian v. Berv

590 F.3d 195 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 29, 2009

Harhen v. Brown, 431 Mass. 838, 844 , 730 N.E.2d 859, 865 (2000); accord RCM Secs. … Maldonado v.

Rutkin v. Reinfeld

229 F.2d 248 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 25, 1956

to as Browne-Vintners Old). … O’Connor v. O’ Connor, supra; Romano v. Bono, Sup. Ct.Kings Co., 1938, 168 Misc. 897 , 6 N.Y. S.2d 204; Rosenblum v. Frankel, supra; and Parise v. Pepe, supra, are to the same effect.

National Maritime Union of America v. Commerce Tankers Corp.

457 F.2d 1127 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 22, 1972

We have interpreted that requirement to mean that there must be a “reasonable possibility” that the unfair labor practice charge will be sustained by the Board. McLeod for and on Behalf of N. L. R. B. v. … Drivers Union v. Jenkins, 308 F.2d 516 , 517 n. 1 (9 Cir. 1962); Brown for and on Behalf of N. L. R. B. v.

J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Textile Workers Union of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, and J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc., Intervenor

380 F.2d 292 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 7, 1967

STEVENS & CO., Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. TEXTILE WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and J. P. … Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Pease Oil Company and Its Officer and Managing Agent, James O. Porter

311 F.2d 87 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 20, 1962

The Board’s petition for enforcement of its original order in this cause was granted by this court on May 26, 1960, 279 F.2d 135 . … His request that the inspection be continued until the end of May was denied by the Board.

State Of Connecticut Office Of Protection And Advocacy For Persons With Disabilities v. Hartford Board Of Education

464 F.3d 229 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 15, 2006

Kelly Balser, Senior Staff Attorney, Connecticut Association of Boards of Education, Wethersfield, Connecticut, for Amicus Curiae Connecticut Association of Boards of Education. … Co. v.

Walden v. Kosinski

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 21, 2025

25-764-cv Walden v. … McIntyre, 514 U.S. at 344 (listing “ballot access” provisions as the type of electoral laws that may be subject to the Anderson-Burdick test (citing Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 (1974))).

Saverio D. Ruffolo v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. Anthony G. Caserta the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.

949 F.2d 33 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 5, 1991

(“Oppenheimer”) pursuant to which Oppenheimer agreed to serve as an options broker for Ruffolo with respect to trading on the (dismissed defendant) Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. … Chemical Bank v. Slaner (In re Duplan Corp.), 591 F.2d 139, 148 (2d Cir.1978) (citing Coleman v. American Export Isbrandsten Lines, Inc., 405 F.2d 250 , 251 n. 1 (2d Cir.1968); Wolfson v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Management Food Systems Division of Stouffer Foods Corporation

486 F.2d 1395 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 17, 1971

(BNA) 3091 National Labor Relations Board v. Management Food Systems Division of Stouffer Foods Corporation 71-1802 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit 12/17/71 1 N.L.R.B. ENFORCEMENT GRANTED

Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security

622 F. App'x 59 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 3, 2016

Brown’s diagnosis of Lopez as “totally]” disabled, because Dr. Brown’s underlying medical findings were “unchanged” from recent examinations in which Dr. Brown had deemed Lopez not disabled. 1 AR18, 333. … Brown’s opinion on these grounds, the ALJ should have afforded Lopez “an opportunity to obtain a more detailed statement” from Dr. Brown. Echevarria, 685 F.2d at 756 (quoting Hankerson v.

The Hellig Olav

282 F. 534 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 7, 1922

See Lloyd v. Wyckoff, 11 N. J. Law, 218. And “constructive possession” is that which exists in contemplation of the law, without actual enjoyment or occupation. Brown v. Volkening, 64 N. Y. 76, 80 ; Jeffrey v. … In Cheriot v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Sidney Seltzer and Ralph Seltzer D/B/A G. & S. Electric Company

296 F.2d 125 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 30, 1961

When asked by the court how an order of enforcement would be harmful if the respondent had already complied with the Board’s order, he replied that it would not be harmful. In N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc., 339 U.S. 563, 567 , 70 S.Ct. 826, 833 , 94 L.Ed. 1067 . Accordingly, the petition for enforcement is granted.

P.J. v. CT Board of Ed.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 23, 2013

10‐3586‐cv P.J., et al. v. CT Board of Ed., et al.  … Mark Katz, et al.,  20 21 Intervenors‐Plaintiffs‐ 22 Appellants, 23  1 v. 2 3 CT  BOARD  OF  ED.,  EDUCATION,  DEPT  OF, 4 TIROZZI

International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 18, 2016

Kelly‐Brown v. Winfrey, 717 F.3d 295, 307 (2d Cir. 2013)  18 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Starbucks Corp., 588 F.3d at 115). As  19 we stated in Arrow Fastener Co. v.  … Kelly‐Brown, 717 F.3d at 308.