Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
8.03s
867 F.2d 767 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 8, 1989
In NLRB v. … See NLRB v.
Cited 10 timesPublished338 F. App'x 94 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 27, 2009
Mason v. Barbieri, 07 Civ. 287 (D.Conn. May 6, 2008) (Docket No. 83). As plaintiffs’ concede, this was the proper standard, see Appellants’ Reply Br. at 6 n. 3; see also Shrader v. … Ayeni v. Mottola, 35 F.3d 680, 687 (2d Cir.1994) (emphasis in original), abrogated on other grounds by Wilson v.
Cited 0 timesPublished338 F. App'x 94 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 27, 2009
Mason v. Barbieri, 07 Civ. 287 (D.Conn. May 6, 2008) (Docket No. 83). As plaintiffs’ concede, this was the proper standard, see Appellants’ Reply Br. at 6 n. 3; see also Shrader v. … Ayeni v. Mottola, 35 F.3d 680, 687 (2d Cir.1994) (emphasis in original), abrogated on other grounds by Wilson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWholean v. CSEA SEIU Local 2001
955 F.3d 332 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 15, 2020
19-1563-cv Wholean v. … Harper v. Va.
Cited 22 timesPublished477 F.2d 260 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 13, 1973
Surely the Board could have found the same here. Similarly, in Truck Drivers and Helpers Local Union #728 v. … As the Supreme Court has noted in another context, a "proceeding by the Board is not to adjudicate private rights but to effectuate a public policy." NLRB v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Associated Musicians of Greater New York, Local 802, Afm, Afl-Cio
422 F.2d 850 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 2, 1970
B. v. … . § 160 (c) (Board may order “such affirmative action * * * as will effectuate the policies of [the Act]”); May Department Stores Co. v. N. L. R. B., 326 U.S. 376, 390-393 , 66 S.Ct. 203 , 90 L.Ed. 145 (1945).
Cited 5 timesPublished618 F.2d 955 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 3, 1980
It is *969 sufficient to conclude, as we do, that the Board did not act in an arbitrary or capricious manner, 29 Rombough v. F.A.A., 594 F.2d 893, 896-97 (2d Cir. 1979); Tiger Int’l, Inc. v. … We would be most reluctant to undertake an examination of the Board’s internal workings. See United States v. Morgan, 313 U.S. 409, 422 , 61 S.Ct. 999, 1004 , 85 L.Ed. 1429 (1941); Montrose Chemical Corp. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedRobert Bogan and Scott Bogan v. Austin E. Hodgkins, Jr., Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
166 F.3d 509 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 2, 1999
Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962); see also North Am. Soccer League v. … See NCAA v. Board of Regents, 468 U.S. 85, 109 , 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984).
Cited 51 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 12, 2015
14‐1754 Espinoza v. … Fund, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGagliardi v. Village Of Pawling
18 F.3d 188 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 9, 1994
See Heckler v. … Bd. of Ed. v.
Cited 112 timesPublished592 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 24, 1979
Moreover, we will not lightly disregard the Board’s expertise in assessing whether the party’s conduct evidences a sincere desire to reach agreement. N. L. R. B. v. … There is ample precedent for the Board’s authority to renew a certification year in its entirety, e. g., Cocker Saw Co. v. N. L. R.
Cited 30 timesPublishedFarrand Optical Co., Inc. v. The United States of America
325 F.2d 328 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 6, 1963
The Brown Box Mock-Up Farrand’s claim to reduction to practice rests upon the construction prior to March 10, 1945, of a device which embodied the optical principles set forth in claim 4. It was housed in a brown box. … The trial court, however, held that the brown box mock-up constituted “reduction to practice” under the law.
Cited 27 timesPublished248 F. App'x 232 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 26, 2007
United States v. Walsh, 194 F.3d 37, 50 (2d Cir.1999). … Corp. v. Newhouse, 236 F.2d 522, 525 (2d Cir.1956). Moreover, there is no evidence that Dawn Brown was prejudiced by the district court’s decision.
Cited 130 timesPublishedSamuel v. New York City Board of Education
668 F. App'x 381 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 29, 2016
15-2843-cv Samuel v. New York City Board of Education, et al. … Powell v. Omnicom, 497 F.3d 124, 128 (2d Cir. 2007).
Cited 7 timesUnpublished228 F.2d 589 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 22, 1955
B. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 326 U.S. 376, 390 , 66 S.Ct. 203 , 90 L.Ed. 145 , concerning the valid scope of a decree enforcing an order of the Board, have been met.
Cited 11 timesPublishedUnited States v. James Kaylor, Willie Glen Hopkins
491 F.2d 1133 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 11, 1974
See United States v. Brown, 470 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1973). … See, e. g., United States v. Brown, 479 F.2d 1170, 1172-1173 (2d Cir. 1973). 11 . See also United States v. Forrest, 157 U.S.App.D.C. 188 , 482 F.2d 777 (1973) ; United States v.
Vacated on other grounds by United States v. Hopkins, 418 U.S. 909 (1974)Cited 24 timesPublished590 F.3d 186 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 23, 2009
The motions were filed by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (fik/a Credit Suisse First Boston LLC), Banc of America Securities LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Grant Thornton LLP, Mayer Brown LLP, Mayer Brown International … .”); Henry v. Allen, 151 N.Y. 1, 9 , 45 N.E. 355 (1896); 546-552 West 146th Street LLC v.
Cited 23 timesPublished795 F.2d 1128 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 16, 1986
Jodry, Reginald V. Young, Randolph Cox, Martine A. Flory, Frank Savona, Bobby G. Simmons, Sr., Chrisy J. Enos, Jr., Christine Buffon, Maurice M. Beebe, Jr., Linda R. McCoy, Laurie Brown, George A. Enos, Jr., Tammy L. … Jones v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedJacobs v. New York Foundling Hospital
577 F.3d 93 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 11, 2009
PER CURIAM: Appellants Linda Jacobs, Wendy Slaughter, Kenneth Brown, and the remainder of the class are former employees (“Employees”) of the Foster and Boarding Home Programs operated by appellee New York Foundling Hospital … See Greene v.
Cited 74 timesPublishedForte v. Liquidnet Holdings, Inc.
675 F. App'x 21 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 10, 2017
Brown v. Daikin Am., Inc., 766 F.3d 219, 230 (2d Cir. 2014). Forte has failed to produce any evidence that her proposed comparators were appropriate. Alfred Eskandar, her predecessor as head of U.S. … excluded from board meetings, let alone that she was excluded for gender-based reasons.
Cited 21 timesPublished
Ask Donna