Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.12s
394 F.3d 90 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 2005
However, in Daniels v. … In Powell v.
Cited 30 timesPublished115 F. App'x 465 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 6, 2004
Following the planning board’s indication that the proposal did not conform to the zoning provisions, R-Goshen and the planning board continued to discuss possible modifications to R-Goshen’s plan. … R-Goshen did not press the board to a final determination and, instead, brought this suit.
Cited 8 timesPublishedHoffman v. Inn Credible Caterers, Ltd.
247 F.3d 360 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 11, 2001
But this is an enterprise best left ultimately to the expertise of the Board. See NLRB v. DeBartelo, 241 F.3d 207 , 212 n. 9 (2d Cir.2001). … 'any final order of the Board will be meaningless or so devoid of force that the remedial purposes of the [NLRA] will be frustrated’ ”); Kinney v.
Cited 18 timesPublished599 F.2d 1111 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 29, 1979
Juan’s son, David, 2 was elected first to the board of ABT Corp. and then to the board of ABT, Juan succeeding him as director of ABT Corp. … See FDIC v.
Cited 51 timesPublishedHarry Keyishian v. Board Of Regents Of The University Of The State Of New York
345 F.2d 236 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 3, 1965
Starbuck, Appellants, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF the STATE OF NEW YORK, Board of Trustees of the State University of New York, State University of New York at Buffalo, Clifford C. Furnas, J. … Ed.2d 982 (1961); Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction, 368 U.S. 278, 288 , 82 S.Ct. 275 , 7 L.Ed.2d 285 (1961); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 , 81 S.Ct. 247 , 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960); Slochower v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedChicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Clark
92 F. 968 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 15, 1899
See Lestienne v. Ernst (1896) 5 App. Div. 373 , 39 N. Y. Supp. 199 ; Lumber Co. v. Brown (1896) 68 Vt. 239 , 35 Atl. 56 ; Hills v. Sommer, 53 Hun, 392 , 6 N. Y. Supp. 469 . … Brown (1896) 68 Vt. 239 , 35 Atl. 56 ; Fuller v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 2019
17-3350 (L) United States v. … United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSouthard v. Bennett, Day & Co.
1 F.2d 16 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 27, 1924
v. … This return eargo was (as found by the court) “expressly laden on board as the property of Chambers on his account and risk.”
Cited 6 timesPublished999 F.2d 647 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 23, 1993
Brown v. New York State Division of Parole, 70 N.Y.2d 391, 398 , 521 N.Y.S.2d 657 , 516 N.E.2d 194 (1987). … See Sample v.
Cited 81 timesPublished438 F.2d 100 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 16, 1970
United States v. Mine Workers of America, 330 U.S. 258, 304 , 67 S.Ct. 677 , 91 L.Ed. 884 (1947).
Cited 10 timesPublishedColt's Patent Firearms Mfg. Co. v. New York Sporting Goods Co.
190 F. 563 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 5, 1911
There are at least nine of them, and the particular devices securing some one of these objects may evidently be used in weapons which do not present all the specific details of Browning’s complete pistol. … It is shown by the testimony that ordnance boards consider it a desirable thing to have firearms “capable of being readily dismounted and assembled, using as few tools as practicable.”
Cited 0 timesPublished415 F.2d 692 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 17, 1969
Brown, Jr., and J. G. Schulmeisters, New York City, on the brief), for appellant. Eugene Underwood, New York City (Burlingham, Underwood, Wright, White & Lord, Kenneth H. Volk, and Frank L. … Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Texas Co., 98 F.2d 719 (2d Cir. 1938). American argues that after sounding her danger signal, the Erna was under a duty to sound a two-blast signal for a star-board-to-starboard passage.
Cited 1 timesPublished395 F.2d 401 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 13, 1968
See also Scofield v. NLRB, 393 F.2d 49 (7th Cir. March 5, 1968). And in NLRB v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. … See NLRB v. Local 2 of United Ass’n of Journeymen, etc., supra; United Nuclear Corp. v. NLRB, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublishedKenneth R. Stella v. Selective Service System of the United States of America, Local Board No. 66
427 F.2d 887 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 8, 1970
Section 10(b) (3) of the Military Selective Service Act of 1967, in pertinent part, provides that “[n]o judicial review shall be made of the classification or processing of any registrant by local boards, appeal boards, or … Breen v. Selective Service Board, 396 U.S. 460, 462 , 90 S.Ct. 661 , 24 L.Ed.2d 653 (1970); Oestereich v. Selective Service Board, 393 U.S. 233, 238 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968).
Cited 7 timesPublishedUnited States v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.
297 F. 971 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 18, 1924
The agreement lacks every essential element of a trust fund and that conclusion is so plain that we are content to rest with the excellent definition in Brown v. Spohr, 87 App. Div. 522, 529 , 84 N. Y. … “To: War Credits Board. “Subject: Duties of the Board. “1.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFinnegan v. Board Of Education Of The Enlarged City School District Of Troy
30 F.3d 273 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 6, 1994
FINNEGAN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … See, e.g., Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 285-87 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 575-76 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977).
Cited 0 timesPublished481 F.2d 75 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 5, 1973
A unit finding by the Board ‘involves of necessity a large measure of informed discretion,’ Packard Motor Car Co. v. … See Wheeler-Van Label Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished818 F.2d 194 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 21, 1987
Civil Aeronautics Board, 473 F.Supp. 242 (S.D.N.Y.1979); Kantor v. Kahn, 463 F.Supp. 1160, 1162-64 (S.D.N.Y.1979); Founding Church of Scientology v. … Brown, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 (1954), and cases such as Broudy v. United States, 661 F.2d 125 (9th Cir.1981), and Stanley v.
Cited 35 timesPublishedIntercommunity Center for Justice & Peace v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
910 F.2d 42 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 27, 1990
See, e.g., Employment Div. v. Smith, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 1595, 1604-05 , 108 L.Ed.2d 876 (1990); Smith v. Board of Educ., 844 F.2d 90, 93 (2d Cir.1988). In NLRB v. … Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 603-04 , 81 S.Ct. 1144, 1146 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961); see also Smith, 110 S.Ct. at 1599-1600 ; Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 166-67 , 25 L.Ed. 244 (1879).
Cited 1 timesPublishedInnovative Health Systems, Inc. v. City Of White Plains
117 F.3d 37 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 26, 1997
Doe v. … See Warth v.
Superseded by statute, as recognized in Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc.Cited 17 timesPublished
Ask Donna