Case law

Jim Beam Brands Co. v. Beamish & Crawford Ltd.

937 F.2d 729 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 19, 1991

In an opinion dated February 24, 1988 (“Board Decision”), the Board concluded that Jim Beam had introduced insufficient evidence to prove public awareness of a BEAM family of marks, and the Board therefore compared the BEAMISH … See, e.g., Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 139 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 2213 n. 10, 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); Balderman v. United States Veterans Administration, 870 F.2d at 62 .

Li v. Holder

330 F. App'x 243 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 26, 2009

See Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 89-90 (2d Cir.2001). See also Chhetry v. U.S. … Mukasey, 520 F.3d 119, 124-25 (2d Cir.2008) (finding a petitioner ineligible for § 212(c) relief because he had served over five years in prison before applying for the relief); Brown v.

New York Printing Pressmen & Offset Workers Union No. 51 v. National Labor Relations Board

538 F.2d 496 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 21, 1976

We therefore reverse the Board’s dismissal of the complaint. In NLRB v. … Because the Board found, that the Employer stated “wouldn’t” when the evidence discloses that it claimed it “couldn’t ” meet the Union’s demands, see United Fire Proof Warehouse Co. v.

New York Mailers' Union No. Six, International Typographical Union v. National Labor Relations Board

327 F.2d 292 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 28, 1964

[National] Labor [Relations] Board v. United Steelworkers [of America, C. I. O.], supra [357 U.S. at 357], at 362-363 [ 78 S.Ct. at 1271 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1383 ].” N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. Brown, 319 F.2d 7 (10 Cir.), petition for cert, filed, 84 S.Ct. 484 (U. S.

Li v. Holder

330 F. App'x 243 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 26, 2009

See Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 89-90 (2d Cir.2001). See also Chhetry v. U.S. … Mukasey, 520 F.3d 119, 124-25 (2d Cir.2008) (finding a petitioner ineligible for § 212(c) relief because he had served over five years in prison before applying for the relief); Brown v.

Lodges 743 & 1746, International Ass'n of Machinists Workers v. United Aircraft Corp.

534 F.2d 422 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 9, 1975

E. g., Brown & Root, Inc., 132 NLRB 486 (1961), enforced, 311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963). … Members Fanning and Brown dissented on this issue.

National Labor Relations Board v. Knitgoods Workers Union Local 155, International Ladies Garment Workers, Afl-Cio

403 F.2d 388 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 14, 1968

The Board's determination of the Union's objective is a question of fact, N.L.R.B. v. Local 182, supra, 314 F.2d at 58 , which must be affirmed if supported by substantial evidence. NLRB v. … Although this is not a case under § 8(b) (7) (C) of the Act where the Board must determine the effect of the picketing, NLRB v.

Philip Morris, Inc. Rj Reynolds Tobacco Co. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, USA Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General

123 F.3d 103 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 12, 1997

MINER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appella-nts Philip Morris, Inc., RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, USA, and Lorillard Tobacco Co. … See Cate v. Oldham, 707 F.2d 1176, 1183 (11th Cir.1983); see also Moore v.

The Board of Managers of the Charles House Condominium v. Infinity Corporation and Schnurmacher Bros.

21 F.3d 528 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 7, 1994

See Board of Managers of the Charles House Condominium v. Infinity Corp., 825 F.Supp. 597 (S.D.N.Y.1993). The board now appeals. FACTS AND BACKGROUND In 1955 defendant Schnurmacher Bros. … Co. v. 181 E. 73rd Street Tenants Corp., 954 F.2d 45, 45-46 (2d Cir.1992); Cromwell Assocs. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local One-L, Amalgamated Lithographers of America

344 F. App'x 663 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 1, 2009

We will enforce a Board order “where [the Board’s] legal conclusions are reasonably based, and its factual findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.” NLRB v. … Ry. and Motor Coach Employees of Am. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

428 F.2d 994 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 18, 1970

See Brown Transport Corp. v. NLRB, 334 F.2d 30, 39 (5 Cir. 1964). … The Board argues that it is possible for picketing to be illegal despite the presence of a purpose which is, in and of itself, legitimate, NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Heights-West Harlem-Inwood Mental Health Council, Inc.

897 F.2d 1238 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 6, 1990

Mastro Plastics Corp. v. … See NLRB v.

Walentas v. Lipper

862 F.2d 414 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 25, 1988

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 570 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … S & D Maintenance, 844 F.2d at 970 -71 (quoting Brandt v. Board of Coop. Educ. Services, 820 F.2d 41 , 43 (2d Cir.1987) (in turn quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 573, 92 S.Ct. at 2707 )).

National Labor Relations Board v. Thalbo Corporation and G.B. Motel Management, D/B/A Ramada Inn Newburgh

171 F.3d 102 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 16, 1999

See, e.g., Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 139 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); Balderman v. United States Veterans Administration, 870 F.2d 57, 62 (2d Cir.1989). … The Board has broad discretion in fashioning remedies to achieve Congress’s purposes, see, e.g., Sure-Tan, Inc. v. NLRB, 467 U.S. 883, 898-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2803 , 81 L.Ed.2d 732 (1984); NLRB v.

In re Prudence Co.

88 F.2d 420 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 1, 1937

Benedict v. Ratner, supra; Brown v. Leo, 12 F.(2d) 350 (C.C.A.2). The grant of unfettered dominion makes the pledge fraudulent and void in toto as to creditors. … Manufacturers Finance Co. v. Armstrong, supra. In Parker v.

United States v. Mowbray's Floating Equipment Exchange, Inc.

601 F.2d 645 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 15, 1979

See also Mamiye Bros. v. … No request for permission to board her was made of or required by Ellis. In fact an employee of Atmanchuck was on board the vessel earlier in the evening on the very night the vessel sank.

The W. G. Mason

142 F. 913 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 5, 1905

Van Eyken v. Erie R. … “It limits the shipowner’s liability in three classes of damage or wrong happening without their privity, and by the fault or neglect of the master or other person on board.” Norwich Co. v.

Beaudiere v. Mukasey

271 F. App'x 44 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 26, 2008

See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005). … See Iavorski v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Accurate Web, Inc, Local One, Amalgamated Lithographers of America, Intervenor

818 F.2d 273 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 6, 1987

Brooks v. NLRB, 348 U.S. 96, 103-04 , 75 S.Ct. 176, 181-82 , 99 L.Ed. 125 (1954). … See, e.g., NLRB v. Vantran Electric Corp., 580 F.2d 921, 924 (7th Cir.1978).

Maintenance Co., Inc. v. Goldin

844 F.2d 962 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 14, 1988

Board of Regents v. … Brown v. Brienen, 722 F.2d 360, 364 (7th Cir.1983).