Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Innovative Facility Services, LC

310 F. App'x 415 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 16, 2008

We grant the NLRB’s decision to certify a Union “considerable deference” and review only to determine “whether the Board reasonably exercised its discretion.” NLRB v. … We review the Board’s factual findings under a “substantial evidence” standard, upholding the Board’s factual determinations “unless no rational trier of fact could have arrived at the Board’s conclusion.” NLRB v.

Truck Drivers Local Union No. 449 v. National Labor Relations Board

231 F.2d 110 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 14, 1956

In the instant case, the Board departed from its previous position by adopting the position of the Ninth Circuit in Leonard v. N. L. R. … B. v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp., 303 U.S. 240 , 255-256, 59 S.Ct. 490 , 83 L.Ed. 627 . . N. L. R. B. v. Wallick, 3 Cir., 198 F.2d 477 ; N. L. R. B. v.

Seaside Improvement Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

105 F.2d 990 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 17, 1939

Matter of City of New York, 222 N.Y. 370, 373 , 118 N.E. 807 ; Woodward-Brown Realty Co. v. City of New York, 235 N.Y. 278 , 139 N.E. 267 . … Drier v. Helvering, 63 App.D.C. 283 , 72 F.2d 76 ; Commissioner v. Speyer, 2 Cir., 77 F.2d 824 ; Helvering v. Drier, 4 Cir., 79 F.2d 501 .

The Travelers Indemnity Company v. George K. Sarkisian, John Sarkisian, Norman Preskitt, Ivy Mechanical & Electrical Associates, Inc., Sarkisian Brothers, Inc., Sarco Industries, Inc., Sarbro Equipment Corp., and John Doe and Richard Roe, Said Names Being Fictitious but Meant to Designate the Officers, Employees And/or Agents of the Aforesaid Presently Unknown to the Who Participated in the Acts Set Forth Herein, the Travelers Indemnity Company, as Assignee of Judgments Against Midstate Constructors, Inc., to Enforce Certain Judgments v. George Sarkisian, John Sarkisian, Norman Preskitt, Sarco Industries, Inc., Charlotte Street Builders, Inc., and Sarkisian Brothers, Inc., Respondents

794 F.2d 754 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 19, 1986

Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, supra; Long Island Railroad Co. v. … See, e.g., Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, supra. IV.

In Re Coleman

87 F.2d 753 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 8, 1937

Memberships in a Board of Trade or Stock Exchange constitute assets of the bankrupt though they are subject to conditions of forfeiture, suspension, and termination. Board of Trade of Chicago v. … Ct. 232 , 68 L.Ed. 533 ; Page v. Edmunds, 187 U.S. 596 , 23 S.Ct. 200 , 47 L.Ed. 318 ; Board of Trade, etc., v. Weston, 243 F. 332 (C.C.A.7).

National Labor Relations Board v. Wizard Method, Inc., and Hydro Logistics, Inc.

897 F.2d 1233 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 6, 1990

See NLRB v. S.E. Nichols, 862 F.2d at 957 . … See generally NLRB v.

Ocampo v. Brown & Appel, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 15, 2022

21-2579-cv Ocampo, et al. v. … McKinney v.

Bausch & Lomb Optical Company v. National Labor Relations Board

217 F.2d 575 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 1, 1954

We hold that there was substantial evidence for the Board's finding of discriminatory discharge with respect to Brown. N.L.R.B. v. Vermont Am. Furniture Corp., 2 Cir., 182 F.2d 842 ; N.L.R.B. v. … N.L.R.B. v. Somerest Classics, Inc., supra, 2 Cir., 193 F.2d 613 ; N.L.R.B. v. Shedd-Brown Mfg.

College Savings Bank, and United States v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board

148 F.3d 1343 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 30, 1998

See Brown v. Duchesne, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 183, 197 , 15 L.Ed. 595 (1856) (“For, by the laws of the United States, the rights of a party under a patent are his private property.”). … May v. Board of Comm’rs, 30 F. 250, 261 (C.C.N.D.Ohio 1887) (holding that Ohio counties could be sued for patent infringement).

Scott v. El Farra Enterprises, Inc.

863 F.2d 670 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 19, 1988

[Citing Kennedy v. Los Angeles Joint Executive Board, 192 F.Supp. 339 , 341 (S.D.Cal.1961).] … Id. at 517 n. 1 (citing Brown v.

Thomas H. Fitzgerald v. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York

388 F.2d 400 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 2, 1968

But in Brown the Court was careful to distinguish conflict-of-interest laws of which Section 723 is an example, and indicated that its holding was not contrary to Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System v. … Swift & Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Innovative Facility Services, LC

310 F. App'x 415 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 16, 2008

We grant the NLRB’s decision to certify a Union “considerable deference” and review only to determine “whether the Board reasonably exercised its discretion.” NLRB v. … We review the Board’s factual findings under a “substantial evidence” standard, upholding the Board’s factual determinations “unless no rational trier of fact could have arrived at the Board’s conclusion.” NLRB v.

United States v. William H. Jackson

542 F.2d 162 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 20, 1976

United States v. Hartford, 489 F.2d 652 (5th Cir. 1974), which we distinguished in United States v. Torun, 537 F.2d 661 (2d Cir. 1976). … We are cited to Corey v.

F. & M. Schaefer Corp. v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.

597 F.2d 814 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 3, 1979

Shoe Co. v. … As the Supreme Court stated in Brown Shoe Co. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Star Color Plate Service

843 F.2d 1507 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 30, 1988

NLRB v. Connecticut Foundry Co., 688 F.2d 871 (2d Cir.1982) and NLRB v. Nixon Gear, Inc., 649 F.2d 906 (2d Cir.1981). … See NLRB v.

Robert T. Ewing v. National Labor Relations Board, Herbert F. Darling, Inc., Intervenor

861 F.2d 353 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 4, 1988

In Ewing v. NLRB, 732 F.2d 1117 (2d Cir.1984) {“Ewing I”), we reversed the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB” or “Board”) finding that Herbert R. Darling, Inc. … Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251, 266 , 95 S.Ct. 959, 968 , 43 L.Ed.2d 171 (1975) (quoting NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965)).

National Labor Relations Board v. Suffolk County District Council of Carpenters, Afl-Cio

387 F.2d 170 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 13, 1967

See NLRB v. Local 3, IBEW, 317 F.2d 193, 198 (2d Cir. 1963) ; Local Joint Executive Board of Hotel Employees (Crown Cafeteria II), 135 N.L.R.B. 1183 (1962), petition to review denied sub nom. Smitley v. … Barker Brothers Corp. v. NLRB, 328 F.2d 431 (9th Cir. 1964). Substantial evidence for the Board’s findings having been found, we grant enforcement of the Board’s order. 1 . The examiner found that the.

Concerned Parents & Citizens for Continuing Education v. New York City Board of Education

629 F.2d 751 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 8, 1980

See also Harris v. Campbell, 472 F.Supp. 51 (E.D.Va.1979). … See also Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 3 Educ. of the Handicapped L.

National Labor Relations Board v. Habib Marcus, D/B/A Marcus Bros.

272 F.2d 253 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 1, 1959

B. v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co., 1937, 301 U.S. 58 , 57 S.Ct. 645 , 81 L.Ed. 921 ; N. L. R. B. v. Fain-blatt, 1939, 306 U.S. 601 , 307 U.S. 609 , 59 S.Ct. 668 , 83 L.Ed. 1014 ; Slater v. … A decree will be entered enforcing the order of the Board.

United States Ex Rel. Samuel D. Carthan v. Sheriff, City of New York

330 F.2d 100 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 6, 1964

Beilan v. Board of Public Education, 357 U.S. 399 , 78 S.Ct. 1317 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1414 (1958); Garner v. Board of Public Works, 341 U.S. 716 , 71 S.Ct. 909 , 95 L.Ed. 1317 (1951). And in Regan v. … See Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. 148 , 78 S.Ct. 622 , 2 L.Ed.2d 589 (1958); Rogers v. United States, 340 U. S. 367 , 71 S.Ct. 438 , 95 L.Ed. 344 (1951). The judgment denying the writ is affirmed.