Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

2.39s

  • Angelus v. Sullivan

    246 F. 54 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 22, 1917

    Justice Brown, speaking for the court as to the jurisdiction of a court of equity, cites approvingly In re Sawyer, supra, saying that no further reference is deemed necessary. In Truax v. Raich, 239 U. … Fletcher v. Tuttle, 151 Ill. 41, 53 , 37 N. E. 683 , 25 L. R. A. 143, 42 Am. St. Rep. 220 (1894); City of Chicago v. Chicago City Ry. Co., 222 Ill. 560, 570 , 78 N. E. 890 (1906); Brown v.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Local 1104, Communications Workers Of America, Afl-Cio, v. National Labor Relations Board

    520 F.2d 411 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 21, 1975

    NLRB v. … Vaca v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Altmeyer

    137 F.2d 531 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 12, 1943

    . § 405(g), to compel the payment of primary insurance benefits after these had been denied by the Social Security Board. John E. … Gray v. Powell, 314 U.S. 402 , 62 S.Ct. 326 , 86 L.Ed. 301 .

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • J.C. ex rel. C. v. Regional School District 10, Board of Education

    278 F.3d 119 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 24, 2002

    J.C. v. Reg. Sch. Dist. No. 10, 115 F.Supp.2d 297 (D.Conn.2000). Following the District Court’s decision and the Board’s notice of appeal, the Supreme Court decided Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. … Following the District Court’s decision and the appeal to this Court, the Supreme Court decided Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cohen v. Board of Education, Smithtown Central School District, No. 1

    728 F.2d 160 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 27, 1984

    Maine-Endwell Teachers Ass’n v. Maine-Endwell Cent. School Dist., 92 A.D.2d 1052, 1053 , 461 N.Y.S.2d 537 (1983); see Griffith v. Board of Educ., Mount Pleasant Central School Dist. … See MaineEndwell Teachers Ass’n v. Maine-Endwell Cent. School Dist., supra, 92 A.D.2d at 1053 , 461 N.Y.S.2d 537 ; Coates v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. United Furniture Workers of America, Afl-Cio

    337 F.2d 936 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 28, 1964

    B. v. Local 182, Teamsters, 2 Cir., 314 F.2d 53 (1963). … Bakery and Pastry Drivers and Helpers, Local 802, Teamsters v. Wohl, 315 U.S. 769, 776-777 , 62 S.Ct. 816, 819-820 , 86 L.Ed. 1178 (1942) (concurring opinion).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Local 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    740 F.2d 141 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 19, 1984

    This standard of review applies even in a case such as this in which the ALJ and Board reached contrary conclusions from the same set of facts. See Universal Camera Corp. v. … The role of this court is to determine “whether or not there is any substantial evidence supporting the Board’s views; if there is, those views must prevail.” NLRB v. Donald E.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Straus Communications, Inc., Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross

    625 F.2d 458 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 30, 1980

    FEINBERG, Chief Judge: In NLRB v. … Citing Pride Refining, Inc. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Leebaert v. Harrington

    332 F.3d 134 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 13, 2003

    In Brown v. … In Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions, Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 539 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1159 , 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996), Miller v.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Securities And Exchange Commission v. The American Board Of Trade, Inc.

    829 F.2d 341 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 22, 1987

    829 F.2d 341 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. The AMERICAN BOARD OF TRADE, INC., Arthur N. Economou, Phyllis H. … Economou, and the American Board of Trade Service Corp., Defendants, The American Board of Trade, Inc., and the American Board of Trade Service Corp., Defendants-Appellees, Arthur N. Economou and Phyllis H.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Heaney v. Allen

    425 F.2d 869 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 5, 1970

    Brown of the Fifth Circuit in Jackson v. … See Green v. Board of Elections of City of New York, 380 F.2d 445, 448-449 (1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1048 , 88 S.Ct. 768 , 19 L.Ed.2d 840 (1968); Miller v. New York Stock Exchange, supra, 425 F.2d 1074 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • New England Health Care Employees Union, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board

    448 F.3d 189 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 19, 2006

    . 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); see also NLRB v. … Ass'n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stagehands Referral Service, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

    315 F. App'x 318 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 12, 2009

    According to the Union Parties, the Board should have applied Holo-Krome Co. v. NLRB, 954 F.2d 108 (2d Cir.1992). … circumstances.”); NLRB v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • P.S. ex rel. J.S. v. Brookfield Board of Education

    186 F. App'x 79 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 19, 2006

    Island Software & Computer Serv. v. Microsoft Corp., 418 F.3d 257, 260 (2005). … P.S. also argues that the school psychologist the Board sought to have evaluate him was not a “qualified professional” and could have put him at risk of harm. Dubois v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    501 F. App'x 47 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 26, 2012

    11-4663-cr United States v. … As the district court identified the proper Guidelines range and sentenced Brown accordingly, we cannot conclude that the sentence in this case was either procedurally or substantively unreasonable. See United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Horner v. Kentucky High School Athletic Association

    43 F.3d 265 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 10, 1995

    Brown Univ., 991 F.2d 888, 894 (1st Cir.1993). 37 If facts are proved consistent with plaintiffs' opposition to the Board's motion for summary judgment, we would have no difficulty concluding that the Board is a "recipient … Roberts v. Colorado State Bd. of Agric., 998 F.2d 824 , 829 n. 5, 831 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 580 , 126 L.Ed.2d 478 (1993); Cohen v. Brown Univ., 991 F.2d 888, 901-02 (1st Cir.1993).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    920 F.2d 130 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 27, 1990

    V. Due process requires the Board to afford an alleged violator notice and an opportunity for a hearing on a charge under the Act, see N.L.R.B. v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., 811 F.2d 82, 87 (2d Cir.1987); N.L.R.B. v. … It was appropriate for the ALJ and the Board to make a credibility determination. N.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Truck Drivers Local Union No. 449 v. National Labor Relations Board

    231 F.2d 110 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 14, 1956

    In the instant case, the Board departed from its previous position by adopting the position of the Ninth Circuit in Leonard v. N. L. R. … B. v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp., 303 U.S. 240 , 255-256, 59 S.Ct. 490 , 83 L.Ed. 627 . . N. L. R. B. v. Wallick, 3 Cir., 198 F.2d 477 ; N. L. R. B. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Seaside Improvement Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    105 F.2d 990 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 17, 1939

    Matter of City of New York, 222 N.Y. 370, 373 , 118 N.E. 807 ; Woodward-Brown Realty Co. v. City of New York, 235 N.Y. 278 , 139 N.E. 267 . … Drier v. Helvering, 63 App.D.C. 283 , 72 F.2d 76 ; Commissioner v. Speyer, 2 Cir., 77 F.2d 824 ; Helvering v. Drier, 4 Cir., 79 F.2d 501 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • In Re Coleman

    87 F.2d 753 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 8, 1937

    Memberships in a Board of Trade or Stock Exchange constitute assets of the bankrupt though they are subject to conditions of forfeiture, suspension, and termination. Board of Trade of Chicago v. … Ct. 232 , 68 L.Ed. 533 ; Page v. Edmunds, 187 U.S. 596 , 23 S.Ct. 200 , 47 L.Ed. 318 ; Board of Trade, etc., v. Weston, 243 F. 332 (C.C.A.7).

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.