Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.97s
Zheng Zhong Zhang v. Board of Immigration Appeals
164 F. App'x 203 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 6, 2006
See Twum v. INS, 411 F.3d 54, 58 (2d Cir. 2005). … Cao He Lin v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 428 F.3d 391, 395 (2d Cir .2005).
Cited 0 timesPublishedYong Jin Li v. Board of Immigration Appeals
166 F. App'x 524 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 9, 2006
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the petition for review is DENIED. … See United States v. Copeland, 376 F.3d 61, 68 (2d Cir.2004) (stating that an alien’s knowing and voluntary waiver of his rights is effective to insulate the decision from review).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWei Ming Wu v. Board of Immigration Appeals
169 F. App'x 76 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 27, 2006
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. … See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Jin Hui Gao v. United States Att’y Gen., 400 F.3d 963, 964 (2d Cir.2005); Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73-79 ; Ramsameachire v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYong Si Chen v. Board of Immigration Appeals
164 F. App'x 187 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 2, 2006
See Kaur v. BIA 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam); Khouzam v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 161, 165 (2d Cir.2004) (citing Brice v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 806 F.2d 415, 419 (2d Cir.1986)). … See Kaur v. BIA 413 F.3d at 233 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedJi Yan Qiu v. Board of Immigration Appeals
164 F. App'x 131 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 27, 2006
See Xue Hong Yang v. DOJ, 426 F.3d 520, 522 (2d Cir.2005). … Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 307 (2d Cir.2003). C. CAT Claim Because Qiu did not raise his CAT claim before Court, the claim is deemed waived. See Yueqing Zhang v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYun Qing Xiao v. Board of Immigration Appeals
166 F. App'x 575 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 13, 2006
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DE *576 CREED that the petition for review is DENIED. … . § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Jin Hui Gao v. United States Att’y Gen., 400 F.3d 963, 964 (2d Cir.2005); Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73-74 (2d ir.2004); Ramsameachire v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChang Ten Jiang v. Board of Immigration Appeals
165 F. App'x 6 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 4, 2006
See Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 305 (2d Cir.2003). … See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73 (2d Cir.2004).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJiao Ru Lin v. Board of Immigration Appeals
165 F. App'x 107 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 1, 2006
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. … See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73 (2d Cir.2004). The IJ relied, in part, on omissions in Lin’s airport interview. In Ramsameachire v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYu Shu Feng v. Board of Immigration Appeals
165 F. App'x 76 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 31, 2006
. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Jin Hui Gao v. United States Att’y Gen., 400 F.3d 963, 964 (2d Cir.2005); Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73-79 ; Ramsameachire v. Ashcroft, 357 F.3d 169, 178-83 (2d Cir.2004); Secaida-Rosales v. … INS, 331 F.3d 297, 306-13 (2d Cir.2003); Diallo v. INS, 232 F.3d 279, 286-88 (2d Cir.2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedYue Xian Lin v. Board of Immigration Appeals
164 F. App'x 70 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 25, 2006
See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). … found where the BIA’s decision “ ‘provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or eonclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedHerzfeld v. Federal Trade Commission
140 F.2d 207 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 1, 1944
Balme, 2 Cir., 23 F.2d 615 ; Brown Fence & Wire Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 6 Cir., 64 F.2d 934, 936 ; Pep BoysManny, Moe & Jack, Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission, 3 Cir., 122 F.2d 158, 161 ; Bockenstette v. … International Ass’n of Machinists v. National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 72, 82 , 61 S.Ct. 83 , 85 L.Ed. 50 ; Phelps Dodge Corp. v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedMing Qing Gao v. Board of Immigration Appeals
164 F. App'x 91 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 25, 2006
Ming Qing Gao petitions for review of the December 2004 decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings. … See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam); Khouzam v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 161, 165 (2d Cir.2004) (citing Brice v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 806 F.2d 415, 419 (2d Cir.1986)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedItt Lighting Fixtures, Division of Itt Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
658 F.2d 934 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 1, 1981
Catholic Medical Ctr. of Brooklyn, etc. v. NLRB, supra, 620 F.2d at 22; Turner’s Express, Incorporated v. NLRB, supra; NLRB v. Alamo Express, Inc., 430 F.2d 1032, 1035 (5th Cir. 1970). Cf. NLRB v. … Smith, V. Massey, D. Abbott, T. Henley, C. Brown, and B. Jackson. (J.A. pp. 147-148). 11 .
Cited 14 timesPublishedTing Jie Li v. Board of Immigration Appeals
163 F. App'x 68 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 20, 2006
Wang v. Ashcroft, 320 F.3d 130, 133 (2d Cir.2003). … See Zhang v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouthern Regional Joint Board of Unite v. May Department Stores Co.
171 F.3d 754 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 25, 1999
Plaintiffs-Appellants Union of Needle-trades, Industrial & Textile Employees (“Unite”), The Southern Regional Joint Board of Unite, and The May Company Independent Shareholders Committee (collectively, “UNITE”) appeal from … This motion was granted by the district court on November 14, 1997, in Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees (“Unite") et al. v. May Department Stores Company, 26 F.Supp.2d 577 (S.D.N.Y.1997).
Cited 1 timesPublishedXu Zheng Chen v. Board of Immigration Appeals
163 F. App'x 55 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 19, 2006
. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Jin Hui Gao v. United States Att’y Gen., 400 F.3d 963, 964 (2d Cir.2005); Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73-79 (2d Cir.2004). … Nov.15, 2005) (quoting Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, *57 386 F.3d 66, 76 (2d Cir.2004) (emphasis in Majidij).
Cited 0 timesPublishedQiang Ping Chen v. Board of Immigration Appeals
160 F. App'x 52 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 19, 2005
See, e.g., Twum v. INS, 411 F.3d 54, 58 (2d Cir.2005). While we review the IJ’s rulings of law de novo. Ramsameachire v. … . § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Jin Hui Gao v. United States Attorney General, 400 F.3d 963, 964 (2d Cir.2005); Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73 (2d Cir.2004).
Cited 0 timesPublishedZhou Hui Ni v. Board of Immigration Appeals
163 F. App'x 23 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 4, 2006
See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Jin Hui Gao v. United States Att’y Gen., 400 F.3d 963, 964 (2d Cir.2005); Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS, 386 F.3d 66, 73-79 (2d Cir.2004); Ramsameachire v. … See Cao He Lin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBenson v. New York City Board of Education
161 F. App'x 83 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 28, 2005
See Young v. County of Fulton, 160 F.3d 899, 902 (2d Cir.1998). … See Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21 , 114 S.Ct. 367 , 126 L.Ed.2d 295 (1993); Williams v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYi Qing Wang v. Board of Immigration Appeals
164 F. App'x 16 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 19, 2005
See Zhong Guang Sun v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 421 F.3d 105, 107 (2d Cir.2005); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a). … .; that is to say, where the Board has acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner.” Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d at 93.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna