Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. District 65, Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Union, Afl-Cio

375 F.2d 745 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 24, 1967

The Board adopted the Recommended Order of the Trial Examiner. 157 NLRB No. 52 . … A few specific incidents, all as found by the Trial Examiner and adopted by the Board, suffice to illustrate the aggravated character of the Union’s conduct. B. Brown Associates, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board v. Solis Theatre Corp., and Interboro Circuit, Inc.

403 F.2d 381 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 14, 1968

Labor Board, 330 U.S. 485 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947); N. L. R. B. v. St. John’s Associates, Inc., 392 F.2d 182 (2 Cir. 1968); N. L. R. B. v. … Finally, we are not persuaded to enforce the Board’s order on the basis of NLRB v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Eastern Connecticut Health Services, Inc.

815 F.2d 517 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 1987

Particularly since the Board is entitled to view such claims with skepticism when made by employers rather than employees, see Retired Persons Pharmacy v. … See NLRB v. Lee Office Equipment, 572 F.2d 704, 706-07 (9th Cir. 1978). The employer next makes several procedural attacks on the Board proceedings. None have merit.

In the Matter of Letters Rogatory Issued by the Director of Inspection of the Government of India to Take the Testimony of the President or Other Designated Representative of Messrs. Brown Brothers, Harriman & Company and the President or Other Designated Representative of Chase Manhattan Bank

385 F.2d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 9, 1967

This appeal by Jain and Brown Brothers, Harriman & Co. followed. 2 Although our appellate jurisdiction has not been questioned, we must consider this in the first instance. United States v. Fabric Garment Co. … Adityan v.

Patty v. Helvering

98 F.2d 717 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 18, 1938

Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 , 55 S.Ct. 266 , 79 L.Ed. 596 , 97 A.L.R. 1355 . The courts have more commonly than not limited the section to such situations. Commissioner v. Brown, 7 Cir., 69 F.2d 602 ; Hyman v. … Randolph v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 76 F.2d 472 ; Brown v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 79 F.2d 73 ; McGuire v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 84 F.2d 431 ; Parker v. United States, 7 Cir., 88 F.2d 907 .

Local 138, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio, and Its Welfare Fund and Trustees, William C. Dekoning v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Nassau and Suffolk Contractors Association

321 F.2d 130 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 8, 1963

v. … Notes: 1 See National Labor Relations Board v. Local 138, International Union of Operating Engineers, 293 F.2d 187 (2 Cir. 1961); National Labor Relations Board v.

Empire State Carpenters Welfare v. Conway Construction of Ithaca, Inc.

661 F. App'x 97 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 28, 2016

In reaching this conclusion, the District Court relied on Brown v. C. … . § 186 (c)(5)(B), if the employer’s “conduct manifested an intent to adopt, or agree to, the unsigned CBAs,” Brown, 194 F.3d at 355 .

Green Mountain Railroad Corporation v. State Of Vermont

404 F.3d 638 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 14, 2005

Hanson, General Counsel, on the brief) Washington, D.C. for Amicus Curiae Surface Transportation Board. Robert M. Jenkins III, David M. Gossett, Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP, Washington D.C.; Louis P. Warchot, Dennis J. … Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Local 294, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

284 F.2d 893 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 10, 1960

The Board’s Trial Examiner recommended that the complaint be dismissed, on two grounds. … B. v. International Ladies’ Garment Workers Union, 3 Cir., 1960, 274 F.2d 376 , refusing to enforce the Board’s order in 122 N. L. R.

United States of America Ex Rel. Herbert Sperling, Relator-Appellant v. Walter v. Fitzpatrick, Warden, West Street House of Detention

426 F.2d 1161 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 12, 1970

Parole Board Directive No. 1, 28 C.F.R. § 2.35 (1969). The Parole Board is thus vested with the broadest discretion consistent with due process to act upon reliable evidence in revoking parole. See Hyser v. … But see Verdugo v. United States, 402 F.2d 599, 610-613 (9th Cir. 1968). . See Hyser v. Reed, supra, 318 F.2d at 243 ; United States v. Hallman, 365 F.2d 289, 291 (3d Cir. 1966) ; Brown v.

American Sterilizer Company v. Herbert T. Brown, Al Kevelson v. American Sterilizer Company

378 F.2d 237 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 1, 1967

Although the hospital was operated by Brown personally, the hospital realty was owned by the Howard Park Corporation, a corporation owned by Brown with Brown acting as both president and chairman of the board of directors … Wood v. Chapin, 13 N.Y. 509, 518 (1856); Rosenberg v. People, 12 Misc.2d 710 , 172 N.Y.S.2d 845, 847 (Sup.Ct.1958); Olsen v. Kleinhenz, Sup., 86 N.Y.S.2d 178 , 180 (Sup.Ct.1948).

Cunard S. S. Co. v. Elting

97 F.2d 373 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 6, 1938

He was 3}i inches taller than the passport description, and had dark brown' hair and blue eyes, whereas the passport owner was described as having blond hair and brown eyes. … Co. v. Marion County, 120 Tenn. 347 , 108 S.W. 1058 ; City of Covington v. Lovell, etc., Co., 204 Ky. 40 , 263 S.W. 676 ; see Williams v. Merritt, 152 Mich. 621 , 116 N.W. 386 ; Peninsula Iron, etc., Co. v.

Jennifer Baldwin Cook, Melissa Ehlers, Christine Price, Thayer Jaques, Julie Wolff v. Colgate University

992 F.2d 17 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 27, 1993

See Board of Sch. Comm’rs of Indianapolis v. Jacobs, 420 U.S. 128 , 128 n. *, 95 S.Ct. 848 , 849 n. *, 43 L.Ed.2d 74 (1975). … See Brandon v. Board of Educ. of Guilderland Cent. Sch.

Davis Ex Rel. Brown v. Baldwin

594 F. App'x 49 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 25, 2015

14-753 Davis v. … Brown, S. Brown, I. Brown and A.

Tomanio v. Board of Regents of University of New York

603 F.2d 255 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 19, 1979

Tomanio v. Board of Regents, 38 N.Y.2d 724 , 381 N.Y.S.2d 37 , 343 N.E.2d 755 (1975), aff’g. mem. 43 A.D.2d 643 , 349 N.Y.S.2d 806 (3rd Dept. 1973). Appellee was diligent in pressing her claims. … Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 , 43 S.Ct. 625 , 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923). See also, Board of Curators, University of Missouri v.

Peter D. Borsari v. Federal Aviation Administration, Merit Systems Protection Board, Intervenor

699 F.2d 106 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 1, 1983

On October 23, 1980, the Merit Systems Protection Board, on its own motion, reopened Borsari’s case. 2 The Board then held Borsari’s case in abeyance pending its decision in Merritt v. … In Masino v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Women's Wear Co.

159 F.2d 866 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 13, 1947

National Labor Relations Board v. Greater New York Broadcasting Corp., 2 Cir., 147 F.2d 337, 340 ; F. W. Woolworth Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 121 F.2d 658, 660 . … We cannot hold that there was no substantial evidence to support the Board’s inference that the employer’s motive for the discharge was to be rid of a persistent organizer for the Guild.

In Re Ivan F. Boesky Securities Litigation

36 F.3d 255 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 23, 1994

FMC Corp. v. … Turning first to Brown, we conclude that Goldman is not liable for Brown's acts because Brown did not act in the scope of his employment.

United States v. Brown (Blackwood)

366 F. App'x 207 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 17, 2010

08-5840-cr USA v. … Brown’s testimony in this respect was corroborated by the tape recording of the entire transaction, the DEA agent’s testimony concerning his field observations, and Brown’s testimony that he personally brokered the drug

Mei Xia Wang v. Board of Immigration Appeals

180 F. App'x 215 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 8, 2006

See Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). This Court reviews the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. See Kaur v. BIA 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir. 2005) (per curiam). … Kaur, 413 F.3d at 233-34 ; Ke Zhen Zhao v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 93 (2d Cir. 2001) (internal citations omitted).