Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

4.50s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. E.D.P. Medical Computer Systems, Inc.

    6 F.3d 951 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 8, 1993

    P 10,930 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner-Appellee, v. E.D.P. … Packers v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Tian Ming Huang v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    305 F. App'x 722 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 6, 2009

    See Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). … See 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (b)(1)(B)®; Yueqing Zhang v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. William Ludwig Ullmann

    221 F.2d 760 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 6, 1955

    It is well to add a few words about defendant’s contention concerning the doctrine of Brown v. … See also Picard v. United Aircraft Corp., 2 Cir., 128 F.2d 632, 636 ; Judge Parker’s opinion in Barnette v. West Virginia State Board of Education, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 251, 252-253 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Pride v. Community School Board of Brooklyn, New York School District

    488 F.2d 321 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 21, 1973

    Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 16 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971). 3 42 Appellants misconstrue Lee v. … They invoke the holding in Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Church Homes, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    303 F. App'x 998 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 29, 2008

    In New England Health Care Employees Union v. … See NLRB v. American Geri-Care, Inc., 697 F.2d 56, 60 (2d Cir.1982) (“[T]he findings of the Board cannot be lightly overturned, especially when these findings are based upon the Board’s assessment of credibility.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • B. G. Costich & Sons, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    613 F.2d 450 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 8, 1980

    B. v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 286 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 985 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). … B. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc., 388 U.S. 26 , 87 S.Ct. 1792 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1967); American Ship Building Co. v. N. L. R. B., supra; N. L. R. B. v. Brown, supra; N. L. R. B. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Xiu Ying Huang v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    301 F. App'x 85 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 5, 2008

    Kaur v. BIA 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005). … See, e.g., Wei Guang Wang v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Wine, Liquor & Distillery Workers Union, Local I

    178 F.2d 584 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 12, 1949

    178 F.2d 584 16 A.L.R.2d 762 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. WINE, LIQUOR & DISTILLERY WORKERS UNION, LOCAL I, DISTILLERY, RECTIFYING AND WINE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF AMERICA, A.F. 0F L. No. 29, Docket 2137-1. … Justice Black said in Giboney v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Confectionery & Tobacco Drivers & Warehousemen's Union v. National Labor Relations Board

    312 F.2d 108 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 1963

    B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332 , 59 S.Ct. 508 , 83 L.Ed. 682 (1939); Plasti-Line, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., 278 F.2d 482 (6 Cir. 1960); N. L. R. B. v. Draper Corp., 145 F.2d 199 (4 Cir. 1944). … B. v. Marshall Car Wheel & Foundry Co., 218 F.2d 409 (5 Cir. 1955); N. L. R. B. v. Draper Corp., supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. United Aircraft Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Division

    324 F.2d 128 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 6, 1963

    The Board found these to be questionable after-the-fact rationalizations and insufficient to explain the institution of the rule. The record sustains the Board’s finding. … Of course presumptions utilized by the Board must be rationally justifiable; there must be a logical nexus between what is proved and what is presumed. See Republic Aviation Corp. v. N. L. R.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Buffalo

    936 F.2d 122 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 27, 1991

    Grandee Beer Distributors, Inc. v. NLRB, 630 F.2d 928, 932 (2d Cir.1980) (citing Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951)). … In addition, it must be noted that the Board has broad discretion when passing on the appropriateness of disputed bargaining units. National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn v. National Labor Relations Board

    589 F.2d 1166 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 15, 1978

    In NLRB v. R. Dakin & Co., 477 F.2d 492, 493 (9 Cir. 1973), 7 the court set aside the Board’s bargaining order. … This was that in Gibson’s Discount Center, 214 NLRB 221 (1974), the Board applied NLRB v. Savair Mfg.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • New York University Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

    156 F.3d 405 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 25, 1998

    See Spentonbush, 106 F.3d at 492 (“the Board’s biased mishandling of cases involving supervisors increasingly has called into question our obeisance to the Board’s decisions in this area.”); Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. … See Meek v. United States, 608 F.2d 368, 373 (9th Cir.1979); see also Ezekiel v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. District 65, Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Union, Afl-Cio

    375 F.2d 745 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 24, 1967

    The Board adopted the Recommended Order of the Trial Examiner. 157 NLRB No. 52 . … A few specific incidents, all as found by the Trial Examiner and adopted by the Board, suffice to illustrate the aggravated character of the Union’s conduct. B. Brown Associates, Inc.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Solis Theatre Corp., and Interboro Circuit, Inc.

    403 F.2d 381 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 14, 1968

    Labor Board, 330 U.S. 485 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947); N. L. R. B. v. St. John’s Associates, Inc., 392 F.2d 182 (2 Cir. 1968); N. L. R. B. v. … Finally, we are not persuaded to enforce the Board’s order on the basis of NLRB v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Eastern Connecticut Health Services, Inc.

    815 F.2d 517 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 1987

    Particularly since the Board is entitled to view such claims with skepticism when made by employers rather than employees, see Retired Persons Pharmacy v. … See NLRB v. Lee Office Equipment, 572 F.2d 704, 706-07 (9th Cir. 1978). The employer next makes several procedural attacks on the Board proceedings. None have merit.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bryant & Stratton Business Institute, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    140 F.3d 169 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 24, 1998

    PARKER, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) seeks, on cross-petition, to enforce its orders entered August 23, 1996 (Chairman Gould, Members Browning and Cohen, Panel) and April 8, 1997 … Corp. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Proxy Communications of Manhattan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    873 F.2d 552 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 14, 1989

    PER CURIAM: We are asked to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) that arose from an employer’s claim that a majority of its employees no longer supports the union. … See, e.g., Richmond Recording Corp. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of Letters Rogatory Issued by the Director of Inspection of the Government of India to Take the Testimony of the President or Other Designated Representative of Messrs. Brown Brothers, Harriman & Company and the President or Other Designated Representative of Chase Manhattan Bank

    385 F.2d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 9, 1967

    This appeal by Jain and Brown Brothers, Harriman & Co. followed. 2 Although our appellate jurisdiction has not been questioned, we must consider this in the first instance. United States v. Fabric Garment Co. … Adityan v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Patty v. Helvering

    98 F.2d 717 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 18, 1938

    Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 , 55 S.Ct. 266 , 79 L.Ed. 596 , 97 A.L.R. 1355 . The courts have more commonly than not limited the section to such situations. Commissioner v. Brown, 7 Cir., 69 F.2d 602 ; Hyman v. … Randolph v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 76 F.2d 472 ; Brown v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 79 F.2d 73 ; McGuire v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 84 F.2d 431 ; Parker v. United States, 7 Cir., 88 F.2d 907 .

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.