Case law

Gray v. Board of Higher Education, City of New York

607 F.2d 995 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 7, 1979

607 F.2d 995 Gray v. … Board of Higher Education, City of New York No. 79-7116 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit 5/7/79 1 S.D.N.Y. 2 REMANDED * * Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would

Le-Rong Huang v. Board of Immigration Appeals

192 F. App'x 45 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 7, 2006

See, e.g., Twum v. INS, 411 F.3d 54, 58 (2d Cir.2005); Yu Sheng Zhang v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 362 F.3d 155, 158 (2d Cir.2004). … See Paul v.

Guang Zhong Li v. Board of Immigration Appeals

186 F. App'x 163 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 17, 2006

See, e.g., Chun Gao v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 122, 124 (2d Cir.2005); Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 305 (2d Cir.2003). This Court reviews de novo questions of law. Islami v. … Tian-Yong Chen v. INS, 359 F.3d 121, 130 (2d Cir.2004).

National Labor Relations Board v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Buffalo

936 F.2d 122 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 27, 1991

Grandee Beer Distributors, Inc. v. NLRB, 630 F.2d 928, 932 (2d Cir.1980) (citing Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951)). … In addition, it must be noted that the Board has broad discretion when passing on the appropriateness of disputed bargaining units. National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Weisman's Furniture and Appliances, Inc

455 F.2d 1406 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 6, 1971

P 12,385 National Labor Relations Board v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Newton Falls Paper Mill, Inc.

337 F.2d 622 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 29, 1964

337 F.2d 622 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. NEWTON FALLS PAPER MILL, INC., Respondent. No. 128, Docket 28968. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued Oct. 29, 1964. Decided Oct. 29, 1964. … PER CURIAM: 1 In open court we grant enforcement of the Board's order reported at 144 NLRB No. 144 (1963).

National Labor Relations Board v. New England Die Casting Co.

242 F.2d 759 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 28, 1957

Enforcement granted, for the reasons stated in the decision of the Board. 116 N.L.R.B. No. 1.

Murphy v. Board of Education of the Rochester City School District

106 F. App'x 746 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 28, 2004

See Lizardo v. Denny’s, Inc., 270 F.3d 94 , 103 (2d Cir.2001); Slattery v. Swiss Reinsurance Am. Corp., 248 F.3d 87, 94-95 (2d Cir.2001).

Tjie Men Euw v. Board of Immigration Appeals

221 F. App'x 11 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 7, 2007

Ai Feng Yuan v. DOJ, 416 F.3d 192, 198 (2d Cir.2005) (citing Ghaly v. … Tu Lin v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 395, 400 (2d Cir.2006).

Reinold v. United States

167 F.2d 556 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 29, 1948

In Crist v. … Co. v. Globe Ins.

New York University Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

156 F.3d 405 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 25, 1998

See Spentonbush, 106 F.3d at 492 (“the Board’s biased mishandling of cases involving supervisors increasingly has called into question our obeisance to the Board’s decisions in this area.”); Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. … See Meek v. United States, 608 F.2d 368, 373 (9th Cir.1979); see also Ezekiel v.

Zhu Ying Chen v. Board of Immigration Appeals

198 F. App'x 105 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 27, 2006

See, e.g., Borovikova v. U.S. … See Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 434 F.3d 144, 161 (2d Cir.2006).

Victor Sharrow v. George H. Brown, Census Bureau Director, Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20233

447 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 9, 1971

Massachusetts (Frothingham) v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447, 486-487 , 43 S.Ct. 597 , 67 L.Ed. 1078 (1923); Doremus v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 429, 433 , 72 S.Ct. 394 , 96 L.Ed. 475 (1952); cf. Flast v. … In Lampkin v.

Tian Ming Huang v. Board of Immigration Appeals

305 F. App'x 722 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 6, 2009

See Yan Chen v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). … See 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (b)(1)(B)®; Yueqing Zhang v.

Anderson v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.

89 F.2d 629 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 12, 1937

The case at bar presents a very different situation from that of grease on a handhold or ice on the running board, as in Ford v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 54 F.(2d) 342 (C.C.A.2). … Co. v. Brown, 63 F.(2d) 657 (C.C.A.6) certiorari denied 290 U.S. 634 , 54 S.Ct. 52 , 78 L.Ed. 551 ; Chicago, M., St. P. & Pac. R. Co. v. Goldhammer, 79 F.(2d) 272 (C.C. A.8), certiorari denied 296 U.S. 655 , 56 S.

Jia Quan Weng v. Board of Immigration Appeals

211 F. App'x 64 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 12, 2007

See Diallo v. … See Cheng Tong Wang v.

United States v. Edwards (Brown)

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 19, 2024

23-6139-cr United States v. … In United States v.

De Yan Chi v. Board of Immigration Appeals

193 F. App'x 80 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 15, 2006

See, e.g., Chun Gao v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 122, 124 (2d Cir.2005); Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 305 (2d Cir.2003). … See Majidi v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 77, 80-81 (2d Cir.2005).

National Labor Relations Board v. Eastern Connecticut Health Services, Inc.

815 F.2d 517 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 1987

Particularly since the Board is entitled to view such claims with skepticism when made by employers rather than employees, see Retired Persons Pharmacy v. … See NLRB v. Lee Office Equipment, 572 F.2d 704, 706-07 (9th Cir. 1978). The employer next makes several procedural attacks on the Board proceedings. None have merit.

Shi Wang Wang v. Board of Immigration Appeals

193 F. App'x 38 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 9, 2006

See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam); Jin Ming Liu v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 109, 111 (2d Cir.2006). … found where the BIA’s decision “provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or eonclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board