Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

7.47s

  • Aleta Chappelle v. Beacon Communications Corp., Beacon Films, Inc., Ghiznost Productions, Inc. And Gregory Brown

    84 F.3d 652 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 29, 1996

    United States v. … DuBose v.

    Cited 64 timesPublished
  • Shing Jiang Lui v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    237 F. App'x 647 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 27, 2007

    Twum v. INS, 411 F.3d 54, 58 (2d Cir.2005). … See Shou Yung Guo v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lian Ying Weng v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    209 F. App'x 62 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 19, 2006

    Xue Hong Yang v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 426 F.3d 520, 522 (2d Cir.2005). This Court reviews the agency’s factual findings under the substantial evidence standard. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B); Secaida-Rosales v. … See Paul v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 148, 156 (2d Cir.2006); Gomez v. INS, 947 F.2d 660, 665 (2d Cir.1991); cf. Xue Hong Yang, 426 F.3d at 523 . For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cheng Yang Lin v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    231 F. App'x 73 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 19, 2007

    Chun Yang Lin, a native and citizen of the Peo *74 pie’s Republic of China, seeks review of a February 25, 2004 decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an August 21, 2002 decision by Immigration Judge … See Shi Liang Lin v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 494 F.3d 296 , 2007 WL 2032066 (2d Cir.2007) (en banc). We have considered all petitioner’s claims and find them to be without merit.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Xu Zheng Shi v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    311 F. App'x 430 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 23, 2009

    See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). … Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 93 (2d Cir.2001) (internal citations omitted). Motions to reopen are “disfavored.” See Maghradze v. Gonzales, 462 F.3d 150, 154 (2d Cir.2006) (citing INS v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Xu Zheng Shi v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    311 F. App'x 430 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 23, 2009

    See Kaur v. BIA, 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). … Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 265 F.3d 83 , 93 (2d Cir.2001) (internal citations omitted). Motions to reopen are “disfavored.” See Maghradze v. Gonzales, 462 F.3d 150, 154 (2d Cir.2006) (citing INS v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Body & Tank Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    344 F.2d 330 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 21, 1965

    Enforcement of the order of the Board is denied and the order is set aside. American Ship Bldg. Co. v. NLRB, 85 S.Ct. 955 (March 29, 1965).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Igramo Enterprise, Inc.

    310 F. App'x 452 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 18, 2009

    “Our review of Board orders is quite limited.” N.L.R.B. v. Katz’s Delicatessen of Houston Street, Inc., 80 F.3d 755 , 763 (2d Cir.1996). … Cibao Meat Prod., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 547 F.3d 336, 339 (2d Cir.2008) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also id. (noting that “[o]ur review [of Board orders] is deferential” (internal quotation marks omitted)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yan Qing Cao v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    201 F. App'x 842 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 1, 2006

    See Kaur v. BIA 413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). … INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104-05 , 108 S.Ct. 904 , 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yi Teng Zheng v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    235 F. App'x 757 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 7, 2007

    Ming Xia Chen v. BIA, 435 F.3d 141, 144 (2d Cir.2006). … See Yun-Zui Guan v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 391, 394 (2d Cir.2005).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • A & P Brush Mfg. Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    140 F.3d 216 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 6, 1998

    The Board affirmed that determination. II. Discussion A. Standard of Review Whether Diversified is the alter ego of Brush is a question of fact. Southport Petroleum Co. v. … NLRB, 376 F.2d 684 (2d Cir.1967), and NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Harold FREEDMAN, Appellant

    445 F.2d 1220 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 6, 1971

    Freedman and Chesler then individually telephoned Elliot Hyman, Board Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Warner Bros. … In United States v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

    339 F.2d 116 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 20, 1964

    In the absence of a conflicting statutory command, the Board has broad powers to determine the exercise of its jurisdiction, N. L. R. B. v. … B. v. Joclin Manufacturing Company, supra.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Office & Professional Employees International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

    981 F.2d 76 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 10, 1992

    Brown & Root, Inc. v. NLRB, 634 F.2d 816, 818 (5th Cir.1981). … See also NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jin-Hui Jiang v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    353 F. App'x 601 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 18, 2009

    Ali v. Gonzales, 448 F.3d 515, 517 (2d Cir.2006). … See Jian Hui Shao, 546 F.3d at 169-72 (noting that “[w]e do not ourselves attempt to resolve conflicts in record evidence, a task largely within the discretion of the agency”); see also Wei Guang Wang v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Hudson T. Marsden, a Sole Proprietorship

    701 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 23, 1983

    That decision became the final decision and order of the Board on January 5, 1982. Relying upon N.L.R.B. v. … Relying on N.L.R.B. v. Washington Aluminum Co., supra, the Board held that the work stoppage by Marsden’s employees was a protected exercise of Section 7 rights.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hong Yun Qiu v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    204 F. App'x 912 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 6, 2006

    See, e.g., Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 307 (2d Cir.2003). … Cao He Lin v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 428 F.3d 391, 406 (2d Cir.2005); Tian-Yong Chen v. INS, 359 F.3d 121, 129 (2d Cir. 2004); see also Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chang Wang Lin v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    227 F. App'x 54 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 29, 2007

    Twum v. INS, 411 F.3d 54, 58 (2d Cir.2005). … See Ali v. Gonzales, 448 F.3d 515, 518 (2d Cir.2006). Because the BIA did not deny Lin's motion on this ground, we do not evaluate Lin's due diligence. See Zhi Wei Pang v. BCIS, 448 F.3d 102, 107 (2d Cir.2006)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cheng Le Dong v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    235 F. App'x 772 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 7, 2007

    See Yun-Zui Guan v. Gonzales, 432 F.3d 391, 394 (2d Cir.2005). We review de novo questions of law and the application of law to undisputed fact. See, e.g., Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 307 (2d Cir.2003). … See Xian Tuan Ye v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 446 F.3d 289, 295 (2d Cir.2006).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Caval Tool Division, Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corporation

    262 F.3d 184 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 21, 2001

    STANDARD OF REVIEW This court reviews the Board’s legal conclusions to ensure that they have a reasonable basis in law. In so doing, we afford the Board “a degree of legal leeway.” NLRB v. … The Board and the courts have followed this rationale in myriad analogous cases. See, e.g., NLRB v. Talsol Corp., 155 F.3d 785, 796-97 (6th Cir.1998); NLRB v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.