Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca2

10,000+ results

0.56s

  • Amalgamated Local Union 355 v. National Labor Relations Board

    481 F.2d 996 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 9, 1973

    B. v. Warrensburg Board & Paper Corp., 340 F.2d 920, 922 (C.A.2, 1965); accord, N. L. R. B. v. Marsellus Vault & Sales, Inc., 431 F.2d 933, 937 (C.A.2, 1970); N. L. R. B. v. … That much is now engrained in Board law. See, e. g. N. L. R. B. v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 , 612 n. 32, 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969); Lipman Motors, Inc. v. N. L. R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Xin Chen v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    126 F. App'x 528 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 28, 2005

    As to asylum, we review the factual findings of the BIA under the “substantial evidence” standard, Wu Biao Chen v. INS, 344 F.3d 272, 275 (2d Cir.2003) (per curiam), which is highly deferential, see Zhou Yun Zhang v. … Khouzam v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 161, 164 (2d Cir. 2004). Since the BIA adopted the conclusions of the IJ, we review the decision of the IJ as if it were that of the BIA. Yu Sheng Zhang v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Louis C. Ostrer

    597 F.2d 337 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 23, 1979

    This Court recently noted that disqualification motions should be granted *340 where the attorney in question is potentially in a position to use privileged information obtained during prior representation of the movant. 5 Board … of Education v.

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • Shufang Li v. Board of Immigration Appeals

    140 F. App'x 316 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 9, 2005

    See Secaida-Rosales v. INS, 331 F.3d 297, 307 (2d Cir.2003). Under the circumstances, we need not consider Li’s other claims, which do not undercut the basic finding that she was not credible. See Zhou Yun Zhang v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Montefiore Hospital & Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

    621 F.2d 510 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 28, 1980

    This interpretation of the statute’s language has been rejected by the Board and various courts which have addressed the matter, see NLRB v. Long Beach Youth Center, Inc., 591 F.2d 1276 (9th Cir. 1979); NLRB v. … The § 8(a)(4) charge was closely related to the charges already preferred, entitling the Board to expand its inquiry to include it. NLRB v. Jack LaLanne Mgmt. Corp., 539 F.2d 292, 294-95 (2d Cir. 1976); NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gina Gambino v. Fairfax County School Board

    564 F.2d 157 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 17, 1977

    Mercer v. Michigan State Board of Education (3-judge ct. E.D.Mich.1974) 379 F.Supp. 580 , aff'd, 419 U.S. 1081 , 95 S.Ct. 673 , 42 L.Ed.2d 678 . … Trachtman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hamilton Chapter Of Alpha Delta Phi, Inc. v. Hamilton College

    128 F.3d 59 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 10, 1997

    Brown University, 5 F.3d 658 (3d Cir.1993). … McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc., 444 U.S. 232, 242 , 100 S.Ct. 502, 509 , 62 L.Ed.2d 441 (1980).

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Yoonessi v. New York State Board for Professional Medical Conduct

    162 F. App'x 63 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 12, 2006

    That same month, the Medical Board of California (“MBC”) revoked plaintiffs license to practice medicine in California. … We review the District Court’s dismissal of the action de novo, see, e.g., Schick v. Berg, 430 F.3d 112, 115 (2d Cir. 2005) (grant of summary judgment reviewed de novo); United States v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Citrus Marketing Board Of Israel v. J. Lauritzen A/S

    943 F.2d 220 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 28, 1991

    Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 881 F.2d 761 , 766-67 (9th Cir.1989); Brown & Root, Inc. v. M/V Peisander, 648 F.2d 415, 425 (5th Cir.1981); Tessler Brothers (B.C.) Ltd. v. … . ----, 110 S.Ct. 56 , 107 L.Ed.2d 24, 25 (1989); Board of Educ. of City School Dist. v. Hufstedler, 641 F.2d 68, 70 (2d Cir.1981).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of New York

    622 F. App'x 19 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 17, 2015

    14-4450-cv Brown v. … Littlejohn v.

    Cited 37 timesUnpublished
  • Commercial Trust Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

    48 F.2d 113 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 9, 1931

    Yaselli v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (D. C.) 298 F. 198 ; Caceres v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (D. C.) 299 F. 968 . … Puget Sound, etc., v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (D. C.) 293 F. 768 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Conti v. Town of Warwick Zoning Board

    80 F. App'x 712 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 17, 2003

    See Spencer v. … See Jackson v. City of New York, 22 F.3d 71, 74-76 (2d Cir.1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • School Board of Parish of Livingston, Lousiana v. Louisiana State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education

    836 F.2d 1346 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 28, 1987

    Law Rep. 932 School Board of Parish of Livingston, Lousiana v. Louisiana State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education NO. 86-3470 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Variscite NY Four, LLC v. New York State Cannabis Control Board

    Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 12, 2025

    The Cannabis Law establishes the Cannabis 6 Control Board and Office of Cannabis Management (the entity 7 defendants here). See N.Y. … Power Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kowsh v. Board of Elections of City of New York

    99 F.3d 78 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 30, 1996

    Lecakes, Adela Garcia, Herbert Garcia, Elio Herman Ayazo, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, Vincent J. Vellella, Weyman A. Carey, Douglas A. Kellner, Ferdinand C. … See, e.g., Ryan v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Greene v. Brentwood Union Free School District

    576 F. App'x 39 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 21, 2014

    Tomassi v. Insignia Fin. Grp., Inc., 478 F.3d 111, 115 (2d Cir.2007). … Greene had notified the district of her intention to retire before the Board began the process for filling the position.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • New Power Wire & Electric Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    340 F.2d 71 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 7, 1965

    Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 366 U.S. 667, 677 , 81 S.Ct. 1285 , 6 L.Ed.2d 592 (1961); National Labor Relations Board v. Local 294, Int’l Brotherhood of Teamsters, 284 F.2d 887, 890 (2d Cir. 1960). … Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, supra, at 680; Seafarers Int’l Union v. National Labor Relations Board, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 211 , 265 F.2d 585 , 590 (1959).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Danielson v. Joint Board of Coat, Suit & Allied Garment Workers' Union

    494 F.2d 1230 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 27, 1974

    Douds v. … McLeod v. Business Machine & Office Appliance Mechanics Conference Board, supra, 300 F.2d at 239 ; McLeod v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Fuentes v. Board of Education of City of New York

    569 F.3d 46 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 15, 2009

    See Fuentes v. Bd. of Educ. of City of N.Y., 540 F.3d 145, 146-48 (2d Cir.2008). … Taylor v. Vermont Dep’t of Educ., 313 F.3d 768 , 782 (2d Cir.2002).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • B ex rel. M.B. v. East Granby Board of Education

    201 F. App'x 834 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 27, 2006

    Dist., Westchester County v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 207 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). As discussed above, plaintiffs’ argument that the Board erred in not relying on the expert evaluations is without merit. … See id. at 81 (‘We have repeatedly held that we apply the full [Hensley v.] Eckerhart procedure to IDEA fee awards.”); Hensley v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.