Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,466 results
0.65s
Florida Virtualschool v. K12, Inc.
773 F.3d 233 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Nov 17, 2014
The opinion of the Eleventh Circuit provides the relevant facts of the action filed by the Florida Virtual School against K12: Florida VirtualSchool was "established for the development and delivery of … The board of trustees shall be a public agency entitled to sovereign immunity pursuant to s. 768.28, and board members shall be public officers who shall bear fiduciary responsibility for the Florida Virtual
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States v. Robert Brandon Malone
51 F.4th 1311 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Oct 26, 2022
Others require us to faithfully apply well- established law. This case falls into the second camp. … Unlike the instant case, in Puckett there was a district court error at sentencing because the government’s breach was clearly before the district court.
Cited 30 timesPublishedEvans v. McClain of Georgia, Inc.
131 F.3d 957 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Dec 18, 1997
; and other equally or less qualified employees who were not members of the protected class were promoted. … While this motivation is clearly unlawful under the National Labor Relations Act, see McClain of Georgia, Inc., 322 N.L.R.B. 367 (1996), it in no way violates Title VII or § 1981.
Cited 71 timesPublishedAssociated Transport Line, Inc. v. Productos Fitosanitarios Proficol El Carmen, S.A.
197 F.3d 1070 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Dec 8, 1999
General jurisdiction has been found lacking even where a company had employees, agencies and salespeople regularly in the forum; where the company was qualified to do business in the forum; and where it regularly solicited … Clearly, Proficol's nine sales over four years is insufficient by these yardsticks.
Cited 20 timesPublishedUnited States v. Wali Ebbin Rashee Ross
941 F.3d 1058 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Oct 29, 2019
Stat. § 509.141(1), which states that “[t]he operator of any public lodging establishment . . . may remove . . . in the manner hereinafter provided, any guest of the establishment . . . who . . . fails to check out by the … The statute requires a hotel “operator [to] . . . notify such guest that the establishment no longer desires to entertain the guest and shall request that such guest immediately depart from the establishment”—if the guest
Cited 3 timesPublishedLakeland Health Care Associates, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
696 F.3d 1332 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Oct 2, 2012
On the issue of the LPNs’ authority, Lakeland argues that the record clearly establishes that the LPNs possess the authority to discipline, suspend, and effectively recommend the termination of the CNAs, and to assign and … Whether an individual qualifies as a "supervisor” under the Act does not necessarily rest on his or her employer’s ability to provide actual examples of disciplinary authority.
Cited 13 timesPublished874 F.2d 1534 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 13, 1989
Id. 8 The court found, with respect to the charges of untruthfulness and failure to obey an order, that Jones' disparate treatment claim also failed, because "[t]he evidence clearly shows that white officers charged with … This may be done by showing (i) that he belongs to a racial minority; (ii) that he applied and was qualified for a job for which the employer was seeking applicants; (iii) that, despite his qualifications, he was rejected
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 14, 1999
The district court determined that the evidence did not establish a high degree of interrelatedness between Galaxy Frame, DBG 95, Dr. … Summary judgment thus would have been appropriate only if there were no disputed issues of material fact – and, as the record in this case clearly demonstrates, this was not the case here.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States v. Matthew Bryan Caniff
916 F.3d 929 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Feb 15, 2019
. ----, 139 S.Ct. 854 , --- L.Ed.2d ----, 2019 WL 113506 (2019), established the following: St. … Detective Greene's challenged testimony may be ambiguous, but it clearly did not expressly address Caniff's mental state.
Cited 11 timesPublishedDonald Burns v. Town of Palm Beach
999 F.3d 1317 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 8, 2021
It is not limited -- as the majority suggests -- to public displays clearly related to the narrow issues of the day. … The constitutional protection is afforded to ‘speech,’ and acts that qualify as signs with expressive meaning qualify as speech within the meaning of the Constitution.”
Cited 33 timesPublishedWilfredo A. Zalaya v. Secretary, Florida department of Corrections
798 F.3d 1360 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Aug 24, 2015
The government asserted that Zelaya failed to qualify for relief under the savings clause. … Scott, 177 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 1999), which considered when a petitioner may rely on the savings clause.4 Zelaya clearly and repeatedly insisted that he be permitted to proceed under § 2241.
Overruled in part, on other grounds by Dan Carmichael McCarthan v. Director of Goodwill Industries-Suncoast, Inc., 851 F.3d 1076 (2017)Cited 31 timesPublishedAlabama v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
871 F.2d 1548 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 18, 1989
The legislative history behind this section supports rather than clearly contradicts this conclusion. … Section 310 is qualified by the phrase "Except as provided in ... section 9613(h) of this title (relating to timing of judicial review)_” .
Cited 31 timesPublishedA.I.G. Uruguay Compania De Seguros, S.A. v. AAA Cooper Transportation
334 F.3d 997 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 19, 2003
If the carrier cannot meet this burden, then liability is established. … We accepted in that sam e case a letter from a Singa pore A irlines em ployee th at “qualifies the equip ment sen t to Offshore as being in an unserviceable state.” Id. (internal q uotation s omitted ).
Cited 35 timesPublishedKyle Bosarge v. Mobile Area Water & Sewer Service
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jan 24, 2022
immunity. … Plaintiff did not identify the qualified immunity ruling in his opening brief as an issue for appeal, nor did he offer any substantive argument on the qualified immunity issue in his opening brief.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNorth Buckhead Civic Association v. Skinner
903 F.2d 1533 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 26, 1990
Then, before a draft of the EIS was written, studies were conducted, analyses done, pertinent data accumulated, and alternative means of attaining the established project goals were considered. … "When specialists express contrary views, an agency must have discretion to rely on the reasonable opinions of its own qualified experts even if, as an original matter, a court might find contrary views more persuasive."
Cited 9 timesPublishedUnited States v. 434.00 Acres of Land More or Less, in Camden County, State of Georgia
792 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 27, 1986
This conveyance gave to the United States “an easement and right for the establishment, maintenance, operation and use of a safety area, in connection with the Kings Bay Ammunition Loading Terminal” over parcels 33 and 34 … It may be reversed on appeal only if clearly erroneous. Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDarrell Cummings v. Matthew T. Whiddon
757 F.3d 1228 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jul 8, 2014
Rather, such a litigant acquiesces in and subjects himself to the established rules of practice and procedure. Birl v. Estelle, 660 F.2d 592, 593 (5th Cir. … SO ORDERED. 11 Cummings does not argue that the Magistrate Judge’s denial was based on a clearly erroneous factual finding.
Cited 53 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Aug 25, 2020
The remaining defendants then answered the complaint, denying any use of excessive force and claiming qualified immunity. … immunity.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAnn Mitchell v. City of Mobile
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Dec 4, 2018
The district court further concluded the officers were entitled to qualified immunity because it was not clearly established at the time of the shooting that their actions would violate the
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBernard Litman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
739 F.2d 1549 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Aug 27, 1984
However, the record clearly forecloses this challenge. … This evidence in the record clearly establishes a sufficient basis for the jury’s award of future damages. III.
Cited 34 timesPublished
Ask Donna