Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersca11

9,466 results

1.41s

  • 76 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1270, 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,369, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1284 Nancy Arrington v. Cobb County, Robert Hightower, in His Official Capacity as Director of Cobb County's Public Safety Commission, Nathan Wilson, in His Official Capacity as Fire Chief of Cobb County's Department of Fire and Emergency Service

    139 F.3d 865 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jul 1, 1998

    ) the Deputy Chief position went to an equally or less qualified person who was not a member of a protected class. … Gadsden State Community College, 908 F.2d 1512, 1518 (11th Cir.1990) (per curiam) 17 In granting summary judgment for appellees, the district court ruled that Arrington was sufficiently qualified to establish a prima facie

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Paul Eugene Owens v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, State of Florida

    698 F.2d 1111 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Feb 22, 1983

    While the court itself did not advise Owens of the minimum twenty-five years in prison, the findings of fact establish that Owens was aware of it. … They arranged to have a psychiatric examination of Owens to make certain he was competent to stand trial and did not qualify as a mentally disordered sex offender.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • United States v. Smith

    402 F.3d 1303 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Mar 18, 2005

    The rule in the qualified immunity context is that “[f]or a constitutional right to be clearly established, its contours must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates … This principle is well-established.

    Vacated on other grounds by United States v. Smith, 545 U.S. 1125 (2005)Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Fioretti v. Massachusetts General Life Insurance Company

    53 F.3d 1228 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 7, 1995

    This distinction clearly has little, if any, application in the present case. … Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., 710 F.2d 678, 690 (11th Cir.1983) 29 Although the record indicates that Anthony Fioretti paid all his premiums in accordance with the timetable established by the policy, it does not

    Cited 89 timesPublished
  • Steadham v. Sanders

    941 F.2d 1534 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Sep 18, 1991

    Clair, 384 So.2d 1 (Ala.1980) (county lacks governmental immunity, can sue and be sued). *1537 However, although we have searched Alabama law, we can find no indication that a county commission’s factual findings have preclusive … In the licensing case, the county commission takes administrative action for which it has essentially final authority, subject only to “a limited review, delineated by statute and court-established standards which relate

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Chan Walker Zielie, Keith H. Gustafson, Thomas David Wilkerson, Robert Walter Govern, and Leon D. Mausser

    734 F.2d 1447 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 25, 1984

    He asserted that none of the marijuana that he allegedly received and distributed had ever been seen, seized or tested by qualified law enforcement personnel or a qualified expert in the field of botany or forensic chemistry … There is no doubt that this circuit has a clearly established rule that convictions can be overturned where a comment on a defendant’s exercise of his right to remain silent impairs the integrity of that right.

    Abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Thomas Donald Chestang, A/K/A Donnie, and Roy H. Chestang, 849 F.2d 528 (1988)Cited 127 timesPublished
  • Scheurenbrand v. Wood Gundy Corp.

    8 F.3d 1547 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Oct 13, 1993

    This holding is consistent with the well-established, traditional understanding that rescission is an equitable remedy. See, e.g., Royal v. … Based upon this evidence, the trial court concluded in the memorandum accompanying its final order and judgment in this case that "[t]he evidence clearly established that plaintiffs still own the securities in question, and

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Holland v. Gee

    677 F.3d 1047 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 17, 2012

    Under McDonnell Douglas, the plaintiff must initially establish a prima facie case, which generally consists of the following: 1) the plaintiff was a member of a protected class, 2) she was qualified to do the job, 3) she … However, “the defendant must clearly set forth . . . the reasons for the plaintiff’s rejection.” Burdine, 450 U.S. at 255, 101 S. Ct. at 1094.

    Cited 207 timesPublished
  • Andrew Joyce v. Sheriff Robert Crowder

    509 F. App'x 969 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Feb 21, 2013

    Because the only issue we faced in the prior appeal was whether the arresting officers were entitled to qualified immunity from 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims alleging First and Fourth Amendment violations, and because all that … was required for qualified immunity was arguable probable cause, see, e.g., Jones v.

    Cited 3 timesUnpublished
  • Childers v. Floyd

    642 F.3d 953 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 2, 2011

    established federal law? … As explained in part III.A, supra, clearly established law says only that trial courts cannot bar all cross-examination into a witness’s possible biases.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Lawson v. Singletary

    85 F.3d 502 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 29, 1996

    immunity will bar any claim for damages. … There is clearly no per se bar to censorship of incoming prisoners' mail. See Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 U.S. 401, 109 S.Ct. 1874, 104 L.Ed.2d 459 (1989); Turner v.

    Overruled on other grounds by City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997)Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Jamie Senko v. Corey Jackson

    Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Mar 15, 2023

    Excessive Force Qualified immunity protects government officials perform- ing discretionary functions from trials and liability if their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … “[A] government official is entitled to qualified immunity unless he (1) violated a con- stitutional right, and (2) that constitutional right was clearly estab- lished at the time.” Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Ramon Badillo v. Janet Thorpe

    158 F. App'x 208 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Dec 1, 2005

    No other courts may be established by the state, any political subdivision or any municipality. … “To state a claim under Title II of the ADA, a plaintiff must allege: (1) that he is a qualified individual with a disability; (2) that he was excluded from participation in or . . . denied the benefits of the services,

    Cited 85 timesUnpublished
  • Thigpen v. Bibb County, Georgia

    223 F.3d 1231 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Aug 30, 2000

    Plaintiffs argue that the Reeves Decree qualifies as such an "on-going policy" and that, consequently, Beavers controls. Because we conclude that Beavers is distinguishable, we disagree. … NOTES: 1 "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process

    Abrogated on other grounds by National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101 (2002)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United States v. Barrington

    648 F.3d 1178 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Aug 11, 2011

    The Government could accordingly introduce qualifying 404(b) extrinsic act evidence to prove intent. Id. And because he raised the “mere presence” defense, qualifying extrinsic act evidence became “highly probative.” … Testimony established that grades were changed to enhance students’ GPAs and qualify them for the next step in their respective academic progressions, including graduate school.

    Cited 357 timesPublished
  • Ann McCauley v. State of Georgia

    466 F. App'x 832 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 12, 2012

    Because McCauley could not establish an ADA violation, the Bibb County court and Judge Self were immune from money damages under the Eleventh Amendment, and the magistrate recommended dismissing McCauley’s claim for money … The Court did not qualify this holding with a requirement that an actual violation must have occurred for the abrogation of immunity to be valid. See generally id.

    Cited 4 timesUnpublished
  • Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc. v. United States

    743 F.2d 781 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Oct 3, 1984

    In its advertising contracts, the Free Press provided that an advertiser would qualify for a lower per line rate if its annual volume of advertising exceeded a specified level. … life for each such asset guideline class ..; (c) For each asset guideline class ..., (1) the total unadjusted basis of all qualified property, (2) the aggregate of the reserves for depreciation of all accounts in the asset

    Cited 110 timesPublished
  • Grant Danskine v. Miami Dade Fire Department

    253 F.3d 1288 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 12, 2001

    But Appellants’ physical ability data does not establish that the affirmative action plan was unjustified in 1994-97. … to be firefighters, or that only a tiny percentage of women are physically qualified.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Grant Danskine v. Miami Dade Fire Department

    253 F.3d 1288 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 12, 2001

    But Appellants' physical ability data does not establish that the affirmative action plan was unjustified in 1994-97. … to be firefighters, or that only a tiny percentage of women are physically qualified.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Janice Akins v. Fulton County, Georgia

    278 F. App'x 964 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 22, 2008

    . § 1983 against Defendants John Gates, Vanessa Reynolds, and Fulton County, Georgia.1 In our previous opinion, we reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment, on the basis of qualified immunity, to defendant … established law.

    Cited 15 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.