Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.69s
Dallas Title & Guaranty Co. v. Commissioner
40 B.T.A. 1022 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 6, 1939
Bowers v. Lawyers’ Mortgage Co., 285 U. S. 182 ; Lincoln Mortgage & Title Guaranty Co. v. Commissioner, 79 Fed. (2d) 585; Empire Title & Guarantee Co. v. United States, 101 Fed. (2d) 69. … United States v. Scott & Sons, Inc., 69 Fed. (2d) 728. Estate of William Steele, 34 B. T. A. 173, and cases there cited. On the issue of estoppel we hold in favor of the petitioner. Reviewed by the Board.
Reversed on other grounds by Commissioner v. Dallas Title & Guaranty Co., 119 F.2d 211 (1941)Cited 8 timesPublishedBen Ginsburg Co. v. Commissioner
19 B.T.A. 81 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 27, 1930
BEN GINSBURG CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Ben Ginsburg Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 45556. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 19 B.T.A. 81 ; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2470 ; February 27, 1930 , Promulgated *2470 Affiliated corporations filing a consolidated return under the provisions of the Revenue Act of 1926 are entitled
Cited 3 timesPublishedColumbus Canning Co. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 1085 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 29, 1928
Whitewater Tile & Pressed Brick Co. v. Baker, 142 Wis. 420 ; 125 N. W. 984 ; Knutson Hardware Co., 5 B. T. A. 9. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered on W days’ notice, under Rule 50. MuRdock concurs in the result.
Cited 0 timesPublished35 B.T.A. 183 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 17, 1936
Helvering v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 296 U. S. 39 . … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Bule 50.
Cited 2 timesPublished6 B.T.A. 70 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 7, 1927
MELICK, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Melick v. Commissioner Docket No. 7623. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 6 B.T.A. 70 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3603 ; February 7, 1927 , Promulgated *3603 The stock in a bank owned by the petitioner was worthless at the end of 1921 and the cost thereof was a proper deduction
Cited 0 timesPublishedSullivan Granite Constr. Co. v. Commissioner
6 B.T.A. 703 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 2, 1927
SULLIVAN GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Sullivan Granite Constr. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 8790. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 6 B.T.A. 703 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3437 ; April 2, 1927 , Promulgated *3437 Samuel Freedman, C.P.A., for the petitioner. C. H. Curl, Esq., for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublished45 B.T.A. 948 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 9, 1941
Paine); or where the beneficiaries had no more than contingent interests, dependent upon the trustee’s discretion (Helvering v. Blair and Commissioner v. Taylor). … The court remanded the proceeding to the Board “on the issue whether the beneficiaries took future interests in property.”
Cited 1 timesPublishedCitron-Byer Co. v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 308 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 12, 1930
CITRON-BYER CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Citron-Byer Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 37853. … It is agreed that in the event the Board decides in favor of the petitioner the amount of the deficiency or overpayment may be settled under Rule 50. 3.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSelwyn Eddy Co. v. Commissioner
25 B.T.A. 1341 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 29, 1932
SELWYN EDDY COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Selwyn Eddy Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 21612. … and the date of final decision by said Board.
Cited 1 timesPublished1 B.T.A. 796 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 17, 1925
Long v. Commissioner Docket No. 409. … From the evidence introduced at the hearing the Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStange-Elliott Coal Co. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 745 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 4, 1926
Stange-Elliott Coal Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 5745. United States Board of Tax Appeals 4 B.T.A. 745 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2219 ; August 4, 1926 , Decided *2219 1. … The Board is without jurisdiction to redetermine overassessment for a year in which no deficiency has been asserted. 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSioux City Stock Yards Co. v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 973 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 30, 1930
Dry Goods Co. v. United States, 280 U. S. 453 . … Gauley Mountain Coal Co. v. Commissioner, 23 Fed. (2d) 574.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLaw & Credit Co. v. Commissioner
5 B.T.A. 57 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 13, 1926
Law & Credit Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 508. United States Board of Tax Appeals 5 B.T.A. 57 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 1990 ; October 13, 1926 . Decided *1990 1. … LANSDON: The only questions remaining for the Board to determine are as to the salaries allowable under the law to Ernest E. and Elbert E.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGeneral Utilities & Operating Co. v. Commissioner
27 B.T.A. 1200 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 24, 1933
We held: The petitioner, by resolution of its board of directors, of October 17, 1922, only incurred an obligation to distribute the 9,000 shares of Amalgamated Sugar Co. stock to its stockholders, which obligation it fully … In State v. B. & O. R.
Cited 0 timesPublished9 B.T.A. 486 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 6, 1927
American Net & Twine Co. v. Worthington, 141 U. S. 468, 474 ; Benziger v. United States, 192 U. S. 38, 55; Gould v. Gould, 245 U. S. 151 . … Shwab v. Doyle, 269 Fed. 321 ; Rea v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedRosenbaum Bros., Inc. v. Commissioner
11 B.T.A. 736 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 20, 1928
ROSENBAUM BROTHERS, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Rosenbaum Bros., Inc. v. Commissioner Docket No. 13050. … . *740 This Board has several times been called upon to pass upon similar questions.
Cited 3 timesPublished29 B.T.A. 450 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 24, 1933
In Howbert v. Penrose, 38 Fed. (2d) 577, the court quoted with approval from Towne v. … De Ganay v. Lederer, 250 U.S. 376 , 39 S.Ct. 524 , 63 L.Ed. 1042; Cummings v. Clark, 2 F. (2d) 442 (C.C.A. 3) ; Towne v. McElligott, supra. The decision of the Supreme Court in De Ganay v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedChampion Coated Paper Co. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 433 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 1, 1928
Provision is made for the approval by the court of the appraisals made of benefits, and the board of directors is thereupon empowered to levy assessments upon the real property not in excess of the appraised benefits to such … In the case of Miami County v. Dayton, 92 Ohio State 215 ; 110 N.
Cited 3 timesPublished26 B.T.A. 731 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 27, 1932
VALENTINE BLISS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Bliss v. Commissioner Docket No. 53422. … The respondent cites no authority either of the Board or the courts *1272 to support his contention.
Cited 2 timesPublished18 B.T.A. 1230 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 18, 1930
HARRY EKDAHL, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Ekdahl v. Commissioner Docket No. 24271. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the petitioner. MARQUETTE dissents.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna