Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

2.69s

  • Dallas Title & Guaranty Co. v. Commissioner

    40 B.T.A. 1022 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 6, 1939

    Bowers v. Lawyers’ Mortgage Co., 285 U. S. 182 ; Lincoln Mortgage & Title Guaranty Co. v. Commissioner, 79 Fed. (2d) 585; Empire Title & Guarantee Co. v. United States, 101 Fed. (2d) 69. … United States v. Scott & Sons, Inc., 69 Fed. (2d) 728. Estate of William Steele, 34 B. T. A. 173, and cases there cited. On the issue of estoppel we hold in favor of the petitioner. Reviewed by the Board.

    Reversed on other grounds by Commissioner v. Dallas Title & Guaranty Co., 119 F.2d 211 (1941)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ben Ginsburg Co. v. Commissioner

    19 B.T.A. 81 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 27, 1930

    BEN GINSBURG CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Ben Ginsburg Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 45556. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 19 B.T.A. 81 ; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2470 ; February 27, 1930 , Promulgated *2470 Affiliated corporations filing a consolidated return under the provisions of the Revenue Act of 1926 are entitled

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Columbus Canning Co. v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 1085 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 29, 1928

    Whitewater Tile & Pressed Brick Co. v. Baker, 142 Wis. 420 ; 125 N. W. 984 ; Knutson Hardware Co., 5 B. T. A. 9. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered on W days’ notice, under Rule 50. MuRdock concurs in the result.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schneider v. Commissioner

    35 B.T.A. 183 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 17, 1936

    Helvering v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 296 U. S. 39 . … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Bule 50.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Melick v. Commissioner

    6 B.T.A. 70 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 7, 1927

    MELICK, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Melick v. Commissioner Docket No. 7623. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 6 B.T.A. 70 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3603 ; February 7, 1927 , Promulgated *3603 The stock in a bank owned by the petitioner was worthless at the end of 1921 and the cost thereof was a proper deduction

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sullivan Granite Constr. Co. v. Commissioner

    6 B.T.A. 703 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 2, 1927

    SULLIVAN GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Sullivan Granite Constr. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 8790. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 6 B.T.A. 703 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3437 ; April 2, 1927 , Promulgated *3437 Samuel Freedman, C.P.A., for the petitioner. C. H. Curl, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Commissioner

    45 B.T.A. 948 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 9, 1941

    Paine); or where the beneficiaries had no more than contingent interests, dependent upon the trustee’s discretion (Helvering v. Blair and Commissioner v. Taylor). … The court remanded the proceeding to the Board “on the issue whether the beneficiaries took future interests in property.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Citron-Byer Co. v. Commissioner

    21 B.T.A. 308 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 12, 1930

    CITRON-BYER CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Citron-Byer Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 37853. … It is agreed that in the event the Board decides in favor of the petitioner the amount of the deficiency or overpayment may be settled under Rule 50. 3.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Selwyn Eddy Co. v. Commissioner

    25 B.T.A. 1341 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 29, 1932

    SELWYN EDDY COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Selwyn Eddy Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 21612. … and the date of final decision by said Board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Long v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 796 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 17, 1925

    Long v. Commissioner Docket No. 409. … From the evidence introduced at the hearing the Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stange-Elliott Coal Co. v. Commissioner

    4 B.T.A. 745 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 4, 1926

    Stange-Elliott Coal Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 5745. United States Board of Tax Appeals 4 B.T.A. 745 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2219 ; August 4, 1926 , Decided *2219 1. … The Board is without jurisdiction to redetermine overassessment for a year in which no deficiency has been asserted. 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sioux City Stock Yards Co. v. Commissioner

    21 B.T.A. 973 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 30, 1930

    Dry Goods Co. v. United States, 280 U. S. 453 . … Gauley Mountain Coal Co. v. Commissioner, 23 Fed. (2d) 574.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Law & Credit Co. v. Commissioner

    5 B.T.A. 57 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 13, 1926

    Law & Credit Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 508. United States Board of Tax Appeals 5 B.T.A. 57 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 1990 ; October 13, 1926 . Decided *1990 1. … LANSDON: The only questions remaining for the Board to determine are as to the salaries allowable under the law to Ernest E. and Elbert E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 1200 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 24, 1933

    We held: The petitioner, by resolution of its board of directors, of October 17, 1922, only incurred an obligation to distribute the 9,000 shares of Amalgamated Sugar Co. stock to its stockholders, which obligation it fully … In State v. B. & O. R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stein v. Commissioner

    9 B.T.A. 486 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 6, 1927

    American Net & Twine Co. v. Worthington, 141 U. S. 468, 474 ; Benziger v. United States, 192 U. S. 38, 55; Gould v. Gould, 245 U. S. 151 . … Shwab v. Doyle, 269 Fed. 321 ; Rea v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rosenbaum Bros., Inc. v. Commissioner

    11 B.T.A. 736 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 20, 1928

    ROSENBAUM BROTHERS, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Rosenbaum Bros., Inc. v. Commissioner Docket No. 13050. … . *740 This Board has several times been called upon to pass upon similar questions.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Neville v. Commissioner

    29 B.T.A. 450 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 24, 1933

    In Howbert v. Penrose, 38 Fed. (2d) 577, the court quoted with approval from Towne v. … De Ganay v. Lederer, 250 U.S. 376 , 39 S.Ct. 524 , 63 L.Ed. 1042; Cummings v. Clark, 2 F. (2d) 442 (C.C.A. 3) ; Towne v. McElligott, supra. The decision of the Supreme Court in De Ganay v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Champion Coated Paper Co. v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 433 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 1, 1928

    Provision is made for the approval by the court of the appraisals made of benefits, and the board of directors is thereupon empowered to levy assessments upon the real property not in excess of the appraised benefits to such … In the case of Miami County v. Dayton, 92 Ohio State 215 ; 110 N.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bliss v. Commissioner

    26 B.T.A. 731 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 27, 1932

    VALENTINE BLISS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Bliss v. Commissioner Docket No. 53422. … The respondent cites no authority either of the Board or the courts *1272 to support his contention.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ekdahl v. Commissioner

    18 B.T.A. 1230 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 18, 1930

    HARRY EKDAHL, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Ekdahl v. Commissioner Docket No. 24271. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the petitioner. MARQUETTE dissents.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.