Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.13s
Wyoming Tie & Lumber Co. v. Commissioner
9 B.T.A. 1143 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 11, 1928
WYOMING TIE & TIMBER CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Wyoming Tie & Lumber Co. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 21370, 24574. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublished15 B.T.A. 1213 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 2, 1929
LEE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Lee v. Commissioner Docket No. 16307. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 15 B.T.A. 1213 ; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2703 ; April 2, 1929 , Promulgated *2703 Petitioner in 1919 paid $11,300 for stock in a corporation which, in October, 1920, decided to liquidate and in that
Cited 1 timesPublished5 B.T.A. 225 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 27, 1926
Smith v. Commissioner Docket No. 3782. … . *228 We are, however, of the opinion that the Board has jurisdiction to determine the taxpayer's liability for the year 1918.
Cited 1 timesPublished24 B.T.A. 130 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 24, 1931
MARIAN STEWART HONEYMAN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Honeyman v. Commissioner Docket No. 27792. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHub Clothing House, Ltd. v. Commissioner
39 B.T.A. 900 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 18, 1939
HUB CLOTHING HOUSE, LTD., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Hub Clothing House, Ltd. v. Commissioner Docket No. 94426. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 39 B.T.A. 900 ; 1939 BTA LEXIS 959 ; May 18, 1939 , Promulgated *959 CREDIT UNDER SEC. 26:c):2), REVENUE ACT OF 1936. - None allowed where contract to purchase real estate provided that
Cited 1 timesPublished35 B.T.A. 764 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 30, 1937
Matchette v. Helvering, 81 Fed. (2d) 73. … [Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50. SEC. 233. ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTIONS AND CREDITS.
Cited 6 timesPublished10 B.T.A. 637 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 10, 1928
BAHR, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Bahr v. Commissioner Docket No. 5020. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50. STERNHAGEN and MURDOCK dissent. TRAMMELL dissents in part.
Cited 3 timesPublished47 B.T.A. 607 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 21, 1942
A. 112; Higgins v. Smith, 308 U. S. 473 ; S. A. MacQueen Co. v. Commissioner, 67 Fed. (2d) 857; Shoenberg v. Commissioner, 77 Fed. (2d) 446; Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U. S. 465 ; Griffiths v. Commissioner, 308 U. … Commissioner v. Branch, 114 Fed. (2d) 985; Jones v. Norris, 122 Fed. (2d) 6.
Cited 5 timesPublished27 B.T.A. 33 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 9, 1932
This principle is so familiar that citation or discussion of the many decisions of this Board and of the courts in which it is reiterated is unnecessary. … Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co., 113 Texas 160 ; Texas Co. v. Daugherty, 107 Texas, 226 ; Waggoner Estate v. Wichita County, 273 U. S. 113 .
Cited 0 timesPublished27 B.T.A. 120 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 23, 1932
In re Quality Shoe Shop, Inc., 212 Fed. 321 ; Hinkley v. Sagemiller, 210 N.W. (Wis.) 839, 841; Myers, Inc. v. Ogden Shoe Co., 181 N. W. (Wis.) 307; Pratt v. Oshkosh Match Co., 89 Wis. 406 ; 72 N. … See also Whitney v. Wyman, 101 U.
Cited 0 timesPublished40 B.T.A. 274 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 25, 1939
The analogy is not apparent to the Board. The respondent contends that the deduction is expressly denied by section 24 (a) (4). … A. 910; affd., 84 Fed. (2d) 310; Rieck v. Heiner, 25 Fed. (2d) 453; certiorari denied, 277 TJ. S. 608. See also Benjamin Barron, 14 B. T. A. 1022. Cf. Joseph Nussbaum, 19 B. T. A. 868.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSheridan Meat Co. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 211 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 25, 1928
SHERIDAN MEAT CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Sheridan Meat Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 5493. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioner.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGeorge M. Cox, Inc. v. Commissioner
44 B.T.A. 1232 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 12, 1941
COX, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. George M. Cox, Inc. v. Commissioner Docket No. 101847. … The Board adopts as its findings of fact the stipulation of the parties.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPhilad Co. of Delaware v. Commissioner
47 B.T.A. 565 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 19, 1942
THE PHILAD COMPANY OF DELAWARE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Philad Co. of Delaware v. Commissioner Docket No. 106896. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 47 B.T.A. 565 ; 1942 BTA LEXIS 676 ; August 19, 1942 , Promulgated *676 1.
Cited 1 timesPublished20 B.T.A. 799 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 12, 1930
ROLLO, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. EDWARD N. WILEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. C. MARSHALL ROGERS, PETITIONER, v. … MAGILL, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Rollo v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 22477, 22482, 22484, 22485.
Cited 0 timesPublished20 B.T.A. 1068 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 30, 1930
the date of final decision by said Board. … Law v.
Cited 7 timesPublished28 B.T.A. 13 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 4, 1933
The rule as stated in Houser v. … Ellis, 25 B.T.A. 1195 ; Corliss v. Bowers, 281 U.S. 376 . Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered for the respondent.
Cited 3 timesPublished10 B.T.A. 1166 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 5, 1928
PRICE, ADMINISTRATOR, ESTATE OF THOMAS LAWRENCE PRICE, PETITIONER, v. . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Price v. Commissioner Docket No. 21695. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 10 B.T.A. 1166 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3947 ; March 5, 1928 , Promulgated *3947 Deficiency held barred from assessment. Theodore B. Benson, Esq., for the petitioner. A. S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHennepin Holding Co. v. Commissioner
23 B.T.A. 119 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 8, 1931
Alameda Investment Co. v. McLaughlin, 3 3 Fed. (2d) 120; Bowie Lumber Co., Ltd., 20 B. T. A. 342; Imperial Assurance Co., 19 B. T. A. 1068; Harbour-Longmire Co., 18 B. T. A. 33. As to 1924 a different condition exists. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered fu/rsuant to Rule 50. MttepocK dissents.
Cited 1 timesPublished7 B.T.A. 1292 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 7, 1927
Fleming v. Commis sioner, 6 B. T. A. 900, and Baltzell v. Mitchell, 3 Fed. (2d) 428. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna