Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

1.13s

  • Wyoming Tie & Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

    9 B.T.A. 1143 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 11, 1928

    WYOMING TIE & TIMBER CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Wyoming Tie & Lumber Co. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 21370, 24574. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Commissioner

    15 B.T.A. 1213 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 2, 1929

    LEE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Lee v. Commissioner Docket No. 16307. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 15 B.T.A. 1213 ; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2703 ; April 2, 1929 , Promulgated *2703 Petitioner in 1919 paid $11,300 for stock in a corporation which, in October, 1920, decided to liquidate and in that

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Commissioner

    5 B.T.A. 225 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 27, 1926

    Smith v. Commissioner Docket No. 3782. … . *228 We are, however, of the opinion that the Board has jurisdiction to determine the taxpayer's liability for the year 1918.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Honeyman v. Commissioner

    24 B.T.A. 130 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 24, 1931

    MARIAN STEWART HONEYMAN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Honeyman v. Commissioner Docket No. 27792. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hub Clothing House, Ltd. v. Commissioner

    39 B.T.A. 900 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 18, 1939

    HUB CLOTHING HOUSE, LTD., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Hub Clothing House, Ltd. v. Commissioner Docket No. 94426. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 39 B.T.A. 900 ; 1939 BTA LEXIS 959 ; May 18, 1939 , Promulgated *959 CREDIT UNDER SEC. 26:c):2), REVENUE ACT OF 1936. - None allowed where contract to purchase real estate provided that

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gladstone Co. v. Commissioner

    35 B.T.A. 764 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 30, 1937

    Matchette v. Helvering, 81 Fed. (2d) 73. … [Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50. SEC. 233. ALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTIONS AND CREDITS.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bahr v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 637 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 10, 1928

    BAHR, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Bahr v. Commissioner Docket No. 5020. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50. STERNHAGEN and MURDOCK dissent. TRAMMELL dissents in part.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Potter v. Commissioner

    47 B.T.A. 607 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 21, 1942

    A. 112; Higgins v. Smith, 308 U. S. 473 ; S. A. MacQueen Co. v. Commissioner, 67 Fed. (2d) 857; Shoenberg v. Commissioner, 77 Fed. (2d) 446; Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U. S. 465 ; Griffiths v. Commissioner, 308 U. … Commissioner v. Branch, 114 Fed. (2d) 985; Jones v. Norris, 122 Fed. (2d) 6.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Nail v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 33 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 9, 1932

    This principle is so familiar that citation or discussion of the many decisions of this Board and of the courts in which it is reiterated is unnecessary. … Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co., 113 Texas 160 ; Texas Co. v. Daugherty, 107 Texas, 226 ; Waggoner Estate v. Wichita County, 273 U. S. 113 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Perfex Corp. v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 120 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 23, 1932

    In re Quality Shoe Shop, Inc., 212 Fed. 321 ; Hinkley v. Sagemiller, 210 N.W. (Wis.) 839, 841; Myers, Inc. v. Ogden Shoe Co., 181 N. W. (Wis.) 307; Pratt v. Oshkosh Match Co., 89 Wis. 406 ; 72 N. … See also Whitney v. Wyman, 101 U.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • JEFERSON v. COMMISSIONER

    40 B.T.A. 274 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 25, 1939

    The analogy is not apparent to the Board. The respondent contends that the deduction is expressly denied by section 24 (a) (4). … A. 910; affd., 84 Fed. (2d) 310; Rieck v. Heiner, 25 Fed. (2d) 453; certiorari denied, 277 TJ. S. 608. See also Benjamin Barron, 14 B. T. A. 1022. Cf. Joseph Nussbaum, 19 B. T. A. 868.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sheridan Meat Co. v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 211 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 25, 1928

    SHERIDAN MEAT CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Sheridan Meat Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 5493. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioner.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • George M. Cox, Inc. v. Commissioner

    44 B.T.A. 1232 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 12, 1941

    COX, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. George M. Cox, Inc. v. Commissioner Docket No. 101847. … The Board adopts as its findings of fact the stipulation of the parties.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Philad Co. of Delaware v. Commissioner

    47 B.T.A. 565 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 19, 1942

    THE PHILAD COMPANY OF DELAWARE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Philad Co. of Delaware v. Commissioner Docket No. 106896. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 47 B.T.A. 565 ; 1942 BTA LEXIS 676 ; August 19, 1942 , Promulgated *676 1.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rollo v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 799 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 12, 1930

    ROLLO, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. EDWARD N. WILEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. C. MARSHALL ROGERS, PETITIONER, v. … MAGILL, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Rollo v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 22477, 22482, 22484, 22485.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gillespie v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 1068 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 30, 1930

    the date of final decision by said Board. … Law v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Primm v. Commissioner

    28 B.T.A. 13 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 4, 1933

    The rule as stated in Houser v. … Ellis, 25 B.T.A. 1195 ; Corliss v. Bowers, 281 U.S. 376 . Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered for the respondent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Price v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 1166 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 5, 1928

    PRICE, ADMINISTRATOR, ESTATE OF THOMAS LAWRENCE PRICE, PETITIONER, v. . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Price v. Commissioner Docket No. 21695. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 10 B.T.A. 1166 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3947 ; March 5, 1928 , Promulgated *3947 Deficiency held barred from assessment. Theodore B. Benson, Esq., for the petitioner. A. S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hennepin Holding Co. v. Commissioner

    23 B.T.A. 119 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 8, 1931

    Alameda Investment Co. v. McLaughlin, 3 3 Fed. (2d) 120; Bowie Lumber Co., Ltd., 20 B. T. A. 342; Imperial Assurance Co., 19 B. T. A. 1068; Harbour-Longmire Co., 18 B. T. A. 33. As to 1924 a different condition exists. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered fu/rsuant to Rule 50. MttepocK dissents.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Warner v. Commissioner

    7 B.T.A. 1292 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 7, 1927

    Fleming v. Commis sioner, 6 B. T. A. 900, and Baltzell v. Mitchell, 3 Fed. (2d) 428. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.