Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.72s
Archer-Strauss Rubber Co. v. Commissioner
9 B.T.A. 809 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 22, 1927
ARCHER-STRAUSS RUBBER CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Archer-Strauss Rubber Co. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 17194, 25188. … There is no question before the Board as to the correctness of the rates used by the respondent in computing depreciation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGeneral Utilities & Operating Co. v. Commissioner
29 B.T.A. 934 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 30, 1934
In State v. B. & O. … In either case, it is to be taken as it emanates from the board. A part of it cannot■ be taken and the rest discarded.
Cited 0 timesPublished44 Ohio Law. Abs. 419 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 20, 1945
See, also, Broeck v. Jersey City, 44 N. J. Law 156; Radebaugh v. … State ex rel., Struble v Davis, 132 Oh St 555.
Cited 0 timesPublished7 B.T.A. 636 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 13, 1927
WIRT FRANKLIN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Franklin v. Commissioner Docket No. 9266. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the petitioner.
Cited 5 timesPublished11 B.T.A. 903 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 1, 1928
A portion of the assessment was abated but no proceeding for the collection of the tax has been instituted and under the decision in Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co., 273 U. … therefrom, the time for assessment would be further extended until the final decision by the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished16 B.T.A. 847 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 31, 1929
HAND, ATTORNEY IN FACT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. MCUNT v. COMMISSIONER Docket No. 21627. … The following parcels were also conveyed by the deed aforesaid, they "being the same property conveyed to Susan Mount in an action in partition, Susan Mount v. Charlotte A. Mount, et al, * * *." Parcel 20 N.
Cited 0 timesPublished5 B.T.A. 1181 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 26, 1927
BIXLER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Bixler v. Commissioner Docket No. 936. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 5 B.T.A. 1181 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3651 ; January 26, 1927 , Promulgated *3651 The facts in this proceeding fail to establish that amounts expended for railroad fare, meals, lodging, and laundry
Cited 101 timesPublishedWestern Md. Ry. Co. v. Commissioner
12 B.T.A. 889 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 27, 1928
In State v. … See Commissioner of Internal Revenue v.
Cited 0 timesPublished34 B.T.A. 173 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 20, 1936
STEELE, TRUSTEE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Steele v. Commissioner Docket No. 73347. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the petitioner.
Cited 6 timesPublished4 B.T.A. 1077 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 27, 1926
Hunt v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 6275, 6274. United States Board of Tax Appeals 4 B.T.A. 1077 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2069 ; September 27, 1926 , Decided *2069 S. T. Hunt for the petitioners. A. J. … He now wants the Board to hold that his determinations on the basis of separate returns were improper and that the deficiency against the husband should be increased by attributing to him all the income.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMagnolia Window Glass Co. v. Commissioner
23 B.T.A. 1242 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 24, 1931
MAGNOLIA WINDOW GLASS COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Magnolia Window Glass Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 21773. … On August 3, 1925, the board of directors of the Model Window Glass Company passed the following resolution: Be it remembered that on this the 3rd day of August 1925, a special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Model
Cited 0 timesPublishedA--C Inv. Asso. v. Commissioner
24 B.T.A. 582 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 4, 1931
See United States v. Cambridge Loan & Building Co., 278 U. S. 255 . In the case of National Bank of Redemption v. Boston, 125 U. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 4 timesPublished41 B.T.A. 515 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 5, 1940
Reviewed by the Board. Decisions will be entered wnder Bule 50. Mellott dissents. … Tuller v. Superior Court, 10 Pac. (2d) 43 (Cal.) ; Janes v. Edwards, 41 Pac. (2d) 370 (Cal.) ; 20 California Jurisprudence 416; Gamble v. Leva, 102 So. 120 (Ala.).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHiggins Estate v. Commissioner
30 B.T.A. 814 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 31, 1934
In Burnet v. … Reviewed by the Board. Deoision will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublished8 B.T.A. 1 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 9, 1927
The parties have agreed that the facts are in terms the same as those found by the Board in the earlier report. … La Belle Iron Works v. United States, 256 U. S. 377 ; 3 Am. Fed. Tax Rep. 3113.
Cited 2 timesPublished24 B.T.A. 1107 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 8, 1931
A. 150, we concluded, after a review of numerous cases of both the Board and the courts dealing with questions such as the one before us in this proceeding, that the real tests to be applied in determining whether a particular … Merle-Smith v. Commissioner, 42 Fed. (2d) 837; Mary Alphin et al., 21 B. T. A. 1101; and Ida L. Kuhn et al., 24 B. T. A. 216. Decisions will be entered for the petitioners.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Contracting Corp. v. Commissioner
35 B.T.A. 232 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 8, 1937
JONES, INC., ASSIGNEE OF AND SUCCESSOR TO OKLAHOMA CONTRACTING CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Oklahoma Contracting Corp. v. Commissioner Docket No. 77871. … Corner-Broadway-Maiden Lane v. Commissioner, 76 Fed.(2d) 106 ; American Gas & Electric Securities Corporation, 33 B.T.A. 245 . 3.
Cited 2 timesPublished26 B.T.A. 754 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 29, 1932
Osterloh v. Lucas, 37 Fed. (2d) 277. … Eckert v. Burnet, 283 U. S. 140 . We have noted carefully the recent opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Shiman v.
Cited 1 timesPublished16 B.T.A. 1047 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 14, 1929
LUMMUS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Lummus v. Commissioner Docket No. 24862. … See ; ; *2459 ; ; . *1049 The petitioner cites us to , wherein the Board sustained the petitioner.
Cited 0 timesPublishedManatee Crate Co. v. Commissioner
22 B.T.A. 996 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 31, 1931
Remington Rand, Inc. v. Commissioner, 33 Fed. (2d) 77; Riggs National Bank, 17 B. T. A. 615; Obenchain-Boyer Co., 18 B. T. A. 293. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna