Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.56s
19 B.T.A. 394 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 25, 1930
WELCH, SR., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Welch v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 30227, 41811. … The petitioner was an active member of the Detroit Real Estate Board for approximately 30 years prior to 1927. He was listed as a realtor in the poster of the Detroit Real Estate Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished26 B.T.A. 841 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 17, 1932
In that proceeding the Board held, as we said in Davison, Exec., 20 B. T. … Nichols v. United States, 64 Ct. Cls. 241; certiorari denied, 277 U. S. 584 .
Cited 4 timesPublished30 B.T.A. 496 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 26, 1934
Commissioner v. Garber, supra, is to the same effect. The Board in the Tech Hobbs case, supra, quoted from Commissioner v. … This is the general rule as established by Board and court decisions. The difficulty arises in its application.
Cited 2 timesPublished10 B.T.A. 247 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 26, 1928
SKAER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Skaer v. Commissioner Docket No. 10521. … The only question for this Board to determine is whether the loss occurred in 1919, when the loans were made, or in 1922, when the worthlessness of the security was ascertained.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEastern Steamship Lines v. Commissioner
17 B.T.A. 787 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 7, 1929
EASTERN STEAMSHIP LINES, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Eastern Steamship Lines v. Commissioner Docket No.24870. … Lucas v. Alexander, 279 U.S. 573 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedAckerman-Johnson Co. v. Commissioner
11 B.T.A. 820 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 28, 1928
ACKERMAN-JOHNSON CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Ackerman-Johnson Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 9265. … The Board has no jurisdiction over the determination for 1921, except in so far as such determination may affect the deficiency for 1922.
Cited 0 timesPublished16 B.T.A. 451 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 9, 1929
BULLOCK, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Bullock v. Commissioner Docket No. 28612. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 1 timesPublishedD. N. & E. Walter & Co. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 620 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 10, 1928
WALTER & CO., INC., and WALTER REAL ESTATE CO., PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. D. N. & E. Walter & Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 7618. … the Board's decision, had not been made.
Cited 13 timesPublishedDoric Apartment Co. v. Commissioner
32 B.T.A. 1187 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 9, 1935
Since the determination of the Commis *1191 sioner was incorrect the Board must determine, as best it can from the evidence, the total fair market value of the notes. Cf. Cohan v. … Commissioner, 39 Fed. (2d) 540; Helvering v. Taylor, 293 U. S. 507 . This has been done. The decision on this question of fact is set forth in the findings of fact above.
Cited 3 timesPublished21 B.T.A. 1242 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 19, 1931
COFFEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Coffey v. Commissioner Docket No. 36301. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50. STERNHAGEN dissents.
Cited 2 timesPublished17 B.T.A. 331 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 19, 1929
JOSEPH MCREYNOLDS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. McReynolds v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 21189, 31121. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 1 timesPublished44 B.T.A. 322 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 29, 1941
EPSTEN), PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Epsen v. Commissioner Docket No. 97914. … V. Burkley and F. J. Burkley, 10 shares by F. G. Travis, and 5 shares by Sam Alperson.
Cited 2 timesPublished28 B.T.A. 556 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 27, 1933
SIMPSON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. MARYBELLE SIMPSON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Simpson v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 62015, 62016. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 28 B.T.A. 556 ; 1933 BTA LEXIS 1106 ; June 27, 1933 , Promulgated *1106 Compensation paid to a law firm by a municipality for legal services is subject to Federal taxation. Geo. S.
Cited 0 timesPublished33 B.T.A. 230 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 17, 1935
In Haynes v. Gwin, 137 Ark. 387 ; 209 S. … . * * * In Beaumont v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPacific Southwest Trust & Sav. Bank v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 1372 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 17, 1929
On the authority of the case of Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co., 278 U. … With respect to the other trusts, it is our opinion based on the reasoning of the Reinecke v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLoritan Inv. Co. v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 1412 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 29, 1931
A. 731; and Stephenson v. Commissioner, 43 Fed. (2d) 348, to the effect that where a taxpayer does not keep boobs, the charge-off provisions of the statute do not apply. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublished38 B.T.A. 778 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 7, 1938
Handy & Harman, v. Burnet, 284 U. S. 136 . … Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co., 282 U. S. 359 ; Burnet v. Thompson Oil & Gas Co., 283 U. S. 301 ; Woolford Realty Co. v. Rose, 286 U. S. 319 ; Helvering v. Morgan's Inc., 293 U. S. 121 ; MacMillan Co., 4 B. T. A. 251.
Cited 0 timesPublished38 B.T.A. 245 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 3, 1938
Whitlock v. State Board of Equalization (Mont.), 45 Pac. (2d) 684, 687 ; Parks v. Commissioners of Soldiers' and Sailors' Home, 22 Colo. 86 ; 43 Pac. 542 , 545. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent. See Evans v. Gore, 253 U. S. 245 . SEC. 22. GROSS INCOME.
Cited 1 timesPublishedReid Ice Cream Corp. v. Commissioner
24 B.T.A. 823 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 17, 1931
Keller v. Ashford, 133 U. S. 610 ; Silver King Coalition Mines CVo. v. Silver King C. M. Co., 204 Fed. 166 ; Dancel v. Goodyear Shoe Machinery Co., 137 Fed. 157 ; Mobile Shipbuilding Co. v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 1 timesPublishedWilson Banking Co. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 898 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 20, 1928
WILSON BANKING CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Wilson Banking Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 18952. … See Art Metal Works v. Commissioner, 9 B.T.A. 491 , 493 , and cases there cited.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna