Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

0.57s

  • Atlantic City Elec. Co. v. Commissioner

    15 B.T.A. 1084 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 26, 1929

    A decision in support of the views herein taken is the recent case of Great Lakes Hotel Co. v. Commissioner, 30 Fed. (2d) 1. … We are not unmindful of the recent cases of Ice Service Co. v. Commissioner, 30 Fed. (2d) 230, and Commissioner v. Adolph Hirsch & Co., 30 Fed. (2d) 645.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Russo Fruit Co. v. Commissioner

    23 B.T.A. 1381 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 31, 1931

    A. 1106, in which the Board stated: “ If a debtor has given security for a loan, either in form of collateral or a bond, it is incumbent on him to exhaust the liability on same before he is entitled to claim the debt to be … A. 881; Skinner v. Eaton, 34 Fed. (2d) 575.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kleeman v. Commissioner

    35 B.T.A. 17 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 3, 1936

    The petitioner urges the Board to hold that there was a partnership, while the respondent argues strenuously that there was no partnership. … The Commissioner relies upon the case of Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U. S. 465 , in support of his contention that there was no statutory reorganization.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Turnure v. Commissioner

    9 B.T.A. 871 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 27, 1927

    A definition of charity used by counsel in the case of Vidal v. Girard, 2 How. 127 , and subsequently quoted with approval in many courts, including the Supreme Court (Ould v. Washington Hospital, 95 U. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered on 10 days' notice, wider Rule 50. SteRNhageN dissents.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • L. H. Manning & Co. v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 633 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 10, 1928

    A. 260; Chattanooga Savings Bank v. Brewer, 17 Fed. (2d) 79; certiorari denied May 31, 1927. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on IS days’ notice, wnder Rule 50. Aeundell concurs in the result. Lansdon and Teussell dissent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ehrman v. Commissioner

    41 B.T.A. 652 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 22, 1940

    Commissioner, 77 Fed. (2d) 599; Richards v. Commissioner, 81 Fed. (2d) 369; Welch v. Solomon, 99 Fed. (2d) 41; and Commissioner v. Boeing, 106 Fed. (2d) 305. … Phipps v. Commissioner rests upon the conclusion that the transactions in the taxable year were not sufficient to constitute doing business, and Pope v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rose v. Commissioner

    22 B.T.A. 1334 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 28, 1931

    Lucas v. Earl, 281 U. S. 111 ; Corliss v. Bowers, 281 U. S. 376 ; Lansill et al., 17 B. T. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will Toe entered under Rule 50.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Barton v. Commissioner

    13 B.T.A. 1184 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 23, 1928

    Bogle & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 26 Fed. (2d) 771. The greater part of the business consisted of personal injury suits that were handled on a contingent fee basis. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered for the respondent. Phillips concurs in the result.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Patapsco Ballast Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 1081 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 29, 1925

    Patapsco Ballast Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1800. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 1081 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2677 ; April 29, 1925 , decided Submitted March 31, 1925 . *2677 A corporation reporting on a calendar year basis, having a fractional calendar year in 1918

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mossman, Yarnelle & Co. v. Commissioner

    9 B.T.A. 45 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 11, 1927

    Ludington v. McCaughn, 268 U. S. 106 ; 5 Am. Fed. Tax Rep. 5376; United States v. Flannery, 268 U. S. 98 ; 5 Am. Fed. Tax Rep. 5373. … Keviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Merchants National Building Corp. v. Commissioner

    45 B.T.A. 417 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 22, 1941

    See also Burnet v. Lexington Ice & Coal Co., 62 Fed. (2d) 906; Hellebush v. Commissioner, 65 Fed. (2d) 902; Boggs-Burnam & Co., 26 B. T. A. 988; *425 affd., 71 Fed. (2d) 999; Will T. Caswell, 36 B. T. … A. 816; First National Bank of Greeley v. United States, 9 Fed. Supp. 28; affd., 86 Fed. (2d) 938.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Phoenix Seed & Feed Co. v. Commissioner

    2 B.T.A. 909 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 19, 1925

    Phoenix Seed & Feed Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1955. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 909 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2224 ; October 19, 1925 , Decided Submitted July 15, 1925 . *2224 Method of determining excess-profits tax for 1917. Lawrence H.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dallas Athletic Asso. v. Commissioner

    8 B.T.A. 1036 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 29, 1927

    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT., PETITIONER, v. Dallas Athletic Asso. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1310. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Midland Valley R.R. v. Commissioner

    19 B.T.A. 423 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 26, 1930

    MIDLAND VALLEY RAILROAD CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Midland Valley R.R. v. Commissioner Docket No. 25000. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 19 B.T.A. 423 ; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2405 ; March 26, 1930 , Promulgated *2405 1.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 713 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 9, 1930

    KELLY, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Allen v. Commissioner Docket No. 36157. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 20 B.T.A. 713 ; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2052 ; September 9, 1930 , Promulgated *2052 John A. Connor, Esq., for the petitioners. W. Frank Gibbs, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mechanics Bank & Trust Co. v. Commissioner

    18 B.T.A. 237 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 18, 1929

    MECHANICS BANK & TRUST CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Mechanics Bank & Trust Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 29974. … The minutes of the board of directors' meeting of January 12, 1922, contain the following recitals and resolution with respect to the K.S & E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Aaron Ward & Sons v. Commissioner

    23 B.T.A. 1279 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 5, 1931

    AARON WARD & SONS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Aaron Ward & Sons v. Commissioner Docket No. 31568. … The case at bar is clearly controlled by the decisions of the United States Supreme Court in , and by , and , heretofore decided by this Board.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 868 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 24, 1925

    Smith v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 1020, 1021, 1022. … Smith, for the year 1920 736.20 *2776 *870 and from the several Commissioner's letters asserting such deficiencies each of the above-named taxpayers appeal to this Board. DECISION.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Merchants Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

    38 B.T.A. 1343 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 8, 1938

    United States v. Wells, 283 U. S. 102 ; Becker v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 296 U. S. 48; Colorado National Bank of Denver v. Commissioner, 805 U. S. 23 . … Keviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the petitioner. Disney dissents. Sec. 302.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Commissioner

    3 B.T.A. 726 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 13, 1926

    Miller v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 1596, 1601. … V. Underwood. In the year 1917, Addison Miller and M. V. Underwood were partners on a 50 per cent basis under the name of W. A. Miller & Sons. W. A.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.