Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.43s
Foye Lumber & Tie Co. v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 271 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 24, 1935
upon Welch v. … Jones Syndicate v. Commissioner, 23 Fed. (2d) 833.
Cited 2 timesPublished13 B.T.A. 395 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 19, 1928
KIZER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. MABEL A. KIZER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Kizer v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 6758, 6759. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 2 timesPublished21 B.T.A. 500 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 29, 1930
Also, see Rea v. Heiner, 6 Fed. (2d) 389; Flannery v. Willcuts, 25 Fed. (2d) 951; Meyer v. United Stales, 60 Ct. Cls. 474. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50. LáNsdoN and Trussell dissent.
Cited 0 timesPublished28 B.T.A. 1086 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 15, 1933
For this reason it was held in Turner v. Turner, 108 Fed. 785 , that proceedings to collect alimony could not be enjoined by a bankruptcy court. See also Lynde v. Lynde, 52 Atl. 694 ; Noyes v. Hubbard, 23 Atl. 727 . … O'Malley-Keyes v. Eaton, 24 Fed. (2d) 436; Young v. Gnichtel, 28 Fed. (2d) 789; S. A. Lynch, 23 B.T.A. 435 . Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublishedShell Employees' Ben. Fund v. Commissioner
44 B.T.A. 452 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 13, 1941
SHELL EMPLOYEES' BENEFIT FUND, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Shell Employees' Ben. Fund v. Commissioner Docket No. 100399. … The board of directors elects its chairman and vice chairman; the director *1326 appointed by the company is secretary-treasurer. Petitioner's general administration is in the hands of the board of directors.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFarmers & Merchants State Bank v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 130 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 23, 1925
Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Commissioner Docket No. 1811. … From the pleadings and stipulation filed, the Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT. 1. The taxpayer is a Minnesota corporation with its principal office at Pine City. 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMutual Chem. Co. v. Commissioner
12 B.T.A. 578 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 13, 1928
The petitioner’s counsel contends that as a matter of law the term “ goods on hand ” as used in the regulations does not include raw materials and he cites as authority for his contention Cumpston v. Haigh, 2 Bing. N. … Reviewed by the Board. Recomputation of the deficiency should be made under Rule 6£(c).
Cited 2 timesPublishedPoinsett Mills v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 6 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 2, 1924
Poinsett Mills v. Commissioner Docket No. 83. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 6 ; 1924 BTA LEXIS 282 ; October 2, 1924 , decided Submitted September 26, 1924 . *282 A contribution made by a corporation to a church maintained in its mill village, producing
Cited 9 timesPublishedH. K. McCann Co. v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 234 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 15, 1928
A. 982; Fuller & Smith v. Routzahn, supra; Armstrong v. McCaughn, 21 Fed. (2d) 637. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered accordingly.
Cited 1 timesPublishedGuaranty Trust Co. v. Commissioner
3 B.T.A. 459 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 26, 1926
Guaranty Trust Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 3272. … On reference to the Board, JAMES did not participate.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMichael Carpenter Co. v. Commissioner
47 B.T.A. 626 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 21, 1942
McLaughlin v. Harr, 99 Fed. (2d) 638; Merchants Bank Building Co. v. Helvering, 84 Fed. (2d) 478. … It points out that the Board found no evidence of a donative intent and that it agreed with this finding.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCliver-Wright-Rainey Co. v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 561 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 9, 1925
Cliver-Wright-Rainey Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1324. United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 561 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2334 ; September 9, 1925 , Decided Submitted June 8, 1925 . *2334 1. … From the evidence submitted the Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT.
Cited 0 timesPublished39 B.T.A. 172 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 24, 1939
Groman v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 82 ; Helvering v. … Hellmich v. Hellman, 276 U.S. 233 ; *1078 Canal-Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Commissioner, 63 Fed.(2d) 619, 620 ; Gossett v. Commissioner, 59 Fed.(2d) 365, 367 ; Tootle v. Commissioner, 58 Fed.(2d) 576, 580 .
Cited 2 timesPublished7 B.T.A. 630 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 13, 1927
HENRY DEFORD, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. De Ford v. Commissioner Docket No. 10114. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered *3133 for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublished45 B.T.A. 894 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 5, 1941
Upon appeal of Ihose cases the Supreme Court on March 3, 1941, in Helvering v. *896 Le Gierse, 312 U. S. 531 , and Keller v. Commissioner, 312 U. … Guggenheim, v. Rasguin, 312 U. S. 254 ; Powers v. Commissioner, 312 U. S. 259 ; United States v. Ryerson, 312 U. S. 260 . Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered under Rule 50.
Cited 2 timesPublished17 B.T.A. 1173 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 31, 1929
Cited in Hecht v. Malley, 265 U. S. 144 ; Albert M. Briggs, 7 B. T. A. 409; Philadelphia & Reading Relief Association, 4 B. T. A. 713. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision of no deficiency will he entered. Smith and Muedock concur in the result.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 616 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 7, 1928
AMERICAN REFRIGERATOR TRANSIT CO., PETITIONER, MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., INTERVENER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 19019. … Williams, chairman of the boards of directors of both the Missouri Pacific and the Wabash, and H. B. Kooser, president of the Transit Co., subsequent to April, 1920.
Cited 1 timesPublishedWestern Zinc Oxide Co. v. Commissioner
7 B.T.A. 972 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 2, 1927
WESTERN ZING OXIDE CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Western Zinc Oxide Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 8604. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 7 B.T.A. 972 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3051 ; August 2, 1927 , Promulgated *3051 C. J. Walker, Esq., for the petitioner. A. G. Bouchard, Esq., for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJ. E. Siebel Sons' Co. v. Commissioner
5 B.T.A. 588 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 23, 1926
SIEBEL SONS' COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. J. E. Siebel Sons' Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1130. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 5 B.T.A. 588 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2829 ; November 23, 1926 , Decided *2829 Edward E. Gore, C.P.A., for the petitioner. L. C. Mitchell, Esq., for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTerre Haute House Co. v. Commissioner
17 B.T.A. 384 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 20, 1929
Duffy v. Central Railroad of New Jersey, 268 U. S. *386 55 ; Simmons & Hammond Manufacturing Co., 1 B. T. A. 803; Gladding Dry Goods Co., 2 B. T. A. 336; Louis C. Levy, 2 B. T. A. 361. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna