Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

1.79s

  • Triangle Realty Co. v. Commissioner

    12 B.T.A. 867 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 27, 1928

    TRIANGLE REALTY CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Triangle Realty Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 14830. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 12 B.T.A. 867 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3437 ; June 27, 1928 , Promulgated *3437 J. A. Selby, Esq., for the petitioner. T. M. Mather, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Waynesboro Mfrs. Asso. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 911 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 30, 1925

    Asso. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1277. … Section V. To endeavor to secure efficient traffic and transportation facilities for employer and employee. Section VI.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Atlantic Importing Co. v. Commissioner

    3 B.T.A. 1108 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 31, 1926

    Atlantic Importing Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 3674. United States Board of Tax Appeals 3 B.T.A. 1108 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2486 ; March 31, 1926 , Decided Submitted October 21, 1925 . *2486 1. … Rein; and WHEREAS, it appears to the Board that such surrender and cancellation of the said contract between the company and Frederick Fauerbach and Arthur M.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Commissioner

    15 B.T.A. 638 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 27, 1929

    Co. v. Irwin, 249 Fed. 726 ; Fred W. Warner, 5 B. T. A. 963; Alfred LeBlanc, 7 B. T. A. 256. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered wnder Rule 50.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Seavey & Flarsheim Brokerage Co. v. Commissioner

    41 B.T.A. 198 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 26, 1940

    There is no question here of the assignment of income by the earner as in Lucas v. Earl, 281 U. S. 111 , and Burnet v. Leininger, 285 U. … Lucas v. Ox Fibre Brush Co., 281 U. S. 115 ; Green Oil Soap Co. v. Reinecke, 36 Fed. (2d) 599; Edwards v. Keith, 231 Fed. 110 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Coombs v. Commissioner

    30 B.T.A. 35 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 8, 1934

    LULU TIRRILL COOMBS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Coombs v. Commissioner Docket No. 62490. … Reviewed *1393 by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Stoner v. Commissioner

    37 B.T.A. 249 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 1, 1938

    STONER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Stoner v. Commissioner Docket No. 81922. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 37 B.T.A. 249 ; 1938 BTA LEXIS 1064 ; February 1, 1938 , Promulgated *1064 Special tax bills and sewer tax warrants, issued by a city to a contractor in payment for improvements and payable

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Musical Instrument Sales Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 402 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 27, 1925

    Musical Instrument Sales Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 218. … Final decision of the Board will be settled on consent or on seven days' notice, in accordance with Rule 50. OPINION.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Inv. Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 272 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 8, 1925

    Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 392. … On this branch of the case it is obvious that there is no evidence before the Board having any material bearing upon the issue between the taxpayer and the Commissioner.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • G. F. Cotter Supply Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 1108 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 6, 1925

    Cotter Supply Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 997. … She attended all the meetings of the board of directors and all stockholders' meetings during 1918.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jopling v. Commissioner

    46 B.T.A. 262 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 4, 1942

    JOPLING, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Jopling v. Commissioner Docket No. 105579. … From and after September 1937 petitioner was a director and chairman of the board of directors of the corporation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Berks Foundry & Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner

    5 B.T.A. 756 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 8, 1926

    BERKS FOUNDRY & MANUFACTURING CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Berks Foundry & Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 6998. … The first issue is governed by the Board's decision in the .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dakota Cent. Tel. Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 1002 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 13, 1925

    Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 703. United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 1002 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2721 ; April 13, 1925 , decided Submitted March 25, 1925 . *2721 Alfred L. Geiger, Esq., for the taxpayer. A. … From the petition and answer filed and the stipulations of counsel the Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT. 1. The taxpayer is a South Dakota corporation with its principal office at Aberdeen, S. Dak.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • H. K. McCann Co. v. Commissioner

    14 B.T.A. 234 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 15, 1928

    A. 982; Fuller & Smith v. Routzahn, supra; Armstrong v. McCaughn, 21 Fed. (2d) 637. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered accordingly.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Leonard v. Commissioner

    21 B.T.A. 549 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 3, 1930

    LEONARD, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. J. H. EVANS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. HARRY HEASLEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. … Leonard v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 40243, 41203, 41217.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • George Whittell & Co. v. Commissioner

    34 B.T.A. 1070 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 7, 1936

    GEORGE WHITTELL & COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. George Whittell & Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 72414. … Resolutions required by the bank were passed by the board of the California corporation on November 29, 1929, and further resolutions by the boards of both corporations on December 9, 1929.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Katz & Besthoff, Ltd. v. Commissioner

    5 B.T.A. 750 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 8, 1926

    KATZ & BESTHOFF, LTD., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Katz & Besthoff, Ltd. v. Commissioner Docket No. 4707. … At a meeting of the board of directors on February 8, 1918, the salaries were increased from $15,000 to $18,000 a year.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner

    9 B.T.A. 980 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 29, 1927

    We do not agree with the petitioner that the amount was released and became free assets in accordance with the decision in the case of Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States, supra. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • S. B. Smythe Co. v. Commissioner

    4 B.T.A. 327 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 23, 1926

    Smythe Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 3778. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 4 B.T.A. 327 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2304 ; July 23, 1926 , Decided *2304 The evidence does not show that the taxpayer ascertained, during the year 1920, a debt in the amount of $60,353.02 to have

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chormann v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 920 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 21, 1928

    CHORMANN, EXECUTORS, ESTATE OF FREDERICK CHORMANN, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Chormann v. Commissioner Docket No. 10345. … LOVE: Practically the identical facts, except as to parties, were considered by the Board, and the same issue, as presented herein, was decided favorably to the petitioner in .

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.