Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.56s
9 B.T.A. 1123 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 10, 1928
Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, v/nder Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Gas & Elec. Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 245 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 22, 1935
A. 762, the Board held, in a case very similar to this, that a consolidated return was improper. That decision has been reversed by the Second Circuit in Corner Broadway-Maiden Lane, Inc. v. … On this point compare the latter part of the court’s opinion in Corner Broadway-Maiden Lane, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublished8 B.T.A. 173 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 22, 1927
Substantially the same conclusion was reached by the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Eighth Circuit in Willcuts v. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered on W days' notice, under Rule 50.
Cited 1 timesPublished17 B.T.A. 1002 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 17, 1929
BARNES, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. ADELAIDE C. BARNES, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. EUGENE FOX, PETITIONER, v. … Barnes v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 17410, 17411, 20535.
Cited 0 timesPublished32 B.T.A. 372 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 16, 1935
HERBERT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Herbert v. Commissioner Docket No. 72949. … Kauffmann, Comprising a quorum of the board. The minutes of the previous meeting were read and upon motion were ordered to be approved.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFaroll-Bittel Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 467 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 31, 1925
Faroll-Bittel Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 737. United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 467 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2886 ; January 31, 1925 , decided Submitted December 18, 1924 . *2886 Forest D. … The taxpayer appealed to the Board with a petition setting forth the grounds upon which it claimed the right to classification as a personal service corporation during the two years named.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTibby-Brawner Glass Co. v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 918 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 19, 1925
Tibby-Brawner Glass Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 2860. … He, himself, was unable to qualify as an expert and the Board sustained the Commissioner's objection to the evidence relative to valuations on the real estate.
Cited 1 timesPublished2 B.T.A. 428 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 7, 1925
Ordway v. Commissioner Docket No. 1113. United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 428 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2404 ; September 7, 1925 , Decided Submitted March 23, 1925 . *2404 W. F. Gibbs, Esq., for the Commissioner. … The matter was submitted upon the pleadings, from which the Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT. The taxpayer is an officer of the United States Army.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorthwest Bancorporation v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 160 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 10, 1935
Brandon Corporation v. Commissioner, 71 Fed. (2d) 762. … Eeviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the resfondent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited Markets, Inc. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 372 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 28, 1928
UNITED MARKETS, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. United Markets, Inc. v. Commissioner Docket No. 11489. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 10 B.T.A. 372 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 4128 ; January 28, 1928 , promulgated *4128 1.
Cited 0 timesPublished34 B.T.A. 1215 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 28, 1936
Taylor Oil & Gas Co. v. Commissioner, 47 Fed. (2d) 108; certiorari denied, 283 U. S. 62 ; Northwest Utilities Securities Co. v. Commissioner, 67 Fed. (2d) 619; Hellebush v. Commis sioner, 65 Fed. (2d) 902. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBump Confectionery Co. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 50 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 22, 1926
A. 1339, the inapplicability of the reasoning of the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. Anderson, 269 U. S. 422 , to a situation such as is here present. … On reference to the Board, Phillips dissents.
Cited 8 timesPublished20 B.T.A. 715 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 9, 1930
MAURICE SELIG, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Selig v. Commissioner Docket No. 29530. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 20 B.T.A. 715 ; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2053 ; September 9, 1930 , Promulgated *2053 Thomas H. Meek, C.P.A., for the petitioner. John E. Marshall, Esq., for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedConstitution Pub. Co. v. Commissioner
22 B.T.A. 426 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 27, 1931
CONSTITUTION PUBLISHING COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Constitution Pub. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 34159. … the date of final decision by said Board.
Cited 19 timesPublished38 B.T.A. 926 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 18, 1938
LAIRD, EXECUTORS OF THE ESTGATE OF WILLIAM WINDER LAIRD, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Laird v. Commissioner Docket No. 51654. … After the decision by the Supreme Court in Helvering v. Taylor, 293 U.S. 507 , the Third Circuit reversed the decision of the Board and remanded the case as above noted. Laird v. Commissioner, 85 Fed.(2d) 598 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedSouth Euclid Sav. & Loan Co. v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 1079 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 9, 1929
While it is not brought out what amount of stock a borrower was required to hold, it is settled by the decision in United States v. Cambridge Loan & Building Co., 278 U. S. 55 ; 1928 C. C. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment of no deficiency wül Joe entered.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorthwestern Drug Co. v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 222 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 14, 1928
NORTHWESTERN DRUG CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Northwestern Drug Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 13139. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStetson & Ellison v. Commissioner
11 B.T.A. 397 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 3, 1928
STETSON & ELLISON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Stetson & Ellison v. Commissioner Docket No. 8736. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioner on 10 days' notice, under Rule 50.
Cited 7 timesPublished32 B.T.A. 561 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 30, 1935
The minutes of a meeting of its board of directors held on January 23, 1929, provide in part as follows: Tile Chairman presented to the Board, for its consideration, a proposal to offer to Common Stockholders of this Corporation … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Bule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublished2 B.T.A. 64 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 15, 1925
Welsch v. Commissioner Docket No. 260. United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 64 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2558 ; June 15, 1925 , Decided Submitted May 29, 1925 . *2558 Louis I. Kane, C.P.A., for the taxpayer. Willis D. … From the pleadings and from depositions and documentary evidence introduced, the Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna