Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.32s
4 B.T.A. 813 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 15, 1926
Williams v. Commissioner Docket No. 8173. United States Board of Tax Appeals 4 B.T.A. 813 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2174 ; September 15, 1926 , Decided *2174 R. A. Cost, C.P.A., for the petitioner. A. … LITTLETON: The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the court in , and the decision of the Board in the . Judgment for the Commissioner.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 B.T.A. 592 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 13, 1925
Cohen v. Commissioner Docket No. 1437. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 592 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2870 ; February 13, 1925 , decided Submitted February 2, 1925 . *2870 The deficiency is determined in accordance with stipulation filed by counsel.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPoly Holding Corp. v. Commissioner
30 B.T.A. 911 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 14, 1934
Petitioner relies on Bonwit Teller & Co. v. Commissioner, 53 Fed. (2d) 381, decided by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and also cites 719 Fifth Avenue Co. v. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered, for the respondent. Tkaiumell and Van Fossan dissent.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 B.T.A. 824 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 15, 1926
Hillyer v. Commissioner Docket No. 9569. United States Board of Tax Appeals 4 B.T.A. 824 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2192 ; September 15, 1926 , Decided *2192 J. A. Isaacson, Esq., for the petitioner. A. … LITTLETON: The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the court in , and the decision of the Board in the . Judgment for the Commissioner.
Cited 0 timesPublished17 B.T.A. 733 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 30, 1929
Flint v. Stone-Tracey Co., 220 U. S. 107 ; Von Baumback v. Sargent Land Co., 242 U. S. 503 ; Edwards v. Chile Copper Co., 270 U. S. 452 . … Beviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50. Smith dissents.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Gas & Elec. Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 245 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 22, 1935
A. 762, the Board held, in a case very similar to this, that a consolidated return was improper. That decision has been reversed by the Second Circuit in Corner Broadway-Maiden Lane, Inc. v. … On this point compare the latter part of the court’s opinion in Corner Broadway-Maiden Lane, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublished4 B.T.A. 1159 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 28, 1926
Sullivan, 7 Ga. 144 -148; and O'Barr v. Alexander & Trammell, 37 Ga. 195 . In Lilly v. … This Board has had occasion to pass upon this question in numerous decisions. In Appeal of Pan-American Hide Co., 1 B. T.
Cited 0 timesPublished23 B.T.A. 1055 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 6, 1931
O'DELL, GUARDIAN, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Lowrance v. Commissioner Docket No. 27773. … Under this state of facts, it is held that the Board has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and the proceeding will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Cf. . Reviewed by the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTanner Oil Co. v. Commissioner
20 B.T.A. 794 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 12, 1930
See Cooper v. United States, 9 Fed. (2d) 216; Harry W. Dubiske, 17 B. T. A. 853; Ernest Miller, 15 B. T. A. 811; and Chas. F. Long, 12 B. T. A. 488. ¡Reviewed by the Board. Decision will, be entered for the respondent.
Cited 6 timesPublished16 B.T.A. 907 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 4, 1929
In Noel v. Parrott, 15 Fed. (2d) 669 (certiorari denied, 273 U. … Not having been informed as to the authority for the payment, we do not know whether the»expenditure was made pursuant to a resolution of the corporation’s board of directors or stockholders, or an order of one or more of
Cited 6 timesPublished14 B.T.A. 1253 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 14, 1929
PETTIT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Pettit v. Commissioner Docket No. 23314. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 14 B.T.A. 1253 ; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2967 ; January 14, 1929 , Promulgated *2967 T. J. Leahy, Esq., for the petitioner. Shelby S. Faulkner, Esq., for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 B.T.A. 816 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 15, 1926
Schaefer v. Commissioner Docket No. 5346. United States Board of Tax Appeals 4 B.T.A. 816 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2179 ; September 15, 1926 , Decided *2179 R.H. Cost, C.P.A., for the petitioner. A. … LITTLETON: The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the court in , and the decision of the Board in the . Judgment for the Commissioner.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGibb Instrument Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 278 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 8, 1925
Gibb Instrument Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 70. … Therefore, there is nothing before the Board upon which to base findings of facts. DECISION. The taxpayer has failed to present evidence to prove the allegations of its petition.
Cited 0 timesPublishedErie Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 531 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 31, 1925
Erie Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 456. … We have already held that this Board has such jurisdiction. .
Cited 0 timesPublished16 B.T.A. 1331 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 16, 1929
Petitioner relies upon Shearer v. Anderson, 16 Fed. (2d) 995, and W. S. Bronson, 9 B. T. A. 1008. Those cases are not authority for the claim here made. … A. 1129, the facts were similar to those in this proceeding and in deciding that petitioner was not entitled to the deduction claimed, the Board said: It seems to us that the section of the statute above quoted only allows
Cited 7 timesPublished1 B.T.A. 748 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 16, 1925
Hirschmann v. Commissioner Docket No. 685. … Counsel for the Commissioner and the taxpayer filed a stipulation with the Board whereby it is agreed that a deficiency of $376.84 exists. DECISION.
Cited 0 timesPublished8 B.T.A. 475 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 4, 1927
D. 496 ; Kinney v. Newbold, 115 Iowa 145 ; 88 N. … See also Osgood v. Breed, 17 Mass. 356 . The law is well settled that an advancement creates no debt to the person making it and in all its features and in its very nature is distinguishable from a debt. Dawson v.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 B.T.A. 102 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 28, 1924
Kline v. Commissioner Docket No. 282. … The Commissioner has pleaded in bar of such relief from this Board that the Commissioner alone has authority to grant such an application.
Cited 0 timesPublishedR. D. Fleming Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 997 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 13, 1925
Fleming Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 736. United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 997 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2717 ; April 13, 1925 , decided Submitted March 31, 1925 . *2717 Newell W. Ellison, Esq., for the taxpayer. … From the peladings and from the statement made by counsel for the Commissioner at the hearing the Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilson Syndicate Trust v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 508 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 30, 1928
But arriving at that conclusion, does not solve the problem presented to the Board. In the case of Burk-Waggoner Oil Association v. Hopkins, 269 U. … See also Hecht v. Malley, 265 U. S. 144 .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna