Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.78s
17 B.T.A. 950 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 15, 1929
NORTHROP, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Northrop v. Commissioner Docket No. 20358. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 1 timesPublishedProtective Fin. Corp. v. Commissioner
23 B.T.A. 308 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 18, 1931
PROTECTIVE FINANCE CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Protective Fin. Corp. v. Commissioner Docket No. 38902. … September 4, 1923, a few months after organization of petitioner the board of directors passed resolutions as follows: President C. F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRouse, Hempstone & Co. v. Commissioner
7 B.T.A. 1018 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 8, 1927
Crabtree Co. v. Commissioner, 5 B. T. A. 732, and cases there cited. … Reviewed by the Board. . Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, v/nder Rule 50.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNeusteter Suit Co. v. Commissioner
8 B.T.A. 477 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 4, 1927
NEUSTETER SUIT CO., WOMEN'S APPAREL CO., AND WEAKLEY CLOAK & SUIT CO., PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Neusteter Suit Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 4001. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOscar Daniels Co. v. Commissioner
23 B.T.A. 260 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 15, 1931
OSCAR DANIELS COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Oscar Daniels Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 33582. … UNITED STATES SHIPING BOARD, EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION, (Signed) By J. C. ACKERSON, Vice President. [SEAL.] Attest: (Signed) JAS. V. WATSON, Assistant Secretary.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWatt & Holmes Hardware Co. v. Commissioner
8 B.T.A. 372 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 29, 1927
WATT & HOLMES HARDWARE CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Watt & Holmes Hardware Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 8872. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 8 B.T.A. 372 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 2893 ; September 29, 1927 , Promulgated *2893 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGeorge C. Heimerdinger Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 383 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 27, 1925
Heimerdinger Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 285. … The Board does not consider that the evidence which was offered satisfactorily proves the allegations of the petition.
Cited 0 timesPublished44 Ohio Law. Abs. 437 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 3, 1944
As held in the case of Wellnitz v Evatt, 19 O. … People v. Loughman, 100 Fed. (2d) 387. As stated in First National Bank v. Anderson, 269 U. S. 341 , 70 L.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWestern Adjustment & Inspection Co. v. Commissioner
45 B.T.A. 721 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 18, 1941
The board of directors of petitioner determined what expenditures represented “cost.” … Helvering v. Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc., 311 U. S. 46 ; Crane- *728 Johnson Co. v. Helvering, 311 U. S. 54 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoston & M. R. Co. v. Commissioner
8 B.T.A. 490 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 4, 1927
BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD, SUCCESSOR TO BOSTON & LOWELL RAILROAD CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Boston & M. R. Co. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 8847, 9102. … The second issue is governed by the decision of the Board in *2864 .
Cited 0 timesPublished30 B.T.A. 1040 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 26, 1934
The United States Supreme Court, in the cases of Burnet v. Wells, 289 U.S. 670 , and Du Pont v. Commissioner, 289 U.S. 685 , has declared *1044 section 219 (h) of the Act of 1926 to be constitutional. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered under Bule 50. SteRNHageN dissents.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSchiller Piano Co. v. Commissioner
23 B.T.A. 376 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 21, 1931
A. 1059; and United States v. Cedarburg Milk Co., 288 Fed. 996 . In Houston Brothers Co., 21 B. T. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 1 timesPublished36 B.T.A. 764 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 27, 1937
In Duffin v. … A. 518; Budd v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKaskaskia Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner
22 B.T.A. 210 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 18, 1931
That phrase has been amply expounded by the United States Supreme Court and this Board. McCoach v. Insurance Co. of North America, 244 U. S. 585 ; United States v. Boston Insurance Co., 269 U. … Tahao Ozawa v. United States, 260 U. S. 178 .
Cited 2 timesPublished32 B.T.A. 675 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 29, 1935
A. 472, the Board considered the same question on similar facts. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered imder Buie 50.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCannon Valley Milling Co. v. Commissioner
44 B.T.A. 763 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 19, 1941
A. 81, 95; Helvering v. Hampton, 79 Fed. (2d) 358; and Welch v. Helvering, 290 U. S. 111 . … On rehearing the deduction was disallowed by the court on the ground that the guardianship expenses were not business expenses, an issue which was not raised before the Board. In Carondelet Building Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished39 B.T.A. 373 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 9, 1939
The Board rejected the argument. … Daniel Brothers Co. v. Commissioner, 28 Fed. (2d) 761; Henrietta Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner, 52 Fed. (2d) 931; Corbett Investment Co. v. Helvering, 75 Fed. (2d) 525; MacDonald v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBrampton Woolen Co. v. Commissioner
18 B.T.A. 1075 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 11, 1930
BRAMPTON WOOLEN CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Brampton Woolen Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 24842. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 18 B.T.A. 1075 ; 1930 BTA LEXIS 2529 ; February 11, 1930 , Promulgated *2529 1.
Cited 2 timesPublished31 B.T.A. 899 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 18, 1934
Reviewed by the Board. Decision will l>e entered under Rule 50. Black, Van Fossan, and Leech dissent. … If there was a completed gift by the petitioner to his children, I see no occasion for the Board to inquire as to the purpose or motive thereof.
Cited 7 timesPublishedAmerican Sulphur Royalty Co. v. Commissioner
34 B.T.A. 439 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 24, 1936
In the case of McCahill v. Helvering, 75 Fed. (2d) 725, which affirmed the Board, 29 B. T. … The Board said in Stouts Mountain Coal Co., 4 B. T.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna