Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.59s
National Outdoor Advertising Bureau, Inc. v. Commissioner
32 B.T.A. 1025 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 25, 1935
A. 441; affirmed on this point in Garden Homes Co. v. … A. 114, 118, South Carolina Produce Association v. Commissioner, 50 Fed. (2d) 742, affirming 19 B. T. A. 1028; Riverdale Co-operative Creamery Association v. Commissioner, 48 Fed. (2d) 711.
Cited 0 timesPublished27 B.T.A. 824 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 28, 1933
Since these cases were decided the Supreme Court has ruled upon the question in Eckert v. Burnet, 283 U. S. 140 . … The respondent questioned this value and the petitioner had a second appraisal made in 1928 by the Allentown Real Estate Board, which put the 1913 value of the land at $195,000.
Cited 0 timesPublished7 B.T.A. 318 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 14, 1927
After the decision of the board in that case, it was carried into the courts, finally to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, and the courts rendered judgment in harmony with the decision rendered by the board, Mitchel … v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRoshek Bros. Co. v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 260 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 30, 1925
Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1844. United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 260 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2494 ; June 30, 1925 , Decided Submitted May 1, 1925 . *2494 1. Increased depreciation allowed. 2. … On this point the Board must sustain the Commissioner, on the authority of the .
Cited 0 timesPublished11 B.T.A. 291 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 29, 1928
It was so decided in United States v. … Tliis principle of law was recognized by this Board in W. E. Caldwell Co., Inc., 6 B. T. A. 47, where the Board said: The reasoning advanced in the Stange case [Appeal of A. II. Stange, 1 B. T.
Cited 8 timesPublishedValvoline Oil Co. v. Commissioner
47 B.T.A. 795 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 6, 1942
We are of the opinion that under the holding of the Supreme Court in Helvering v. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered under Rule 50. Disney concurs only in the result. SEC. 26. CREDITS OF CORPORATIONS.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Chicle Co. v. Commissioner
23 B.T.A. 221 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 14, 1931
Following the principle laid down in Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co., 271 U. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered under Bule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublishedResthaven Memorial Cemetery v. Commissioner
30 B.T.A. 383 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 13, 1934
See Burnet v. San Joaguin Fruit & Investment Co., 52 Fed. (2d) 123; Commissioner v. New York Trust Co., 54 Fed. (2d) 463. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Bule SO.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGoldie Oil & Gas Co. v. Commissioner
18 B.T.A. 443 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 6, 1929
GOLDIE OIL & GAS CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Goldie Oil & Gas Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 25281. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 18 B.T.A. 443 ; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2043 ; December 6, 1929 , Promulgated *2043 Held, that the evidence is not sufficient to establish petitioner's claim that its tax for 1920 should be computed
Cited 0 timesPublishedEdward Hines Lumber Co. v. Commissioner
35 B.T.A. 364 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 29, 1937
S. 677 ; Seiberling Rubber Co. v. Commissioner, 70 Fed. (2d) 651, affirming a Board memorandum opinion of June 29, 1932; certiorari denied, 293 U. S. 611 ; Corco Oil Refining Corporation v. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered wnder Bule 60.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Tel. & Cable Co. v. Commissioner
17 B.T.A. 783 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 7, 1929
Sternhagen : The first issue presents the identical question which has been decided adversely to petitioner by the Board as to 1919, American Telegraph & Cable Co., 2 B. T. … A. 991, decided October 26, 1925, and as to 1922 by the Court of Claims in American Telegraph & Gable Co. v. United States, 61 Ct. Cls. 326, certiorari denied, 271 U. S. 660 .
Cited 0 timesPublished18 B.T.A. 218 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 14, 1929
Myer v. United States, 60 Ct. Cls. 474; Anna L. Stark Lavelle, Executrix, 8 B. T. A. 1150, 1156. … Starch Lavelle, Executrix, supra; Rea v. Heiner, 6 Fed. (2d) 389.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBank of New York & Trust Co. v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 197 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 5, 1930
Y. 288 ; Manning v. Board of Tax Commissioners, 40 E. I. 400; In re Murphy Estate, 102 Cal. 740 , and others. … Reviewed by the Board'. Judgment will be entered, wider Bule 50. MuRdock concurs in the result only.
Cited 3 timesPublished31 B.T.A. 224 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 3, 1934
In United States v. … The decision of the state court has no binding effect on the Board. Joseph Edward Phillips, Executor, 7 B.T.A. 1054 ; Commissioner v. Nevin, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedE. B. Higley & Co. v. Commissioner
25 B.T.A. 127 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 11, 1932
In United States v. Kirby Lumber *128 Co., 284 U. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50. Marquette and Sternhagen dissent.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMobile Delivery Co. v. Commissioner
8 B.T.A. 1224 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 5, 1927
MOBILE DELIVERY CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Mobile Delivery Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 7124. … Should there be a tie vote, in the Board of Directors, on any proposition, the said Board shall call in an umpire and his decision shall be final.
Cited 1 timesPublished10 B.T.A. 723 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 14, 1928
In the case of Blair v. … United States v. Robbins, 269 U. S. 315 . In view of the foregoing, it is our opinion that the amounts received by the petitioner as salary, fees, etc., should be taxable to him. Reviewed by the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished18 B.T.A. 1121 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 13, 1930
S. 327 , and Reinicke v. Northern Trust Co., 278 U. S. 339 . … Section 808 (e) of the Revenue Act of 1926 specifically gives this Board jurisdiction to redetermine a deficiency in tax greater than that determined by the respondent if claim for such greater amount “is asserted by the
Cited 6 timesPublishedVancoh Realty Co. v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 918 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 17, 1936
A. 717, and cases relied on therein, dismissed on motion of the Commissioner, 77 Fed. (2d) 994; Commissioner v. Central Republic Trust Co., 75 Fed. (2d) 708; Helvering v. … Decision will be entered v/nder Rule 50. Art. 153.
Cited 6 timesPublished44 B.T.A. 39 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 3, 1941
Helvering v. Bashford, 302 U. S. 454 . … United States v. Stewart, 311 U. S. 60 .
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna