Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.42s
American Trust Co. v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 30 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 14, 1930
AMERICAN TRUST CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. American Trust Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 15179. … The Board is entitled to full information upon which conclusions are based and the question of the worthlessness of the debts is for the determination of the Board.
Cited 3 timesPublished24 B.T.A. 798 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 13, 1931
A. 393, affirmed in Stewart v. Commissioner, 52 Fed. (2d) 17. In affirming the Board’s decision the Circuit Court expressly disagreed with the case of White v. Maddison, 45 Fed. (2d) 335, which holds to the contrary. … The Board is in no position from this record to make such an estimate as is suggested in Cohan v.
Cited 5 timesPublished29 B.T.A. 282 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 31, 1933
In Tootle v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 1 timesPublished20 B.T.A. 742 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 10, 1930
The Board in that case held that the taxpayer sustained a loss of the cost to him of the shares of stock which he surrendered. … Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U. S. 189 ; Towne v. McElligott, 274 Fed. 960 .” But Julian Burdick was not the owner of all the common stock of the corporation.
Cited 12 timesPublished38 B.T.A. 1292 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 6, 1938
KELLEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. HERBERT W. KELLEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. E. FLORENCE KELLEY, PETITIONER, v. … Kelley v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 89876, 89877, 89878.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCotton Concentration Co. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 121 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 21, 1926
That the term “rentals” does not include payments made for improvements has been settled by the Supreme Court in Duffy v. Central R. R. Co., 268 U. S. 55 ; 45 Sup. Ct. 429; 5 Am. Fed. Tax Rep. 5377. … There appears to be no objection on the part of the taxpayer to either the basis or rate used by the Commissioner in determining the amount of the depreciation if the Board finds that allowance therefor should be made.
Cited 10 timesPublishedStrutwear Knitting Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 41 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 30, 1924
Strutwear Knitting Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 165. … The petition was mailed to the Board of Tax Appeals from Minneapolis on the evening of September 8, 1924, but was not received at the office of the Board of Tax Appeals in Washington until September 11, 1924 - 61 days after
Cited 0 timesPublishedJackson Iron & Steel Co. v. Commissioner
19 B.T.A. 1208 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 28, 1930
JACKSON IRON & STEEL CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Jackson Iron & Steel Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 14361. … Reviewed by the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWaimanalo Sugar Co. v. Commissioner
13 B.T.A. 323 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 10, 1928
WAIMANALO SUGAR CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Waimanalo Sugar Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 24879. … PHILLIPS *323 PHILLIPS: The findings of fact and opinion of the Board in this case were promulgated on July 9, 1928, and followed the findings of fact and decision of the Board in a companion case, Kahuku Plantation Co.,
Cited 0 timesPublishedMaryland Car Wheel Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 448 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 30, 1925
Maryland Car Wheel Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 534. … The Board determines that the deficiency is, for 1918, $234.08; for 1919, $6,378.93.
Cited 0 timesPublished16 B.T.A. 244 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 26, 1929
In Avery v. … Honesty of belief in the taxpayer is not conclusive nor binding on the Board.
Cited 1 timesPublished31 B.T.A. 439 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 25, 1934
of lands for public use, contracts and local improvements, the duties of the borough president regarding such improvements, powers of local courts concerning local improvements, the authority of the board of estimate and … Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 514 ; Frank H. Mesce, 64 Ct. Cls. 481; certiorari denied, 278 U. S. 612 .
Cited 1 timesPublished8 B.T.A. 460 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 4, 1927
In Anderson v. Johnson (1923) 45 R. … Co. v. Buck, 52 N. J.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCaribou Oil Mining Co. v. Commissioner
6 B.T.A. 511 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 15, 1927
CARIBOU OIL MINING CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Caribou Oil Mining Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 18474. … form the basis for an appeal to the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNichols & Cox Lumber Co. v. Commissioner
24 B.T.A. 54 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 19, 1931
NICHOLS & COX LUMBER COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Nichols & Cox Lumber Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 23601. … , this Board is without jurisdiction.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEast Ninth Euclid Co. v. Commissioner
26 B.T.A. 32 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 10, 1932
A. 1179; Western Maryland Railroad Co. v. Commissioner, 33 Fed. (2d) 895. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublished39 B.T.A. 813 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 21, 1939
See also Bogardus v. Commissioner, 302 U. S. 34 ; Jones v. Commissioner , 31 Fed. (2d) 755; Blair v. Rosseter, 32 Fed. (2d) 286. Cf. Alford J. Williams, Jr., 29 B. T. … A careful weighing of all of the evidence in this case convinces the Board that the disallowance of the “Other Deductions” by the respondent in the amount of $110,089.53 was proper.
Cited 10 timesPublishedRockwell Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
19 B.T.A. 277 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 14, 1930
ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Rockwell Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 29672. … The opening inventory for the taxable year ended June 30, 1924, contained 769,736 board feet valued at $16,410.77. The closing inventory for that year contained 2,276.361 board feet valued at $55,884.66.
Cited 2 timesPublished11 B.T.A. 301 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 29, 1928
See Dallas County Levee District No. 2 v. Looney, 207 S. W. 310 ; Dallas County Levee Improvement District No. 3 v. Ayers et al., 246 S. W. 1112 . In Caldwell Milling Co., 3 B. T. … A. 1232, the Board construed section 234 (a) (3) (c) of the Revenue Act of 1918 to mean special or local assessments as a class and as such not deductible.
Cited 3 timesPublishedVermont & M. R. Co. v. Commissioner
8 B.T.A. 500 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 4, 1927
VERMONT & MASSACHUSETTS RAILROAD CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Vermont & M. R. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 8850. … The Board, therefore, has no jurisdiction of the year 1920. . Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna